Solve for x in terms of a, the inequality

In summary, to solve for x in terms of a in the given inequality where x and a are real numbers and a is not equal to zero, one should start by solving the corresponding equation |x^2-3ax+ 2a^2|= |x^2+ 3ax- a^2|. Then, there are three possible cases to consider: when the quantities inside the absolute values on both sides are non-negative, negative, and have opposite signs. By finding the values of x where the two sides are equal, one can determine the intervals on which one side is larger than the other. Then, by choosing one value of x in each interval and checking whether the inequality is true, the solution can be determined.
  • #1
whkoh
29
0
Solve for x in terms of a, the inequality:
[tex]
\mid x^2 - 3ax + 2a^2 \mid < \mid x^2 + 3ax - a^2 \mid
[/tex]
where [itex] x \in \mathbb{R}, a \in \mathbb{R}, a \neq 0[/itex]

Squaring both sides, I get
[tex]x^4 - 6ax^3 + 13a^2 x^2 - 12a^3 x + 4a^4 < x^4 + 6ax^3 + 7a^2 x^2 - 6a^3 x + a^4[/tex]

[tex]12ax^3 - 6a^2 x^2 + 6a^3 x - 3a^4 > 0[/tex]

[tex]4 ax^3 - 2a^2 x^2 + 2a^3 x - a^4 > 0[/tex]

Stuck here. How do I proceed?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I think the best way to deal with a non-linear inequality is to start by solving the corresponding equation: in this case [itex]|x^2-3ax+ 2a^2|= |x^2+ 3ax- a^2|[/itex]. Yes, you can get rid of the absolute value by squaring both sides but that introduces higher powers. There are three possible cases:
1) The quantities inside the absolute values on both sides are non-negative. In that case, the two absolute values are irrelevant: [itex]x^2- 3ax+ 2a^2= x^2+ 3ax- a^2[/itex] which is easy to solve.
2) The quantities inside the absolute values on both sides are negative. In that case, the absolute values are just multiplied by -1. Divide both sides by -1 and you have the same equation as in 1.
3) The quantities inside the absolute values on the two sides have opposite signs. In that case, again since we can multiply or divide by -1, it doesn't matter which side is negative: we have [itex]x^2- 3ax+ 2a^2= -(x^2+ 3ax- a^2)= -x^2- 3ax+ a^2[/itex] which just gives the quadratic equation [itex]2x^2= 3a^2[/itex], also easy to solve.

The point is that the values of x where the two sides are equal separate the intervals on which one side is larger than the other. Choose one value of x in each interval to see whether the inequality is true in that case.
 
  • #3
whkoh said:
Solve for x in terms of a, the inequality:
[tex]
\mid x^2 - 3ax + 2a^2 \mid < \mid x^2 + 3ax - a^2 \mid
[/tex]
where [itex] x \in \mathbb{R}, a \in \mathbb{R}, a \neq 0[/itex]

Squaring both sides, I get
[tex]x^4 - 6ax^3 + 13a^2 x^2 - 12a^3 x + 4a^4 < x^4 + 6ax^3 + 7a^2 x^2 - 6a^3 x + a^4[/tex]

[tex]12ax^3 - 6a^2 x^2 + 6a^3 x - 3a^4 > 0[/tex]

[tex]4 ax^3 - 2a^2 x^2 + 2a^3 x - a^4 > 0[/tex]

Stuck here. How do I proceed?
When squaring both sides, you seem to be missing a 9a2x2 on both sides, but it's okay, since they will cancel each other out.
---------------------------
[tex]4 ax ^ 3 - 2a ^ 2 x ^ 2 + 2a ^ 3 x - a ^ 4 > 0[/tex].
This is so far okay. To continue, you should factor it:
[tex]4 ax ^ 3 - 2a ^ 2 x ^ 2 + 2a ^ 3 x - a ^ 4 > 0[/tex]
[tex]\Leftrightarrow 2a x ^ 2 (2x - a) + a ^ 3 (2x - a) > 0[/tex]
[tex]\Leftrightarrow (2x - a) (2a x ^ 2 + a ^ 3) > 0[/tex]
[tex]\Leftrightarrow a (2x - a) (2x ^ 2 + a ^ 2) > 0[/tex]
Note that 2x2 + a2 is already non-negative, so can you go from here?
 
  • #4
Great, thanks for the help!
 

1. What does it mean to "solve for x in terms of a" in an inequality?

Solving for x in terms of a means finding an expression for x in relation to a, where a is a fixed variable. In other words, we want to find a way to express x in terms of a, rather than as a specific numerical value.

2. How is solving for x in terms of a different from solving for x in an equation?

In an equation, we are looking for a specific value of x that makes the equation true. In an inequality, we are looking for a range of values for x that satisfy the inequality. Solving for x in terms of a in an inequality means finding a general solution rather than a specific numerical solution.

3. Can you provide an example of solving for x in terms of a in an inequality?

Sure. Let's say we have the inequality 3x + 2 > 5a. To solve for x in terms of a, we would first subtract 2 from both sides to get 3x > 5a - 2. Then, we divide both sides by 3 to get x > (5a - 2)/3. This is our solution for x in terms of a.

4. Why is it important to solve for x in terms of a in an inequality?

Solving for x in terms of a allows us to understand the relationship between x and a in the inequality. It also helps us to see the range of values that x can take on to satisfy the inequality, which is useful in many real-world applications.

5. Are there any special rules or techniques for solving for x in terms of a in an inequality?

Yes, there are some key rules to keep in mind when solving for x in terms of a in an inequality. These include reversing the direction of the inequality sign when dividing or multiplying by a negative number, and being careful to keep track of the inequality sign when solving for x using algebraic manipulations.

Similar threads

  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
940
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
9
Views
788
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
908
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
5
Views
815
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Precalculus Mathematics Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top