Gluon Contribution to Baryon Mass

In summary, the mass equivalence of the energy contained in the gluons interaction can be added to the gravitational field generated by the baryon, contributing to its rest mass. While an electric field also has a mass equivalence, it cannot be gravitationally attracted and does not have inertial mass. Gluons, on the other hand, strongly interact and can contribute significantly to the mass of baryons, even though they are massless themselves. This is due to their interaction with the strong force and their ability to interact directly with other gluons. It is the combination of these factors that allows gluons to add mass to baryons.
  • #1
cbd1
123
1
I am confused as to how the mass equivalence of the the 3 gluons in at nucleon can give rise to an increase in the baryon's rest mass.

I can see how the mass equivalence of the energy contained in the gluons interaction can be added to the the amount of gravitational field generated by the particle, but not how it can add to it's inertial mass.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
cbd1 said:
When you add energy equivalency in the the form of heat to an object, it's rest (inertial) mass does not increase.
Why not ? It's sure is tiny, but can be calculated.
 
  • #3
It's not tiny. Most of the mass of a proton is in the glue field.

An electric field E has a mass ~VE2/c2, right? (Because E2 is an energy density) The same thing happens with the strong force.
 
  • #4
But an electric field cannot be gravitationally attracted. And it also does not have inertia..

Like I was asking, where and how does the energy equivalence of the gluons become inertial mass? Sure, gluons have a mass equivalence, but they do not have mass like the quarks do. What gives them mass all of a sudden when they tie quarks together?
 
  • #5
Vanadium 50 said:
It's not tiny. Most of the mass of a proton is in the glue field.
Yes ! Of course, I meant "in the case of heat, it's tiny".
 
  • #6
cbd1 said:
But an electric field cannot be gravitationally attracted.
Yes, it can. A photon is indeed trapped in a black hole (whence the name).
 
  • #7
A photon is trapped in a black hole due to no paths leading out, not due to its having gravitational mass.
 
  • #8
cbd1 said:
A photon is trapped in a black hole due to no paths leading out, not due to its having gravitational mass.
Yes that is correct. It remains that a photon will be deviated by a BH. If I decide to put a BH nearby the path of a photon, the BH will deflect the photon. The metric field couples to the energy-momentum tensor, which the photon carries as well.
 
  • #9
Photons have no inertial or gravitational mass. They are deviated by geodesics, or the "curvature" of spacetime, not pulled on by gravity. Besides, this is not my question.

Once again, what is it that makes the massless gluon add mass to baryons? They have not inertial mass, yet they (are theorized) to add most of the inertial mass to the baryons they help form. How?

Please, someone with an understanding of this specific question, reply.
 
  • #10
cbd1 said:
Photons have no inertial or gravitational mass. They are deviated by geodesics, or the "curvature" of spacetime, not pulled on by gravity. Besides, this is not my question.

Once again, what is it that makes the massless gluon add mass to baryons? They have not inertial mass, yet they (are theorized) to add most of the inertial mass to the baryons they help form. How?

Please, someone with an understanding of this specific question, reply.


This thread

https://www.physicsforums.com/showthread.php?p=2687206"

explained the sources of mass in the proton. The main contribution is the energy due to the quark/gluon field binding the baryon together.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #11
The only difference between photons and gluons is that photons do not interact (at least not in leading order), whereas gluons do strongly interact. That's the reason why gluons do contribute so much to the baryon masses.
 
Last edited:
  • #12
cbd1 said:
They are deviated by geodesics, or the "curvature" of spacetime, not pulled on by gravity.

Sorry if this is off topic, but what's the difference?
 
  • #13
cbd1 said:
But an electric field cannot be gravitationally attracted. And it also does not have inertia..

Why do you say that?

Which has more mass, a charged or uncharged capacitor? And where is the energy stored?
 
  • #14
Thanks Tom,
tom.stoer said:
The only difference between photons and gluons is that photons do not interact (at least not in leading order), whereas gluons do strongly interact. That's the reason why gluons do contribute so much to the baryon masses.

I see that gluons interact with the strong force as well as mediate it. But I am still at a loss of how the gluon interacting with the strong interaction field gives it mass all of a sudden. You would think there would have to be some kind of mechanism. I know physicists have calculated equations that say the quarks make mass somehow, but could you expand on how "interacting" gives the quarks mass, in words?
 
Last edited:
  • #15
Vanadium 50 said:
Why do you say that?

Which has more mass, a charged or uncharged capacitor? And where is the energy stored?

I don't know. Are there experiments that have proven this? Does a charged battery weigh more on a scale than an uncharged battery?
 
  • #16
cbd1 said:
Thanks Tom,


I see that quarks interact with the strong force as well as mediate it. But I am still at a loss of how the gluon interacting with the strong interaction field gives it mass all of a sudden. You would think there would have to be some kind of mechanism. I know physicists have calculated equations that say the quarks make mass somehow, but could you expand on how "interacting" gives the quarks mass, in words?

