Japan Earthquake: Nuclear Plants at Fukushima Daiichi

In summary: RCIC consists of a series of pumps, valves, and manifolds that allow coolant to be circulated around the reactor pressure vessel in the event of a loss of the main feedwater supply.In summary, the earthquake and tsunami may have caused a loss of coolant at the Fukushima Daiichi NPP, which could lead to a meltdown. The system for cooling the reactor core is designed to kick in in the event of a loss of feedwater, and fortunately this appears not to have happened yet.
  • #1,996
Depending of the translation he allegedly said that the plant would be decommissioned.. but I guess you never miss an occasion to jump on guns with preconceives opinions based shady data..

Meanwhile I manage to find some other photos from plant released today by A.P.
3 attached and 6 inlined

and some more
aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-15.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-0.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-1-11-12.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-20-7.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-50-49.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-50-20.jpg

japan-earthquake-2011-3-30-0-50-12.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-20-11.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-20-7.jpg
 

Attachments

  • aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-15.jpg
    aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-15.jpg
    73.9 KB · Views: 537
  • aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-0.jpg
    aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-0.jpg
    34.8 KB · Views: 762
  • aerial-2011-3-30-1-11-12.jpg
    aerial-2011-3-30-1-11-12.jpg
    38.4 KB · Views: 503
Last edited:
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #1,997
fred , even decommissioned would be the understatement of the decade

We have a huge accident in progress,
we have possible fission continuing (we still can't make out how the "mistake" on the I-134 and the other isotopes came to be)
we have radioactivity around the plant that reaches Chernobylian proportion even though they are trying to hide it ( >1000mSv/h ?)
we have at least one FSP damaged by a falling crane in reactor 3 (hats off to our perceptive radiologist)

and the only thing saving the japanese inland until now is the wind (as the austrian meteorological department reports every day).

I understand it is important to focus on the physics of this event in this forum, but I sometimes tend to think that some people here are more focused than TEPCO is the last weeks. (their "ill" chairman to begin with)
 
  • #1,998
Excellent photographs Fred, shame the res. isn't higher but still there's a lot to see!
I'm sure Tcups will be scrutinising these like I will when I get some time!
 
  • #1,999
|Fred said:
Depending of the translation he allegedly said that the plant would be decommissioned.. but I guess you never miss an occasion to jump on guns with preconceives opinions based shady data..

Meanwhile I manage to find some other photos from plant released today by A.P.
3 attached and 6 inlined

and some more
aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-15.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-0.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-1-11-12.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-20-7.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-50-49.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-50-20.jpg

japan-earthquake-2011-3-30-0-50-12.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-20-11.jpg

aerial-2011-3-30-0-20-7.jpg
Even the strength of the blast at Unit 3 did not blow out every single wall panel of the floor below the top (reactor access) floor. And the top floor (the top two tiers of columns) is where hydrogen was most likely to accumulate. Not only did the explosion at unit 4 take out every panel on the east and west side of the building of the floor below the reactor access floor (ie, at the same level as the SFP), it also appears to have taken out one south side panel a floor below the SFP (ie, two floors below the reactor access floor) and also, it did much less damage to the roof beam superstructure than did the blast at Unit 3, and it left the north wall of the top floor partially collapsed inward, and it left at least two panels on the east and west sides of the top floor intact. Compare, carefully, the east, west, and south elevation views.

http://nimg.sulekha.com/business/original700/aerial-2011-3-30-1-11-12.jpg

http://nimg.sulekha.com/business/original700/aerial-2011-3-30-0-20-7.jpg

http://nimg.sulekha.com/business/original700/japan-earthquake-2011-3-30-0-50-12.jpg

Great new photos. Lots to ponder.
 
  • #2,000
So it looks like the blast at unit 4 was much lower down in the building than that of unit three with unit 1 being initiated in the roofspace?
Very revealing images these.
Anyone know if there's video footage of the unit 4 blast?
a few more images here,

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/art...huge-amounts-claims-battle-lost.html?ITO=1490

and finally they're using drones, so original images will be far superior.
It looks like there are a lot of manhole covers open, either blown off during the explosion or possibly removed after for measurements of radiation.
But as they are only around unit 4 I suspect blown off during explosion.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,001
It seems like something is blurred out on just about every photo of reactor 3. Weird - must be just steam at an odd angle.
 
