Prove that the lim (x->1) x^2 + 2 is NOT equal to 2.999?

  • Thread starter bezgin
  • Start date
In summary, to prove that the limit \lim_{x\rightarrow 1}x^2+2 is not equal to 2.999, we need to show that there is no relation between epsilon and delta. By considering both cases when x>1 and x<1, we can choose appropriate values for epsilon and delta that will make the difference between the function and 2.999 greater than epsilon. This shows that 2.999 cannot be the limit and we can prove this using the formal definition of a limit.
  • #1
bezgin
22
0
How can we prove that the lim (x->1) x^2 + 2 is NOT equal to 2.999? (example I made up right now) At the end of each proof we find a relation between epsilon and delta. What does it mean?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You can't take back the 2 as a constant, and the limit of x² will be 1
 
  • #3
Since
[tex]\lim_{x\rightarrow 1}x^2+2=2.999 \iff \lim_{x\rightarrow 1}x^2=0.999[/tex]
we can work with the righthanded expression. (it's easier).
We'll have to find an [itex]\epsilon>0[/itex] such that for any [itex]\delta>0[/itex] we have [itex]|x-1|<\delta [/itex] AND [itex]|x^2-0.999|>\epsilon[/itex]

EDIT: Removed 'proof', because of errors.
 
Last edited:
  • #4
my friend it's real simple; as the 2 won't be effected by the limit, so only part affected by limit is x^2 when x->1

although u are write it might go to 2.999 when it approach from left, but u need to consider another fact when limit approach from right than it will be 3.00001 that's how we prove that because u don't specify as limit apporaches from right or left
 
  • #5
Proving that [tex] \lim_{x\rightarrow a} f(x) = b [/tex] means that it should be possible, by choosing a [tex] \delta [/tex] , to make the make the difference in values of f(x) and b smaller than any positive number [tex]\epsilon [/tex], for all the values of [tex]|x-a|[/tex] less than [tex] \delta [/tex].

For 3, you can show this to be true. But for 2.999, although you can choose a number for which the difference is smaller than any positive number, but this will not be true for all the [tex] |x-a|[/tex] smaller than that chosen number.

That is the reason why 2.999 isn't the limit of the function.


spacetime
www.geocities.com/physics_all/index.html
 
  • #6
These replies make think, once again, what does it mean to be "close"?
Can't we find a relation between epsilon and delta by doing the operations abs(x^2 + 2 - 2.999) < epsilon and abs(x-1) < delta?
I'm really stuck with this issue for two weeks and think I will not understand the concept of the formal definition of a limit. I've tried nearly anything on the web :(
 
  • #7
Sure, here's how:
[tex]|x^{2}+2-2.9991|=|(x-1)(x+1)+r|,r=0.0009[/tex]
1) Assume x>1:
Then r+(x-1)(x+1)>r>0, so:
[tex]|(x-1)(x+1)+r|>r[/tex].
Choose in this case, [tex]\epsilon<r[/tex]
2)Assume x<1.
Then, you can find [tex]\delta[/tex], so that [tex](1-x)(x+1)<\frac{r}{2}[/tex]
Hence, by the triangle inequality, we have:
[tex]|x^{2}+2-2.9991|=|(x-1)(x+1)+r|\geq(r-(1-x)(x+1))\geq(r-\frac{r}{2})=\frac{r}{2}[/tex]

Hence, the choice [tex]\epsilon<\frac{r}{2}[/tex] is always out of reach, so 2.9991 cannot be the limit.
 
Last edited:

1. How do you prove that the limit of (x->1) x^2 + 2 is not equal to 2.999?

To prove this, we can use the epsilon-delta definition of a limit. We need to show that for any epsilon greater than 0, there exists a delta greater than 0 such that for all x values within a distance of delta from 1, the function x^2 + 2 does not equal 2.999.

2. What is the value of the limit (x->1) x^2 + 2?

The value of the limit is 3. This can be seen by plugging in x=1 into the function x^2 + 2, which gives us a value of 3.

3. Can we use the graph of the function to prove that the limit is not equal to 2.999?

While the graph may give us a visual understanding of the function, it is not a formal proof. We need to use the epsilon-delta definition to prove the limit.

4. What is the significance of the value 2.999 in this limit?

The value 2.999 is the approximation of the limit of (x->1) x^2 + 2. It is not the exact value, and we need to prove that it is not equal to the limit of 3.

5. Is it possible for the limit (x->1) x^2 + 2 to equal 2.999?

No, it is not possible for the limit to equal 2.999 because the function is continuous and the limit of a continuous function is equal to the value of the function at that point, which is 3 in this case. Therefore, the limit cannot be equal to any other value, including 2.999.

Similar threads

Replies
3
Views
904
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Calculus
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
13
Views
2K
Replies
11
Views
968
Replies
1
Views
901
Back
Top