You are confusing quarks and gluons.
Quarks are particles of matter. Three quarks make a nucleon. They do not mediate the strong force. Gluons are force carrying particles.
It is similar to electromagnetism. Electrons (matter particles) interact with other electrons by exchange of photons (force carriers). However gluon, unlike photon, can also interact directly with another gluon.
 
  • #17
Sorry, I accidentally put 'quarks' where I meant 'gluons'. Fixed that in the post.
 
  • #18
cbd1 said:
Thanks Tom,


I see that gluons interact with the strong force as well as mediate it. But I am still at a loss of how the gluon interacting with the strong interaction field gives it mass all of a sudden. You would think there would have to be some kind of mechanism. I know physicists have calculated equations that say the quarks make mass somehow, but could you expand on how "interacting" gives the quarks mass, in words?

It's not the fact of the interaction, per se, that creates mass. Let me see if I can clarify this. In relativity, when we speak of mass, we're usually talking about the invariant mass. This is what we would measure directly by putting an object on a scale, since it's rather hard to weigh anything that isn't sitting still. An object's invariant mass is given by the length of its 4-momentum vector:
[tex]m = \sqrt{p^\mu p_\mu} = \sqrt{E^2-|\vec{p}|^2},[/tex]
where I'm implicitly using units in which c = 1.

For a single photon or gluon, this will be 0. However, for a system of multiple particles, we have to sum the 4-momenta before squaring. Thus, the mass of a composite system looks like
[tex]m = \sqrt{\left(\sum_i E_i\right)^2-\left|\sum_i \vec{p}_i\right|^2}.[/tex]
Because of the vector sum of 3-momenta, a system of multiple massless particles can actually have a net non-zero rest mass.

This is where the interaction comes in. The nature of the strong force means that quarks and gluons only exist in bound states; and, the mass of the bound state must be determined as I showed above. If the bound state is at rest, the momentum sum will be 0; but, the energy sum will depend on the strength of the binding force, leading to a prediction for the mass of the bound state.

Does this clarify anything?
 
  • #19
cbd1 said:
Does a charged battery weigh more on a scale than an uncharged battery?

It must, although by an immeasurably tiny amount. The Principle of Equivalence mandates this.
 
  • #20
Parlyne said:
It's not the fact of the interaction, per se, that creates mass. Let me see if I can clarify this. In relativity, when we speak of mass, we're usually talking about the invariant mass. This is what we would measure directly by putting an object on a scale, since it's rather hard to weigh anything that isn't sitting still. An object's invariant mass is given by the length of its 4-momentum vector:
[tex]m = \sqrt{p^\mu p_\mu} = \sqrt{E^2-|\vec{p}|^2},[/tex]
where I'm implicitly using units in which c = 1.

For a single photon or gluon, this will be 0. However, for a system of multiple particles, we have to sum the 4-momenta before squaring. Thus, the mass of a composite system looks like
[tex]m = \sqrt{\left(\sum_i E_i\right)^2-\left|\sum_i \vec{p}_i\right|^2}.[/tex]
Because of the vector sum of 3-momenta, a system of multiple massless particles can actually have a net non-zero rest mass.

This is where the interaction comes in. The nature of the strong force means that quarks and gluons only exist in bound states; and, the mass of the bound state must be determined as I showed above. If the bound state is at rest, the momentum sum will be 0; but, the energy sum will depend on the strength of the binding force, leading to a prediction for the mass of the bound state.

Does this clarify anything?

Yes. This helps me to see that when the components are counted individually, it seems that the gluons will have no mass, but when the quantum system of quarks and gluons are calculated together, we see that there is a much different result for mass.

In this case, it does seem that the equations help in understanding. So, in words, it is not so much that the gluons themselves gain mass when binding quarks, but that the system of quarks and gluons results in the total particle having mass.
 

What is a gluon?

A gluon is a subatomic particle that carries the strong nuclear force, one of the four fundamental forces of nature. It is a type of boson, meaning it has integer spin, and is responsible for holding quarks together to form protons and neutrons.

How do gluons contribute to baryon mass?

Gluons contribute to baryon mass by mediating the strong nuclear force between quarks. This force is responsible for binding quarks together to form protons and neutrons, which are the building blocks of baryons. Without the strong force, baryons would not have mass.

How do gluons interact with quarks?

Gluons interact with quarks through the strong nuclear force. They are constantly being exchanged between quarks, creating a strong force field that holds the quarks together. This interaction is described by the theory of quantum chromodynamics (QCD).

What is the role of gluons in the Standard Model of particle physics?

Gluons play a crucial role in the Standard Model of particle physics. They are one of the fundamental particles in the theory, along with quarks, leptons, and other bosons. The Standard Model describes the interactions between these particles and has been successful in predicting and explaining many experimental observations.

Can gluons be observed directly?

No, gluons cannot be observed directly. They are confined within the strong force field and cannot exist independently. However, their effects can be observed through the interactions between quarks and other particles. Gluons can also be indirectly detected in high-energy particle collisions, such as those at the Large Hadron Collider.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
0
Views
412
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
17
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
873
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
791
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top