  • #2,002
timeasterday said:
It seems like something is blurred out on just about every photo of reactor 3. Weird - must be just steam at an odd angle.

Reminds me of the blur effect in the Ringu films!

Well spotted, it's a strange looking effect indeed. Unlikely to be steam as it's in the same form in all views shot at different times...

Does it line up with the hotspot in the IR image released previously?

/edit on quick inspection it does indeed line up with the large white spot in the IR. One wonders how far above the temp at white that area actually is.
 
  • #2,003
I forgot to give the full mandatoty credit
In this March 24, 2011 aerial photo taken by a small unmanned drone and released by AIR PHOTO SERVICE, Unit 4, left, and Unit 3 of the crippled Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear power plant are seen in Okumamachi, Fukushima prefecture, northern Japan. (AP Photo/AIR PHOTO SERVICE)

Here is the picture of the drone
japan-earthquake-2011-3-30-1-20-1.jpg


As previously mentioned Japanese officials do have picture taken with a military class drone with resolution allowing to read plates on the car..

Ps: they waited 6 days to release the picture as far as I understand
 
  • #2,004
Well, when you say that Tepco chairman is also talking to shareholders, maybe you are right, but again as a citizen, this way of saying things in its first intervention since the very beginning, and just before apologizing by this typical japanese move of inclination of the body in front of the press, creates a strange feeling in my body. Maybe this inclination is for the shareholders in fact, who knows?

And even if this is for the shareholders AND the victims, i find problematic to put on the same level at the same time the shareholders and the victims. If he wants to give a message to shareholders, he can use private means, send mails or letters, pay some adds in the relevant newspaper, or give an economic press conference. The mix up of these things of various importance is kind of strange to me as i said.
 
  • #2,005
curious11 said:
Reminds me of the blur effect in the Ringu films!

Well spotted, it's a strange looking effect indeed. Unlikely to be steam as it's in the same form in all views shot at different times...

Does it line up with the hotspot in the IR image released previously?

/edit on quick inspection it does indeed line up with the large white spot in the IR. One wonders how far above the temp at white that area actually is.
If it's where the hole is to the south of centre in the roof of the building I'm pretty sure it's where the projectile like lump of heavy (concrete) blew upwards in the video and just pierced through the steel girders. this is where some of the steam is emanating.
Hope we can get full res images!
In fact looking at the 2 trails of debris on the roof of the turbine building (one with hole in it) the two lines of debris are almost parallel, suggesting that the explosion came from two sources, or it had two escape routes.
After re-examining... they do converge (Using the white lines at the very edge of turbine building) but to the north side of the building, not where the blurred area is, and the hole.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,006
timeasterday said:
It seems like something is blurred out on just about every photo of reactor 3. Weird - must be just steam at an odd angle.
steam over water of SFP
 
Last edited:
  • #2,007
So they were moving fuel in/out of reactor building 4

Check the truck in the tunnel

aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-15.jpg
 
  • #2,008
This is a very nice picture, since it show the number of panels above the work-floor (and the SFP surface).

Now back to the other analysis of the SPF and blowout.

aerial-2011-3-30-3-20-15.jpg
 
  • #2,009
|Fred said:
Depending of the translation he allegedly said that the plant would be decommissioned.. but I guess you never miss an occasion to jump on guns with preconceives opinions based shady data..

Meanwhile I manage to find some other photos from plant released today by A.P.
3 attached and 6 inlined

and some more
Nice. If those service tunnels are on the same end as the SFPs, then all 4 units, 1-4 have the SFPs on the south side of the building and the equipment storage pool is on the north. The fuel handling machines would have been parked at the south end of the spent fuel pools, and unit 4s refueling could have been over the SFP. If there was fuel debris from SFP, it then should be coming out the south face of the buildings.
 
  • #2,010
AntonL said:
steam over water of SFP

I think the blurriness is caused more by the fact the debris is slumped into the water. It definitely appears more of a blur than a fade although it could just be down to the low resolution of the images.
 
  • #2,011
rhody said:
Astronuc,

If someone suspects they have inhaled plutonium, are there medical or radiological tests to confirm it ?

Rhody...

Faecal monitoring is one of the best methods, if not the most pleasant. Also urine monitoring & nasal swabs.
 
  • #2,012
http://www.spiegel.de/images/image-193255-galleryV9-wbmd.jpg

so the hole blown in the south side of unit 4, is that above an SFP or to the side of it?
 
