Twin paradox with circular motion

In summary, the conversation discusses a variation of the twin paradox involving a traveling sibling with uniform circular motion. The acceleration of the sibling is g at all times, pointing towards the center of the circular path. The trip takes 20 years for the traveler, but the inertial observer sees a different amount of time elapsed. The equations 2pi R=vT and v^2=Rg can be used to find the radius and velocity, but there is a discrepancy with the calculated velocity being over three times the speed of light. This is due to ambiguity in the statement about the acceleration and can be resolved by considering the acceleration in the Earth system versus the rest system. Using the units of light years, the discrepancy is lessened.
  • #1
Urd
2
0

Homework Statement


A variation on the twin paradox, with uniform circular motion. The traveling sibling moves so that his acceleration is g at all times, pointing to the centre of his circular path, constant velocity. There is given that the trip takes twenty years in the frame of the traveller. Then how long will the astronaut be gone as seen by the inertial observer?


Homework Equations





The Attempt at a Solution


I have an expression for the time elapsed (as seen by the inertial observer) in function of radius and velocity. And as I'm unable to calculate radius or velocity for this problem, I am stuck.
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You have two equations:
2pi R=vT (T=20 years), and v^2=Rg.
Solve for R and v.
 
  • #3
When I use these equations, the velocity is more then three times the speed of light?
 
  • #4
The statement "his acceleration is g at all times" is ambiguous.
If it refers to his acceleration in the Earth system, you do get v~3c.
It must mean his acceleration in his rest system. In that case,
a in the Earth system is a=g(1-v^2/c^2), and
The centripetal equation becomes v^2=Ra=Rg(1-v^2/c^2), which eventually gives v<c.
Incidentally, if you work with LY (light years), then c=1 and g~1.
 

What is the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion?

The Twin Paradox with Circular Motion is a thought experiment in the field of special relativity that involves two identical twins, one of whom remains stationary on Earth while the other travels on a circular path at high speeds in a spaceship. This experiment is used to illustrate the principles of time dilation and the effects of acceleration on time perception.

What is the main question posed by the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion?

The main question posed by the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion is: how does time pass differently for the twin traveling at high speeds compared to the twin remaining stationary on Earth?

What is the answer to the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion?

The answer to the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion is that time passes slower for the traveling twin due to time dilation, which is a consequence of the theory of special relativity. This means that when the traveling twin returns to Earth, they will have aged less than their twin who remained on Earth.

How does acceleration affect the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion?

Acceleration plays a crucial role in the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion. When the traveling twin accelerates to high speeds, they experience time dilation, which causes time to pass slower for them compared to the stationary twin on Earth. This effect is reversed when the traveling twin decelerates and returns to Earth.

Is the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion a real phenomenon?

No, the Twin Paradox with Circular Motion is a thought experiment used to explain the principles of special relativity. While it may seem counterintuitive, it has been confirmed through experiments and is well-supported by the scientific community.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
643
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
12
Views
935
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
715
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
70
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
1K
Back
Top