- #1
Rake
- 19
- 0
Is it reasonable to assume that if there are areas of space that are causally disconnected from us because they are receding at superluminal velocities then there must be galaxies that we cannot observe? And if this can be assumed then how do cosmologists estimate that the matter in the universe only comprises 5% of the total amount of matter that is required to explain the currect rate of expansion and attribute the remaining balance to Dark Matter and Dark Energy? Is it not possible that there are areas of space that we cannot see that also have an effect on this expansion?