  • #2,013
artax said:
http://www.spiegel.de/images/image-193255-galleryV9-wbmd.jpg

so the hole blown in the south side of unit 4, is that above an SFP or to the side of it?

Looks to be to the side to me...
 
  • #2,014
Astronuc said:
Nice. If those service tunnels are on the same end as the SFPs, then all 4 units, 1-4 have the SFPs on the south side of the building and the equipment storage pool is on the north. The fuel handling machines would have been parked at the south end of the spent fuel pools, and unit 4s refueling could have been over the SFP. If there was fuel debris from SFP, it then should be coming out the south face of the buildings.

Two photos that seem to confirm this view.

The inside of reactor building number 4 in operation. The fuel handling machine is in the background and the trench to the SFP can be seen leading from the open reactor. The gantry crane is above to the rear.
[PLAIN]http://img.allvoices.com/thumbs/event/598/486/75100052-file-photo.jpg [Broken]

The outside after the explosion that seems to show the fuel handling machine from the other side:
[PLAIN]http://mainichi.jp/select/jiken/graph/20110327_2/5.jpg [Broken]

The top image is from here:http://www.allvoices.com/contributed-news/8467550-online-breaking-news-nuclear-reactor-explosion/image/75100052-file-photo-of-the-inside-of-reactor-no-4-at-the-fukushima-daiichi-nuclear-plant-in"
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,015
curious11 said:
Looks to be to the side to me...

OK yes, so the SFP is to the right of the hole I agree, and the steam is coming from the SFP under the green crane pictured in the above post by AW. It would be nice to get diagrammes now of the fukushima plant and rooms/spaces inside reactors 1-4, with an overlay of the outer panels in relation.
 
Last edited:
  • #2,016
rhody said:
Astronuc,

If someone suspects they have inhaled plutonium, are there medical or radiological tests to confirm it ?

curie said:
Faecal monitoring is one of the best methods, if not the most pleasant. Also urine monitoring & nasal swabs.

Thanks curie,

So these methods can detect all radio-isotopes, (plutonium, cesium, etc...) in soft tissue, like the lung, thyroid, etc... ?

Rhody...
 
  • #2,017
artax said:
OK yes, so the SFP is to the right of the hole I agree, and the steam is coming from the SFP under the green crane pictured in the above post by AW. It would be nice to get diagrammes now of the fukushima plant and rooms/spaces inside reactors 1-4, with an overlay of the outer panels in relation.

Annotated from the AP Photos here:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3218801&postcount=2012

The red lines have been added as my interpretation of the level of the top floor (reactor access, top of SFP's). Compare damage above and below each reference line and damage to the roof, Buildings 3, 4.

South Elevation
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/SouthElevation.png [Broken]

West Elevation
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/WestElevation.png [Broken]

East Elevation
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/EastElevation.png [Broken]

Top, down
http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Top.png [Broken]
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,019
Hi, long time listener, first time caller. I'm currently living in Japan, pretty far from danger but concerned about the water and food becoming contaminated. I don't want to sound political but, in today's press conference the TOEPC spokesman only mentioned iodine levels (good news because of the short half life), no mention of cesium. Does anyone have an explanation for this?
 
  • #2,020
Hi rasherz , Help from someone fluent in Japanese listening to the Tepco press point would be lovely , welcome to the thread .
I'm not sure that I can answer you question , but I would like to mention that tepco is mostly monitoring radiation in regards to the plants.

Heath related issue ie isotopes found in the air of cities in watter etc.. Is done by gov agency and non gov agency.. So the tepco press conference would not be in my opinion the best place to get info you are looking for.
 
  • #2,021
jensjakob said:
Hi,

I think there are 3 levels of panels, so the red line should be one panel lower.

B'regards
Jens Jakob

Jens:

Three levels of panels where? At the top floor? I think there are two above, but could be wrong. Doesn't change the reference line with respect to comparison of damages above vs below, though, right? More damage in the lower sections of Bldg 4 with much less overall damage to the roof top of Bldg 4 the way I see it. Corrections?

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Top2Levels.png [Broken]

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/SouthUnit4.png [Broken]

Sure looks like the smoke/steam is coming from the floor above and the water is being sprayed at that level, too.
 

