What Do You Think About Transhumanism?

  • Thread starter Niels Bohr
  • Start date
In summary, Transhumanism is a technological and philosophical movement focused on augmenting the human brain and body, as well as creating artificial life forms. It embraces various technologies such as genetic engineering, nanotechnology, and cryonics, with the goal of increasing individual IQs and lifespan, as well as improving physical robustness. Transhumanists also hope to create new materials to replace the fragile human body. There are different branches of Transhumanism, with varying political beliefs, but the movement overall distances itself from any form of eugenics. The debate over whether humans should choose to upgrade themselves through technology is seen as a major societal issue.
  • #1
Niels Bohr
14
0
See http://www.transhumanism.org/ Basically, the technological/philosophical movement of Transhumanism is to create technology that can be applied to augmenting the human brain and body, as well as the creation of artificial life forms (consider tv shows with characters such as Data from Star Trek: The Next Generation). Transhumanism embraces technologies such as genetic engineering, gene therapy, nanotechnology, cryonics, cyborg technology, cloning, and other futuristic/exotic types of procedures. They hope to increase individual IQs to astronomical levels, as well increase life-span without any limits. Physical robustness is also important, preventing body decay. Organic bodies are fragile, so if possible, a new material is desired to replace the current body type common to Homo Sapiens.

Regards,

Niels Bohr
 
Last edited:
Computer science news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think transhumanism is wonderful. Whether or not humans should choose to upgrade themselves technologically may turn out to become the most important societal issue of the 21st century. Before automatically dismissing such ideas as either unethical or bad sci-fi, it's probably a good idea to acquaint yourself with the other side's arguments, if you haven't already (e.g. the http://www.transhumanism.org/resources/faq.html [Broken]). I think you may find them much more sensible than the "loony frozen heads cult" image sometimes spread by the media. :wink:

Data and other TV AIs are http://www.singinst.org/CFAI/anthro.html#movie [Broken] of what to expect in reality, though.

Also, I should point out that transhumanism has nothing to do with the "neo-eugenics" stuff Niels Bohr has been posting about. Mainstream transhumanism explicitly distances itself from such movements.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
Lol, in a world like this, I'm not sure I'd want to live any longer than 80 or 90 years. Ask me again when I'm 70...:wink:

I think ultimately we have to accept ourselves for what we are. Science may, one day, if it is permitted to continue along the present trend, be able to patch up the human body with cybernetic or genetically 'grown' spare parts, but we're like tyres: there's only so many times it can be repared.

Science is becoming a powerful thing these days, but the question isn't necessarily 'can we do it?', but 'if you were able to do it, would you honestly choose to?'

I'm not entirely sure that I would.
 
  • #4
Lol, in a world like this, I'm not sure I'd want to live any longer than 80 or 90 years.

Over centuries, the world will not stay the same. If I lived forever, I could think of a lot of things to do and to learn even now. Transhuman technologies may well increase the space of things to do, and allow you to edit your mind to become who you want (redesign your motivations, become more intelligent, and so on).

Science may, one day, if it is permitted to continue along the present trend, be able to patch up the human body with cybernetic or genetically 'grown' spare parts, but we're like tyres: there's only so many times it can be repared.

Life extension (possibly immortality) is only one aspect of transhumanism, and replacing parts would only be one way of extending lifespan (not necessarily the most interesting one).

Science is becoming a powerful thing these days, but the question isn't necessarily 'can we do it?', but 'if you were able to do it, would you honestly choose to?'

This is true. Some people would choose to use advanced technologies, some wouldn't. The alternative to letting people decide for themselves is to decide for everyone by halting technological progress on a global scale. So far, I don't think I've seen a plan to achieve a long-term technologically stagnant society that didn't directly or indirectly involve the collapse of civilization.

Trying to get everyone on the planet to relinquish large areas of science and technology seems futile to me; what we can do is to try to ensure that these technologies will be used responsibly (e.g. nanotech) and that the future contains humane beings (e.g. AI).
 
  • #5
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Originally posted by Carlos Hernandez
and then the Conservative Transhumanists are Transtopia (http://www.transtopia.org/) and Plausible Futures (http://www.plausiblefutures.com/)

That's more of a twig than a branch, though. Most transhumanists wouldn't see "neo-eugenics" (which as far as I can tell is even further removed than the sites you mention) as part of the transhuman tree at all. This doesn't seem unfair to me, considering that transhumanism is about going beyond the human condition, not about breeding a master race or any of that tripe.

Also, you make it seem like WTA and Extropy are denominations like Catholicism and Protestantism are to Christianity. While it's true that Extropy tends to be more libertarian and WTA tends to be more social-democratic (as well as trying to be more of an umbrella organization), neither is wedded to any political ideology. They're more like organizations working toward similar goals with different emphasis than like mutually exclusive factions.
 
Last edited:
  • #7
Ontoplankton,

Why don't you get a leading Transhumanist figure to post daily tech news here? Eugene Leitl's Transhumantech list is getting no exposer, it would nice if he just posted all his tech and science news here. Or someone can post the daily betterhumans.com stories here. I don't have the time personally, plus you probably would not want Transhumanism to be affiliated with me.

Carlos Hernandez
 

1. What is Transhumanism?

Transhumanism is a philosophical and social movement that advocates for the use of technology to enhance human physical and cognitive abilities. It also aims to overcome limitations of the human body and extend human lifespan through advancements in science and technology.

2. What are the potential benefits of Transhumanism?

Some potential benefits of Transhumanism include improved physical and cognitive abilities, increased lifespan, and the ability to eliminate genetic diseases. It also has the potential to enhance human creativity, intelligence, and overall well-being.

3. What are the potential risks of Transhumanism?

Some potential risks of Transhumanism include the exacerbation of social inequalities, unintended consequences of genetic engineering, and the loss of what it means to be human. Additionally, there are ethical concerns surrounding the use of technology to alter the human body and mind.

4. How does Transhumanism relate to artificial intelligence?

Transhumanism and artificial intelligence (AI) are closely related as both aim to enhance human abilities through technology. Transhumanists believe that AI can be used to augment human intelligence and potentially lead to a merging of human and machine intelligence.

5. What are some current examples of Transhumanism in practice?

Some current examples of Transhumanism in practice include the use of prosthetics to enhance physical abilities, brain-computer interfaces to control technology with the mind, and the use of gene editing technology to eliminate genetic diseases. Additionally, the development of AI and virtual reality technologies can also be seen as aspects of Transhumanism.

Similar threads

  • Computing and Technology
Replies
12
Views
6K
  • Science Fiction and Fantasy Media
2
Replies
51
Views
7K
  • STEM Academic Advising
Replies
5
Views
2K
Back
Top