Energy - Can energy be negative?

In summary, the concept of negative energy is complex and depends on the context in which it is being discussed. In certain situations, such as potential energy and the annihilation of particles, negative energy can exist. However, the total energy of a system is always positive and cannot be negative. The equation E=MC^2 is only useful when used correctly and does not result in negative mass. The possibility of negative energy has interesting implications in theories such as General Relativity, but it has not been observed and is still an open question.
  • #1
Vinay R Hegde
5
0
Energy -- Can energy be negative?

Can energy be negative? If yes,can mass be negative?(since E=mc^2)
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
I don't think energy can be negative in the sense that you mean. Binding energy is sort of negative in that it contributes negatively to the mass of a composite, i.e. the mass of an atom, for example, is less than the mass of its constituents.

In physics, energy is typically considered a scalar quantity, which means it doesn't have a negative or positive sign by itself. Instead, energy can exist in various forms, such as kinetic energy, potential energy, thermal energy, and more. The total energy in a closed system is conserved, meaning it remains constant unless acted upon by external forces. This principle is known as the conservation of energy.

However, in certain contexts, energy differences or changes can be negative. For example:

  1. Potential Energy: In a gravitational or electric potential energy context, if an object moves closer to the source of the force (e.g., falls to the ground or approaches a negative charge), its potential energy decreases, and the change in potential energy can be negative.
  2. Work Done: When calculating work done by a force on an object, the work can be negative if the force opposes the direction of motion. This indicates that energy is being transferred from the object to the surrounding environment.
  3. Change in Energy: In the context of energy conservation, if an isolated system's total energy decreases, the change in energy is considered negative.
So, while energy itself is not inherently negative, energy differences and changes can be negative when certain physical processes involve energy transfer or conversion. It's important to consider the context in which energy is being discussed to understand whether it's positive or negative.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3


It depends on your definition of energy. Potential energy can be negative, and often is. Any attractive force has a negative potential energy. If you take an electron and positron together, the total energy shrinks as you move them closer together, because the coulomb potential becomes more negative. A bound system will have the sum of potential energy and kinetic energy less than zero. However, the total energy, including the individual masses, is still positive. The total energy of any isolated system should be positive or else these systems could spontaneously appear anywhere and the vacuum would not be stable.
 
  • #4


This is a complicated question. Typically we talk about energy as the ability to perform work. The amount of energy something contains depends on many different parameters of the system in question.

For example, a container of hot liquid can be hooked up to a heat engine and the heat can be pumped to another reservoir and power the engine in the process, resulting in work. The amount of energy depends on the amount of liquid, the temperature, etc.

There is also energy that is accessible by the annihilation of particles and antiparticles. In this case the energy is the sum of the mass of the two particles plus any energy they had in their velocities relative to each other.

In the first example, once the two reservoirs of liquid reached equilibrium with each other and the engine, no more energy was available. The engine could perform no more work. Can we say that the energy is negative in any way? Sure, we can say that to get each reservoir back to their initial temperatures would require X amount of energy, and thus the system contains negative energy with respect to our end goal. Does this system have negative mass? Only if you compare the mass of the system before and after. If we measured the mass of the system we would ALWAYS measure a positive amount of mass.

The 2nd example is similar. We can say that it would require energy to get 2 photons to interact and create an electron and positron. Again, we can say that a particular way the system can be set up would require an input of energy and thus it would have "negative" energy. But, like the 1st example any measurement of mass would always be positive.
 
  • #5


A note on the equation E=MC^2. The equation is useless if you do not use it correctly. Even if the energy of a system is negative in some way it will NOT have negative mass, as you have neglected to include the actual mass of the system, which is always positive.
 
  • #6


When you filter out all the nonsense, the question is basically an open one. It'd be very nifty and useful if energy can turn negative. There are some very interesting consequences to that in General Relativity. Traversible wormholes and warp drives are way easier with negative energy. And by "easier", I mean we don't know if these things are even possible without the negative energy.

But there is no direct indication that such a thing is possible. In QM, only relative energy matters. It's really only in context of GR that negative energy makes sense, and even there simply having energy lower than zero-point might qualify.

Short answer, nobody really knows, but it hasn't been observed.
 
  • #7


There is an arbitrary setting of the zero of the energy scale. In some contexts, one can calculate a zero point energy of the vacuum. Efforts to actually calculate it in QFT usually give infinity, which is just meaningless. On the other hand, cosmology suggests that the vacuum has negative energy. Only differences in energy are meaningful, so it's probably most convenient to regard a vacuum as being at zero energy, and any thing that isn't vacuum has positive energy. The important energy quantity is the difference between an object's energy and the background vacuum. In the case of the Casimir effect, the background vacuum plays a real role.
 
  • #8


Drakkith said:
A note on the equation E=MC^2. The equation is useless if you do not use it correctly. Even if the energy of a system is negative in some way it will NOT have negative mass, as you have neglected to include the actual mass of the system, which is always positive.
If you consider the free space (with vacuum) as a state of zero energy, you can get volumes with negative energy (casimir effect). However, you need some material to get those areas, therefore the total energy is positive again.
 

1. Can energy be negative?

Yes, energy can be negative. In physics, energy is a measure of the ability to do work. It can be positive, negative, or zero. Negative energy refers to a system or object that has less energy than its reference state or zero energy level.

2. What are some examples of negative energy?

Some examples of negative energy include gravitational potential energy, which can be negative if the system is below the zero reference point, and electrical potential energy, which can be negative if the charges are of opposite signs.

3. Is negative energy the same as antimatter?

No, negative energy is not the same as antimatter. While both concepts involve negative values, negative energy refers to a measure of energy, while antimatter refers to a type of matter with properties opposite to those of normal matter.

4. Can negative energy be created or destroyed?

Negative energy cannot be created or destroyed. The law of conservation of energy states that energy cannot be created or destroyed, only transferred or converted into different forms. This applies to negative energy as well.

5. What are the implications of negative energy?

The implications of negative energy are still being studied and debated in the scientific community. Some theories propose that negative energy could potentially be used to create wormholes for faster-than-light travel, while others suggest it could be harnessed for anti-gravity technology. However, these ideas are still largely theoretical and require further research and experimentation.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
49
Views
3K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
8
Views
5K
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
468
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
36
Views
6K
Replies
11
Views
989
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
3
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
6K
Back
Top