Attachments

  • Two Above.jpg
    Two Above.jpg
    65.1 KB · Views: 384
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,022
rasherz said:
Hi, long time listener, first time caller. I'm currently living in Japan, pretty far from danger but concerned about the water and food becoming contaminated. I don't want to sound political but, in today's press conference the TOEPC spokesman only mentioned iodine levels (good news because of the short half life), no mention of cesium. Does anyone have an explanation for this?

Iodine gets concentrated into your thyroid and is mored dangerous and where you have iodine you will also have cesium.

Cesium looks like potassium (thats why you get potassium-iodine tablets two in one) and is distributed throughout your body and like potassium, cesium is excreted from the body fairly quickly

but read about it here it is better explained
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/Cesium.pdf [Broken]
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/Iodine.pdf [Broken]
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/Plutonium.pdf [Broken]

and here is the complete list of all possible elements
http://www.evs.anl.gov/pub/doc/ANL_ContaminantFactSheets_All_070418.pdf [Broken]

rasherz look after yourself and stay safe
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,023
DrDu said:
What's the problem with Tc-99m having 6 hour half life?

It means the Tc-99m was produced within six hours prior to detection.
 
  • #2,024
morningperson said:
It means the Tc-99m was produced within six hours prior to detection.
sorry but it doesn't, it could have been produced up to many times the half life ago. it depends on your detectio limit and amount produced.
basically if 1kg was produced after 6hrs there'd be 1/2kg, then after six more 1/4 after 6more 1/8.
so after x half lives there's 1/(2^x) where ^ means to the power.
 
  • #2,025
|Fred said:
Hi rasherz , Help from someone fluent in Japanese listening to the Tepco press point would be lovely , welcome to the thread .
I'm not sure that I can answer you question , but I would like to mention that tepco is mostly monitoring radiation in regards to the plants.

Heath related issue ie isotopes found in the air of cities in watter etc.. Is done by gov agency and non gov agency.. So the tepco press conference would not be in my opinion the best place to get info you are looking for.

I'm just living here, my Japanese is ok, but the technical vocabulary is a bit difficult to follow. Also to be honest, I'm getting better information from here. My wife is Japanese and I'm giving her updates based on what's on this forum, well ahead of the news. There's still a lot of smoke and mirrors going on. No mention on TV about the smoke coming from the second plant 12 kms south, as far as I know. It's hard to decide what's just sensationalism in the western media and what is being spoon fed to us by TOEPC a few days late. So far so good with this forum.
Thanks guys.
 
  • #2,026
TCups said:
Jens:

Three levels of panels where? At the top floor? I think there are two above, but could be wrong. Doesn't change the reference line with respect to comparison of damages above vs below, though, right? More damage in the lower sections of Bldg 4 with much less overall damage to the roof top of Bldg 4 the way I see it. Corrections?

http://i306.photobucket.com/albums/nn270/tcups/Top2Levels.png [Broken]

I would say 3 levels above groundfloor. 1 level standing on the west-side, 2 levels fallen to the ground.

Am searching all I can for pictures from inside - that can give the clues.

This picture shows 3 levels of panels, but it looks like it is a different construction (lighter) then #3 :-(
http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2011/03/14/74158-fukushima-daiichi-reactor.jpg [Broken]

Allthough this image:
http://www.pmw.de/pm_online/data/PCP_deutsche-betonpumpe-fukushima-504x378.jpg [Broken]
could support the theory that there are only 2 levels above the refueling deck
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,027
yes unit one, the first to explode was smaller output and different wall design by the looks of things, where have they removed panels of unit 2 to avoid a future explosion like the others? is it the one in the side, quite low down? emanating steam? and is it above the fuel pool?
 
  • #2,028
jensjakob said:
I would say 3 levels above groundfloor. 1 level standing on the west-side, 2 levels fallen to the ground.

Am searching all I can for pictures from inside - that can give the clues.

This picture shows 3 levels of panels, but it looks like it is a different construction (lighter) then #3 :-(
http://img.ibtimes.com/www/data/images/full/2011/03/14/74158-fukushima-daiichi-reactor.jpg [Broken]

Jens:

I believe Units 3, 4 have two levels of concrete columns, reinforced, to bear the weight of the overhead crane. At 3, the north end wall has collapsed, and the crane fell below. I believe the original square hole on the north face of Bldg 4 was below the level of the reactor access floor.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #2,029
Two panels sit above the reactor service floor according to https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=3193009&postcount=305 (AtomicWombat, page 20, post #305). See also the ridge at the bottom of the two panels.

