| New Reply |
collimating incoherent light emitted by a LED |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Nov20-12, 11:47 PM | #1 |
|
|
collimating incoherent light emitted by a LED
Hello,
What would be the best method to "collimate" light from a LED with an emitting area of 12mm^2 and a maximum divergence angle of 80° with minimal loss of light intensity? I want to collimate it into a beam of approximately 5-10mm. I have an aspheric condenser lense at hand with an effective focal length of 13.7mm. This lens succeeds in making the beam spherical, with a diameter of approximately 30mm at the focal length, but it still undergoes significant divergence. I have tried adding more positive lenses into the optical system to try, but I can't seem to create such a small beam diameter without losing a great portion of the emitted lighted. Is there any particular lense configuration I could use? Thanks. |
| Nov21-12, 08:47 AM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
I think it is hard to keep a significant fraction of light in the beam, unless you add a lense every 2-5 cm or something similar. You cannot reduce the phase-space size of your light, no matter how the setup looks like.
|
| Nov21-12, 09:55 AM | #3 |
|
Recognitions:
|
I agree with mfb- the large size of the emitter restricts your ability to collimate the beam at even a moderate diameter without lossy beam shaping (spatial filtering, for example).
Over what range does the beam need to be 5-10mm in diameter? |
| Nov21-12, 03:47 PM | #4 |
|
|
collimating incoherent light emitted by a LED
there is no limit as to distance, as I have a lot of mirrors available and a lot of workspace. what is the best way to reduce the amount of light lost? I managed to "collimate" it to a diameter of about 10mm, but in order to do so I used a setup similar to a pinhole and I lost a lot of light. but to me at this stage a pinhole seems the way to go...
|
| Nov22-12, 04:43 AM | #5 |
|
|
to ask the obvious.....
why not just use a laser LED ?? already collimated with built in lens :) Dave |
| Nov22-12, 07:56 AM | #6 |
|
|
i want to try and use a LED instead!
|
| Nov22-12, 01:01 PM | #7 |
|
|
YouŽre perfectly right about the pinhole.
The standard way of producing a parallel beam used to be: Use a lens to produce a (reduced) image of your light source onto/into a pinhole. Try to capture as much of the light as possible. On the other side of the pinhole, use a lens to produce your collimated beam. Then you use autocollimation to adjust the position (and tilt) of the lens for minimal divergence (and beam position). Beam size adjustment requires a diaphragm. But of course you will lose a lot of light this way. You can vary the pinhole size for the best compromise. And youŽd better use an optical bench or an optical table for mechanical stability. |
| Nov22-12, 02:05 PM | #8 |
|
|
"no limit as to distance" implies zero power from an incoherent source, even if there were no diffraction.
A laser diode would be limited by diffraction. You get one diode in each CD or DVD reader-burner. |
| New Reply |
| Tags |
| collimate led laser |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: collimating incoherent light emitted by a LED
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Collimating Light from a Hg Arc Lamp | General Physics | 6 | ||
| collimating focused light | Classical Physics | 19 | ||
| Collimating Light | General Physics | 10 | ||
| Why are light waves from 2 separate light bulbs incoherent? | General Physics | 5 | ||
| Collimating light | General Physics | 4 | ||