Symplectic but Not Complex Manifolds.

In summary, every complex manifold can be given a symplectic structure, but not every symplectic manifold can be given a complex structure. Examples of symplectic manifolds that do not admit a complex structure include the Hopf surface S^1 x S^3 and the circle bundle over a circle bundle over the 2-torus. These examples were discovered by Ana Cana da Silva and Ferdandez-Gotay-Gray, respectively. Gompf also discovered non-Kahler symplectic manifolds in the 80's, using a surgery construction.
  • #1
Bacle2
Science Advisor
1,089
10
Hi, All:
AFAIK, every complex manifold can be given a symplectic structure, by using

w:=dz/\dz^ , where dz^ is the conjugate of dz, i.e., this form is closed,

and symplectic. Still, I think the opposite is not true, i.e., not every symplectic

manifold can be given a complex structure. Does anyone know of examples/results?

I heard something about an equivalence between Lefschetz fibrations (or pencils)

and existence of symplectic structures, but I cannot think of examples.

Any Ideas?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Bacle2 said:
Hi, All:
AFAIK, every complex manifold can be given a symplectic structure, by using

w:=dz/\dz^ , where dz^ is the conjugate of dz, i.e., this form is closed,

and symplectic.

But this form is defined only locally. And trying to patch it globally, you may lose closedness. In her (free, available on her website) book, Ana Cana da Silva mentions the Hopf surface S^1 x S^3 as a complex manifold that does not admit a symplectic structure (obviously since H^2(S^1 x S^3) = 0 x H^2(S^3)=0.) See p.122.

Bacle2 said:
Still, I think the opposite is not true, i.e., not every symplectic

manifold can be given a complex structure. Does anyone know of examples/results?

For this Silva gives a reference for an example of Ferdandez-Gotay-Gray that is a circle bundle over a circle bundle over the 2-torus. (p.121)
 
  • #3
Bacle, I think you mean to say that every Kahler manifold can be given a symplectic structure. That the converse is not true is much more delicate. Gompf discovered non-Kahler symplectic manifolds in the 80's, using some surgery construction to produce symplectic manifolds that do not satisfy the Hodge decomposition on cohomology.
 
  • #4
Thanks, both for your comments, refs., I will look into them.
 
  • #5


I would first like to clarify the definitions of a symplectic manifold and a complex manifold. A symplectic manifold is a smooth manifold equipped with a non-degenerate, closed 2-form called a symplectic form. A complex manifold, on the other hand, is a smooth manifold equipped with a complex structure, which is a smooth choice of complex coordinates on the manifold.

Based on these definitions, it is indeed true that every complex manifold can be given a symplectic structure, as complex coordinates can be used to define a symplectic form. However, the opposite is not necessarily true. Not every symplectic manifold can be given a complex structure.

One example of a symplectic but not complex manifold is the 4-dimensional symplectic manifold known as the K3 surface. This manifold has a symplectic form, but it does not have a complex structure. This was proven by mathematician Kunihiko Kodaira in 1957.

There are also other examples of symplectic manifolds that do not admit a complex structure, such as certain toric varieties and symplectic 6-manifolds with minimal models. In general, it is a difficult problem to determine which symplectic manifolds can be given a complex structure.

As for the equivalence between Lefschetz fibrations and symplectic structures, this is known as the SYZ conjecture and has been studied extensively in recent years. However, it remains a conjecture and has not been fully proven.

In conclusion, while every complex manifold can be given a symplectic structure, the opposite is not true. There are examples of symplectic manifolds that do not admit a complex structure, and this remains an active area of research in mathematics.
 

1. What is a symplectic but not complex manifold?

A symplectic but not complex manifold is a type of mathematical space that has both symplectic and complex structures. This means that it can be described using both symplectic geometry, which studies geometric structures related to the concept of area, and complex geometry, which studies geometric structures related to the concept of holomorphic functions.

2. How is a symplectic but not complex manifold different from a symplectic or complex manifold?

A symplectic but not complex manifold differs from a symplectic or complex manifold in that it has both symplectic and complex structures. This means that it can be studied using tools and techniques from both symplectic and complex geometry, as opposed to being limited to just one of these areas of mathematics.

3. What are some examples of symplectic but not complex manifolds?

Examples of symplectic but not complex manifolds include the cotangent bundle of a manifold, the space of Hermitian matrices, and the space of almost complex structures on a manifold. These are all spaces that have both symplectic and complex structures and can be studied using techniques from both symplectic and complex geometry.

4. What are the applications of studying symplectic but not complex manifolds?

The study of symplectic but not complex manifolds has applications in various areas of mathematics and physics. It is used in the study of Hamiltonian mechanics, which is a fundamental theory in classical mechanics. It also has applications in algebraic geometry, differential geometry, and mathematical physics.

5. What are some open problems in the study of symplectic but not complex manifolds?

One open problem in the study of symplectic but not complex manifolds is the classification of almost complex structures on a given manifold. Another open problem is the existence and classification of symplectic but not complex structures on a given manifold. These problems are actively being studied by mathematicians and there is still much to be discovered in this field.

Similar threads

  • Differential Geometry
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
5
Views
416
Replies
4
Views
128
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Topology and Analysis
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Differential Geometry
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
3K
Back
Top