| New Reply |
Pioneer Anomaly Explained |
Share Thread |
| Dec6-12, 03:22 PM | #1 |
|
Recognitions:
|
Pioneer Anomaly Explained |
| Dec6-12, 07:07 PM | #2 |
|
Mentor
|
From near the end of the long article:
|
| Dec6-12, 09:40 PM | #3 |
|
|
Excellent!
|
| Dec7-12, 11:49 AM | #4 |
|
|
Pioneer Anomaly Explained
No mention was made of the criticism from Anderson & Morris; see
J.D. Anderson and J.R. Morris, PRD 85, 0840817 (2012). A & M plotted the alleged "decay" of the anomaly as a function of the radius R from the sun and found that it goes almost exactly as 1/R^2. This behaviour makes it likely that the alleged decay is only an artefact due to a mismodelling of the solar radiation pressure on the spacecraft. With the "decay" of the anomaly removed, the claim that the thermal model agrees with the Doppler data to within 20% would hardly be valid. So I think that before they have explicitly refuted the criticism from Anderson & Morris, it would be unwise to draw any firm conclusions regarding the status of the anomaly. |
| Dec14-12, 06:15 PM | #5 |
|
|
I'm extremely skeptical about this "explanation" since it was one of the first dismissed by the same authors in their original paper.
Among the many dozens of explanations refuted then, thermal recoil was one of the simplest and the effect has been checked by so many people. |
| Dec14-12, 07:10 PM | #6 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
Similar discussions for: Pioneer Anomaly Explained
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Pioneer 10 Anomaly | Special & General Relativity | 7 | ||
| The Pioneer Anomaly | General Astronomy | 9 | ||
| Pioneer anomaly | Astrophysics | 1 | ||
| The Pioneer Anomaly | General Astronomy | 65 | ||
| Oh my God, the Pioneer Anomaly again? | General Physics | 0 | ||