Why is Schouten's book on tensor analysis not recommended for physicists?

  • Thread starter uiulic
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Physicists
In summary, "Introduction to vector analysis" by Harry F. Davis (1961) mentions that "Tensor analysis for physicists" by J.A. Schouten (1951) is primarily intended for applied mathematicians rather than physicists. Davis also notes that there are no modern books on tensor analysis specifically written for pure mathematicians. The conversation then discusses the background of Schouten and Davis, with the conclusion that while Schouten was a mathematician with interest in physics, he is not considered a physicist.
  • #1
uiulic
99
0
"Introduction to vector analysis" (Harry F. Davis, 1961) page 284 says:


"Tensor analysis for physicists by J.A.Schouten 1951" is not intended so much for physicists as for applied mathematicians. This author knows of no book on tensor analysis written in a modern style for pure mathematicians."

I am reading Davis's book at the moment (its vector part is very good), which only talks about tenosr in about two pages. Why did Davis criticize Schouten (a famous physicist? but I did not read his book) so seriously?

GG
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Schouten was a mathematician who was interested in physics... but I don't think he is considered a physicist.

I know of Schouten (and have read his Tensor Analysis for Physicists and parts of his Ricci Calculus and some of his papers)... but not of Davis... although I'm sure I have seen the Davis book in passing.
 
  • #3
GGG

There are a few reasons why Schouten's book on tensor analysis may not be recommended for physicists. Firstly, as Davis mentions, Schouten's book is geared towards applied mathematicians rather than physicists. This means that it may not cover the specific applications and examples that physicists are interested in.

Additionally, Schouten's book was written in 1951, which means it may not cover more recent developments and advancements in tensor analysis that are relevant to physicists. Physics is a constantly evolving field, and it is important for physicists to have access to the most up-to-date resources.

Furthermore, as Davis notes, there were no other books at the time written in a modern style for pure mathematicians. This could mean that Schouten's book may not be as accessible or easy to understand for physicists who may not have as strong of a background in mathematics.

Finally, it is important to note that Davis's criticism of Schouten's book is not meant to discredit Schouten's work or expertise as a physicist. It simply highlights that Schouten's book may not be the most suitable resource for physicists specifically looking to learn about tensor analysis.
 

1. Why is Schouten's book on tensor analysis not recommended for physicists?

Schouten's book on tensor analysis is not recommended for physicists because it is very mathematically rigorous and may be difficult for those without a strong background in mathematics to understand. It also focuses more on abstract mathematical concepts rather than the practical applications of tensors in physics.

2. Are there any benefits to using Schouten's book on tensor analysis for physicists?

While Schouten's book may not be recommended for physicists, it does have its benefits. It provides a very thorough and comprehensive understanding of tensor analysis, which can be useful for those pursuing advanced research in theoretical physics.

3. Can physicists without a strong background in mathematics still benefit from Schouten's book on tensor analysis?

It may be challenging for physicists without a strong mathematical background to understand Schouten's book on tensor analysis. However, with dedication and effort, it is possible to gain a solid understanding of the subject matter.

4. Are there any alternative books on tensor analysis that are recommended for physicists?

Yes, there are many alternative books on tensor analysis that are recommended for physicists. Some popular choices include "Tensor Analysis for Physicists" by Dwight E. Neuenschwander and "Introduction to Tensor Calculus, Relativity, and Cosmology" by Derek F. Lawden.

5. Is Schouten's book on tensor analysis completely irrelevant for physicists?

No, Schouten's book is not completely irrelevant for physicists. While it may not be the most practical choice for those looking to apply tensor analysis to their research, it still provides a deep understanding of the mathematical foundations of tensors, which can be useful for theoretical studies.

Similar threads

  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Sticky
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
10
Views
5K
Replies
2
Views
4K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
8
Views
2K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
10
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
7
Views
3K
  • Science and Math Textbooks
Replies
7
Views
3K
Back
Top