Is there another way for nuclear reactor?

In summary: Double electron capture is an idea that has been around for a while, and has been studied in some detail, but it is not currently possible to do it effectively. Captured electrons would just be lost as heat or radiation.
  • #1
MagikRevolver
46
0
I know we use radioactive elements in nuclear reactors and the heat given of to generate electricity in the traditional steam driven turbine way, at least that's what I read. I was wondering why we can't make it more efficient through double electron capture and use captured electrons given off in the form of radiation to be the electricity in itself. I know it is obviously not easy or perhaps near impossible, otherwise it would have been done. But I was wondering why it can't?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't know what kind of reaction you are talking about now. First double electron capture, and then you want to use the captured electrons given off in the radiation to be the electricity? In electron capture, electrons are fusing with a proton in the nucleus, converting it into a neutron + neutrino. So i see no way to gain energy from this. You must first have a large electron beam to make nucleus capture electrons (very small cross section for electron captures in general), and then you only gain some neutrinos that you can't catch.
 
  • #3
MagikRevolver said:
I know we use radioactive elements in nuclear reactors and the heat given of to generate electricity in the traditional steam driven turbine way, at least that's what I read. I was wondering why we can't make it more efficient through double electron capture and use captured electrons given off in the form of radiation to be the electricity in itself. I know it is obviously not easy or perhaps near impossible, otherwise it would have been done. But I was wondering why it can't?

Reactors get their energy as a result of nuclear fission. There is also some significant energy from the radioactive fission products. However the U235 and Pu239 both have long half-lives so their radioactivity contributes essentially nothing to the energy output.
 

1. Is nuclear energy the only option for producing electricity?

No, there are alternative sources of energy such as solar, wind, hydro, and geothermal power that can also be used to generate electricity.

2. What are the potential risks and drawbacks of nuclear reactors?

The main risks associated with nuclear reactors include the possibility of accidents and meltdowns, the storage and disposal of nuclear waste, and the risk of nuclear materials being used for weapons. Additionally, the construction and operation of nuclear reactors can be costly and may not be feasible in certain areas.

3. Are there any new technologies being developed for nuclear reactors?

Yes, there are ongoing efforts to develop new and advanced nuclear reactor designs that address some of the issues with traditional reactors. These include small modular reactors, molten salt reactors, and fusion reactors which aim to be safer, more efficient, and produce less nuclear waste.

4. Can nuclear waste be safely stored and disposed of?

While there are currently methods for storing and disposing of nuclear waste, there is still ongoing research and development to find more sustainable and long-term solutions. Some proposed solutions include deep geological repositories and advanced reprocessing techniques.

5. How does nuclear energy compare to other sources of energy in terms of cost and efficiency?

Nuclear energy can be relatively costly to build and operate, but it can also be very efficient in terms of the amount of energy produced. However, the costs and efficiency of nuclear energy can vary depending on the specific design and location of the reactor, as well as factors such as government subsidies and regulations.

Similar threads

  • Nuclear Engineering
2
Replies
45
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
19
Views
3K
  • Nuclear Engineering
Replies
31
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Back
Top