- #1
cam875
- 228
- 0
I found this on the web, it was written by someone without formal physics education but I was wondering what some educated users here with a background in physics think about it. My problem with it is that he claims time doesn't exist in any perspective only this physical continuity but how can anything move since all motion is, is the amount of distance covered over a specific time interval. Also without time nothing would ever progress or evolve really from a beginning point and therefore nothing would change, also going along with why motion wouldn't work without time. I don't know maybe I missed the whole point of his essay but I am not too convinced over it. Discuss and enjoy.
Link: http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Lynds_Time_for_a_Change__Th.pdf
Link: http://fqxi.org/data/essay-contest-files/Lynds_Time_for_a_Change__Th.pdf