Register to reply

Why does the Schwinger parameter correspond to proper length?

Share this thread:
Dilatino
#1
Dec21-13, 03:30 PM
P: 5
I have just learned from nice article

http://motls.blogspot.com/2013/12/ed...y-quantum.html

that the propagator of a massive particle can be rewritten as an integral over the so-called Schwinger parameter t as

$$
\frac{1}{p^2 + m^2} = \int\limits_0^\infty dt \exp(-t(p^2 + m^2))
$$

In addition, in the blog article it is said that this Schwinger parameter p can be interpreted as the proper length of the propagator. I dont see this, so can somebody give a derivation/further explanation?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
'Squid skin' metamaterials project yields vivid color display
Team finds elusive quantum transformations near absolute zero
Scientists control surface tension to manipulate liquid metals (w/ Video)
Spinnor
#2
Dec21-13, 03:49 PM
P: 1,375
Using Wolfram Alpha,

http://www.wolframalpha.com/input/?i...%5B-at%5D%29dt

input,

integral from 0 to infinity of ( exp[-at])dt

output,

1/a
fzero
#3
Dec21-13, 04:17 PM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,602
There's a nice clear presentation of the argument given in the 1951 Schwinger paper at http://www.thetangentbundle.net/wiki...time_formalism. Post back if that doesn't help.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Is proper length measured in the same reference frame as proper time. Introductory Physics Homework 0
How does the length contraction work for proper length? Special & General Relativity 8
Length contraction from lorentz transformation. Keep messing up the proper length Special & General Relativity 10
When we use arc length as a parameter Calculus 5
Basic Calculus III- Arc Length Parameter and Length- Getting a negative length Calculus & Beyond Homework 6