Calculate magnitude of spring force

In summary: Oh my gosh! I am an idiot! I was so focused on trying to solve for Fs to get the answer, that I never thought about combining the two equations and solving for Fs. Thanks for your help!In summary, on a horizontal, frictionless surface, a 2.0-kg mass (m1) and a 3.0-kg mass (m2) connected by a massless spring with spring constant k = 140 N/m experience a 15-N force (F) applied to the larger mass, m2. The magnitude of the spring force is given by Fs= F(1/(1+(m2/m1))). To find this, the free body diagrams of both blocks are
  • #1
PhySci83
7
0

Homework Statement


A 2.0-kg mass (m1) and a 3.0-kg mass (m2) are on a horizontal, frictionless surface, connected by a massless spring with spring constant k = 140 N/m. A 15-N force (F) is app0lied to the larger mass, m2, as shown in the figure:

|__m1__|-/-/-/-/-|____m2____| ----------> F

Show that the magnitude of the spring force (spring tension) is given by:

Fs= F(1/(1+(m2/m1))) <---Sorry, do not know how to make that look more asthetically pleasing.

Homework Equations


F = ma
Fs = -k(xf-xi)


The Attempt at a Solution



Since I am looking for the Fs, I attempted to find the net force of the system with the direction of the force being the positive x direction and the N force of the masses being the positive y.

So for the F going to the right, I said F = (m1+m2)*a; a = F/(m1+m2).

For the F of the spring, I said Fs = -k(xf-xi) and rearranged the equation so that delta_x = magnitude_F/K; delta_x=(ma)/K; then I plug in the value for a that I solved prior.

The problem is, I keep going around in circles with this thing. I am pretty far removed from basic HS math, but if the F wasn't pulled out of the equation, would it be:

Fs = F/(F + [(F*m2/F*m1)])?

Any help that would point me in the right direction would be greatfully appreciated. It seems like I have to solve for the various variables and plug them into the original equation:

Fs = -k(xf-xi)

but getting rid of K and delta_x are troubling me.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
1. Draw the free body diagrams of both the blocks
2. Write down the motion equations of both the bodies.
What do u find then??
 
  • #3
'Fs = F/(F + [(F*m2/F*m1)])'

Are not there too many F-s in your formula? F*m2/Fm1=m2*m1. If you meant F*m2/(F*m1), it is m2/m1=1.5, you can not add Newtons to it!

Draw the free body diagram, and see what force acts on m1 if it moves with the acceleration a=F/(m1+m2)

ehild
 
  • #4
OK, so I think I have the FBDs, but this was the part I was struggling the most with.

So for m1 I have:

|
| FN
[__m1__] -------> a
|
| Fg

Fnet,m1,x= a
Fnet,m1,y= 0

Am I missing the force of the spring on this? Isn't there an added force in the positive x direction?

For m2:

| FN
|
<--Fs[__m2__]--------> a
|
| Fg

Fnet,m2,x= a - Fs
Fnet,m2,y= 0

Is this all for the FBDs or am I missing something? Sorry for the drawings as I am at work and do not have access to a scanner.

THANKS FOR ALL THE HELP!
 
  • #5
PhySci83 said:
Fnet,m1,x= a
Fnet,m1,y= 0


Fnet,m2,x= a - Fs
Fnet,m2,y= 0

My friend, how can you equate force with acceleration!
These are two different physical quantities!

Don't you think you are missing a quantity called mass, coz what Newton's 2nd law says is:

Force = Mass x Acceleration!
 
  • #6
Whoops! What I meant was:

Fnet,m1,x= (m1 + m2)*a
Fnet,m1,y= 0

Fnet,m2,x= (m1+m2)*a - Fs
Fnet,m2,y= 0

Then F_net = Fnet,m2,x + Fnet,m1,x
 
  • #7
Do not forget that ∑F =ma. The resultant of all forces acting on m1 is equal m1*a. What horizontal force(s) act on m1? What is its acceleration?

ehild
 
  • #8
Are the forces that act on m1 the force of system accelerating from the force acted upon it plus the force of the spring? So a FBD would look like:

|
| FN --->Fs
[__m1__] -------> a
|
| Fg

F,x,m1= (m1*a) + Fs
F,x,m2=(m1+m2)*a -Fs

Then doesn't Fs cancel out?

acceleration of m1 is equal to the acceleration of the system which is a = F/(m1+m2)?

Sorry, I have tried this every way and still cannot come up with something that even looks correct. Are my above assumptions correct or am I still missing something?
 
  • #9
I show you a proper free body diagram. There is only one horizontal force exerted on m1: the spring force, Fs. And there are two horizontal forces exerted on m2: F=15 N and -Fs. The magnitude of the spring force is the same for both bodies, only the direction is opposite. The bodies move with the same acceleration a.

Newton's equations ∑Fi =ma for both objects:

m1*a = F - Fs
m2*a = Fs.

A force exerted on one body does not act on the other one.

If you add up the equations you get

(m1+m2)*a=F,

a=F/(m1+m2). You got this a already.

Use this a in the equation for m2 to get Fs.

ehild
 

Attachments

  • twoballs.JPG
    twoballs.JPG
    5.6 KB · Views: 619

What is the formula for calculating the magnitude of spring force?

The formula for calculating the magnitude of spring force is F = -kx, where F is the magnitude of the spring force, k is the spring constant, and x is the displacement from the equilibrium position.

How do you determine the spring constant?

The spring constant can be determined by dividing the magnitude of the spring force by the displacement from the equilibrium position. It can also be calculated by measuring the force exerted by the spring for a given displacement and using the formula k = F/x.

What units are used for the magnitude of spring force?

The magnitude of spring force is typically measured in Newtons (N) or pounds (lbs).

Can the magnitude of spring force be negative?

Yes, the magnitude of spring force can be negative. This indicates that the direction of the force is opposite to the direction of the displacement from the equilibrium position.

How does the magnitude of spring force change with displacement?

The magnitude of spring force is directly proportional to the displacement from the equilibrium position. This means that as the displacement increases, the magnitude of the spring force also increases. However, once the spring reaches its elastic limit, the force becomes non-linear and the relationship between magnitude and displacement becomes more complex.

Similar threads

  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
170
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
29
Views
908
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
12
Views
728
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
17
Views
1K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
14
Views
2K
Back
Top