Dark Matter and Thorne's unlikely time travel

In summary, the conversation revolves around the possibility of using dark energy as a source of negative energy for a theoretical "warp drive" and the potential for time travel through a traversable and stable wormhole. The question is raised about the relationship between the axioms of General Relativity and Quantum Mechanics and whether a saving mechanism in General Relativity could prevent paradoxes in time travel. The conversation also mentions the Novikov self-consistency principle and how the possibility of time travel does not necessarily lead to logical contradictions.
  • #1
nomadreid
Gold Member
1,665
203
There are a lot of "IF's" in the following, so this may be more a question of logic than of physics.

Also, I have two questions revolving around the same themes; they are independent from one another so a response can be to one or both of them.

(1) In http://www.phy.duke.edu/~hsg/55/related-files/sciam-wormholes-jan-2000.pdf it is pointed out that a space-time "bubble" of the sort needed for science-fiction "warp drive" would require an inordinate amount of negative energy around it. Since dark energy must have negative pressure, then IF dark energy is variable and IF the variations could be localized, could dark energy serve the same purpose as the negative energy in this construction?

(2) First the background, then the question:

(a) The background: In 1988 Kip Thorne proposed a method to attempt to make a time machine out of a wormhole, supposing that a wormhole could be made traversable and relatively stable. (The account is in his popular book "Black Holes & Time Warps: Einstein's Outrageous Legacy".) He points out that the quantum fluctuations would recycle themselves and thus the positive energy inside would snowball until, most likely, the wormhole would be destroyed, saving us from time-travel paradoxes. This version of Hawking's "Chronology Protection" has a quantum phenomenon saving the problem of General Relativity.

(b) The question, in two parts:

(i) Is the following reasoning correct? [For my own comfort, I use the language of foundational mathematics and formulate my question in terms of axioms.] Most of the axioms for General Relativity are presently independent of the axioms of Quantum Mechanics, so that one could conceive of a universe in which the axioms of General Relativity remained the same while many of the present axioms of Quantum Mechanics were absent or negated. (OK, this may change when a theory of Quantum Gravity arrives, but until that time...). In this universe the savior "Infinite Quantum Fluctuations" then may be absent, and Thorne's time machine would be possible, leading to the contradictions of time-travel, leading to the conclusion that the axioms of General Relativity must be faulty, or that there must be a saving mechanism in General Relativity itself to forbid the kind of twisting of spacetime in Thorne's mechanism.

(ii) If this is correct, is there such a saving mechanism in General Relativity which is independent of the mechanism of the snowballing quantum fluctuations?
 
Last edited by a moderator:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
nomadreid said:
(i) Is the following reasoning correct? [For my own comfort, I use the language of foundational mathematics and formulate my question in terms of axioms.] Most of the axioms for General Relativity are presently independent of the axioms of Quantum Mechanics, so that one could conceive of a universe in which the axioms of General Relativity remained the same while many of the present axioms of Quantum Mechanics were absent or negated. (OK, this may change when a theory of Quantum Gravity arrives, but until that time...). In this universe the savior "Infinite Quantum Fluctuations" then may be absent, and Thorne's time machine would be possible, leading to the contradictions of time-travel, leading to the conclusion that the axioms of General Relativity must be faulty, or that there must be a saving mechanism in General Relativity itself to forbid the kind of twisting of spacetime in Thorne's mechanism.
Why should time travel lead to any "contradictions"? The assumption usually made by Thorne and other physicists who analyze the possibility of time travel in GR is that something like the Novikov self-consistency principle would apply, so however physically implausible time travel may be it needn't lead to any logical paradoxes. The fact that some theory allows time travel is not enough reason to rule it out a priori, although of course physicists have a number of reasons to suspect it won't be allowed in a final theory of quantum gravity.
 

1. What exactly is dark matter?

Dark matter is a hypothetical type of matter that is believed to make up about 85% of the total matter in the universe. It does not emit or absorb light, making it invisible to telescopes and difficult to detect. Its existence is inferred from its gravitational effects on visible matter.

2. How does dark matter relate to Thorne's unlikely time travel?

In Kip Thorne's theory of time travel, he suggests that a spinning black hole could create a "wormhole" in space-time that connects two different points in time. Dark matter plays a crucial role in stabilizing and sustaining this wormhole, making time travel theoretically possible.

3. Is there any evidence for the existence of dark matter?

While there is no direct evidence for dark matter, there have been many observations and experiments that support its existence. These include the gravitational lensing of light from distant galaxies, the rotation curves of galaxies, and the distribution of matter in the universe.

4. Can we harness dark matter for time travel?

At this time, there is no known way to harness dark matter for time travel. Thorne's theory is purely theoretical and has not been tested or proven. Furthermore, the amount of energy and technology required to manipulate dark matter is currently beyond our capabilities.

5. What are the potential implications of Thorne's theory for the study of time and space?

If Thorne's theory of time travel is proven to be true, it would revolutionize our understanding of time and space. It would also have significant implications for the laws of physics and potentially open up new possibilities for space exploration and interstellar travel.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
969
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
404
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
875
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
960
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top