Uncovering the Mystery of Mass Gain in Special Relativity

  • Thread starter Ralphonsicus
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Particles
In summary, as objects approach the speed of light, they gain mass-energy according to Special Relativity. However, this increase in mass-energy does not come from any internal changes in the object but rather from the energy used to accelerate it. This concept of "relativistic mass" is no longer used in physics and is seen as misleading. The mass gain is simply what the observer sees as a result of the energy put into the object.
  • #1
Ralphonsicus
47
0
As objects approach the speed of light, according to Special Relativity, they gain mass. But when this happens, what does the mass come in the form of?

The first thing that comes to mind would be matter and antimatter. But if this is so, wouldn't they just annihilate, and do so in a fury as more matter and antimatter are added to the object?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It isn't really the MASS that increases, it is the mass-energy, and the increase comes from the energy expended in causing the acceleration.
 
  • #3
The mass gain is what the observer sees resulting from the energy put into the particle to make it speed up. In the frame of the particle itself, the mass is unchanged.
 
  • #4
It doesn't "come from" anything. In my experience it's really not even all that common to talk about relativistic mass, we usually just write energy in terms of rest mass (which is invariant). It's a bit of a misleading concept anyway, because it implies (as you seem to have the impression) that it is related to some internal change in the object -- it's not.

It more or less comes from the fact that mass-energy (rest mass, that is) can be written [itex] E_{0} = mc^{2} [/itex]

For a particle moving relative to an observer, the energy of the particle would be measured by the observer to be [itex] E = \gamma mc^{2} [/itex]

Thus you can write [itex] m_{rel} = \frac{E}{c^2} = \gamma m [/itex], where [itex] m [/itex] is the rest mass, equating [itex] E_{0} [/itex] with [itex] E [/itex] but again, it's kind of an ambiguous and misleading concept.
 
  • #5
mathman said:
The mass gain is what the observer sees resulting from the energy put into the particle to make it speed up.
That concept of a "relativistic mass" is not used any more in physics - it just remains in old textbooks and bad web pages.
 

1. What are mass-gaining particles?

Mass-gaining particles, also known as Higgs bosons, are subatomic particles that are responsible for giving other particles their mass. They were first theorized in the 1960s and were discovered in 2012 by the Large Hadron Collider at CERN.

2. How do mass-gaining particles work?

Mass-gaining particles interact with other particles through the Higgs field, which is an invisible field that permeates the entire universe. When particles interact with the Higgs field, they gain mass. This is similar to how objects gain weight when moving through water.

3. Why are mass-gaining particles important?

Understanding mass-gaining particles is important because it helps us understand the fundamental forces and building blocks of the universe. It also helps explain why some particles have mass while others do not.

4. Can mass-gaining particles be observed?

Yes, mass-gaining particles can be observed indirectly through their interactions with other particles. They can also be detected directly in high-energy particle collisions, such as those at the Large Hadron Collider.

5. How do mass-gaining particles impact our daily lives?

While mass-gaining particles may seem abstract and far removed from our daily lives, they actually play a crucial role in the functioning of the universe and the formation of matter. Without mass-gaining particles, atoms would not have mass and therefore could not form the complex structures that make up our world, including ourselves.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
844
Back
Top