See also images:

Tcups, page 21, #330
various on page 23
jinxdone, page 24, #381
Tcups, page 29, #463

The third set of panels sit below the ridge and below the reactor service floor. A blast out at the third level could mean damage to the SFP.
 
  • #2,030
artax said:
sorry but it doesn't, it could have been produced up to many times the half life ago. it depends on your detectio limit and amount produced.
basically if 1kg was produced after 6hrs there'd be 1/2kg, then after six more 1/4 after 6more 1/8.
so after x half lives there's 1/(2^x) where ^ means to the power.

and as I said it is a daughter nuclide of Mo-99, which has a longer half-life (66 h) so actually it rather tracks the presence of its parent. But still 66 h is a rather short period compared to 20 days.
 
<h2>1. What caused the Japan earthquake and subsequent nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daiichi?</h2><p>The Japan earthquake, also known as the Great East Japan Earthquake, was caused by a massive underwater earthquake that occurred on March 11, 2011. The earthquake had a magnitude of 9.0 and was the strongest ever recorded in Japan. The earthquake triggered a massive tsunami, which caused extensive damage to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and led to a nuclear disaster.</p><h2>2. What is the current status of the nuclear reactors at Fukushima Daiichi?</h2><p>As of now, all of the nuclear reactors at Fukushima Daiichi have been shut down and are no longer in operation. However, the site is still being monitored for radiation levels and there is an ongoing effort to clean up the radioactive materials that were released during the disaster.</p><h2>3. How much radiation was released during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster?</h2><p>According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster released an estimated 10-15% of the radiation that was released during the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. However, the exact amount of radiation released is still being studied and debated.</p><h2>4. What were the health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster?</h2><p>The health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are still being studied and monitored. The most immediate health impact was the evacuation of approximately 160,000 people from the surrounding areas to avoid exposure to radiation. There have also been reported cases of thyroid cancer and other health issues among those who were exposed to the radiation.</p><h2>5. What measures have been taken to prevent future nuclear disasters in Japan?</h2><p>Following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, the Japanese government has implemented stricter safety regulations for nuclear power plants and has conducted stress tests on all existing plants. They have also established a new regulatory agency, the Nuclear Regulation Authority, to oversee the safety of nuclear power plants. Additionally, renewable energy sources are being promoted as a more sustainable and safer alternative to nuclear power in Japan.</p>

1. What caused the Japan earthquake and subsequent nuclear disaster at Fukushima Daiichi?

The Japan earthquake, also known as the Great East Japan Earthquake, was caused by a massive underwater earthquake that occurred on March 11, 2011. The earthquake had a magnitude of 9.0 and was the strongest ever recorded in Japan. The earthquake triggered a massive tsunami, which caused extensive damage to the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant and led to a nuclear disaster.

2. What is the current status of the nuclear reactors at Fukushima Daiichi?

As of now, all of the nuclear reactors at Fukushima Daiichi have been shut down and are no longer in operation. However, the site is still being monitored for radiation levels and there is an ongoing effort to clean up the radioactive materials that were released during the disaster.

3. How much radiation was released during the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster?

According to the International Atomic Energy Agency, the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster released an estimated 10-15% of the radiation that was released during the Chernobyl disaster in 1986. However, the exact amount of radiation released is still being studied and debated.

4. What were the health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster?

The health effects of the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster are still being studied and monitored. The most immediate health impact was the evacuation of approximately 160,000 people from the surrounding areas to avoid exposure to radiation. There have also been reported cases of thyroid cancer and other health issues among those who were exposed to the radiation.

5. What measures have been taken to prevent future nuclear disasters in Japan?

Following the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear disaster, the Japanese government has implemented stricter safety regulations for nuclear power plants and has conducted stress tests on all existing plants. They have also established a new regulatory agency, the Nuclear Regulation Authority, to oversee the safety of nuclear power plants. Additionally, renewable energy sources are being promoted as a more sustainable and safer alternative to nuclear power in Japan.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
41
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
7
Views
46K
  • Nuclear Engineering
51
Replies
2K
Views
416K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
5
Views
5K
Replies
6
Views
17K
  • Nuclear Engineering
22
Replies
763
Views
258K
  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
38
Views
14K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
4
Views
10K
Back
Top