What's the Verdict on "Quant-ph/9905077"?

  • Thread starter martinbn
  • Start date
In summary, the conversation is about a paper on the Copenhagen Interpretation and its extension to encompass interacting individual systems. The authors propose a mathematical structure that resolves the paradoxes surrounding the Measurement Problem in quantum mechanics. The paper has a confusing date of 2008, which is due to the way LaTeX and arXiv work.
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Here is the abstract:

"The Copenhagen Interpretation describes individual systems, using the same Hilbert space formalism as does the statistical ensemble interpretation (SQM). This leads to the well-known paradoxes surrounding the Measurement Problem. We extend this common mathematical structure to encompass certain natural bundles with connections over the Hilbert sphere S. This permits a consistent extension of the statistical interpretation to interacting individual systems, thereby resolving these paradoxes.

Suppose V is a physical system in interaction with another system W. The state vector of V+W has a set of polar decompositions with a vector q of complex coefficients. These are parameterized by the right toroid T of amplitudes q, and comprise a singular toroidal bundle over S, which comprises the enlarged state space of V+W. We prove that each T has a unique natural convex partition yielding the correct SQM probabilities. In the extended theory V and W synchronously assume pure spectral states according to which member of the partition contains q. The apparent indeterminism of SQM is thus attributable to the effectively random distribution of initial phases. "


This has a date on the paper of 2008, which is confusing because the submission history does not list a revision after 1999. I see that occasionally, not sure what it signifies exactly.
 
  • #3
DrChinese said:
This has a date on the paper of 2008, which is confusing because the submission history does not list a revision after 1999. I see that occasionally, not sure what it signifies exactly.
It has to do with how LaTeX and arXiv work. LaTeX prints a date corresponding to the date at which the PDF was produced from the LaTeX source. Thus, the printed date (2008 in this case) corresponds to the date at which PDF was produced from the LaTeX source. The LaTeX source itself may have been submitted to arXiv at a much earlier time.
 

What is "Quant-ph/9905077"?

"Quant-ph/9905077" is a scientific paper published in the field of quantum physics. It discusses a specific topic or research question within the realm of quantum mechanics.

What is the verdict on "Quant-ph/9905077"?

The verdict on "Quant-ph/9905077" is the conclusion or outcome of the research presented in the paper. It may be a new discovery, a confirmation or refutation of existing theories, or further insights into a particular phenomenon.

What is the significance of "Quant-ph/9905077" in the field of quantum physics?

"Quant-ph/9905077" may hold significance in the field of quantum physics if it presents new findings or challenges existing theories. It may also contribute to the overall understanding of quantum mechanics and its applications.

Who wrote "Quant-ph/9905077"?

The authors of "Quant-ph/9905077" are typically scientists or researchers who have conducted the study and written the paper. Their names and affiliations are usually listed at the beginning of the paper.

Where can I find "Quant-ph/9905077"?

"Quant-ph/9905077" may be available in various scientific databases or online repositories, such as arXiv or PubMed. It may also be published in a scientific journal or presented at a conference.

Similar threads

Replies
1
Views
578
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
615
Replies
11
Views
993
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
959
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
0
Views
657
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
740
Replies
3
Views
775
Back
Top