Register to reply 
Euler's number 
Share this thread: 
#1
Apr1914, 01:12 PM

P: 38

Can anyone give me a good definition of Euler's number and its significance. I see it everywhere, it's prolific in science and engineering.



#2
Apr1914, 01:31 PM

Mentor
P: 18,036



#3
Apr1914, 01:49 PM

P: 1,196

There are two standard definitions:
[itex] e = lim_{ n \to \infty} (1+\frac{1}{n})^n[/itex] [itex] e = 1 + \frac{1}{2!} + \frac{1}{3!} + \frac{1}{4!} + \ldots [/itex] The first one is the result of constructing a function, [itex]y = exp(t)[/itex] that solves the differential equation [itex]y = y' [/itex] with the initial condition [itex]y(0) = 1[/itex] using Euler's method with step size 1/n and taking the limit as n goes to infinity. Euler's method is glorified name for following a slope field (or vector field if the dimension is greater than 1) along to approximate a solution. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler_method You could call this solution [itex]y = exp(t)[/itex]. It then turns out that [itex]exp(a+b) = exp(a)exp(b)[/itex]. This gives us a lot of information about the function. For example, [itex]exp(5) = 5exp(1)[/itex] and [itex]1 = exp(11) = exp(1)exp(1)[/itex], so [itex]exp(1) = 1/exp(1)[/itex]. So, this is looking a lot like a function [itex]a^t[/itex]. If you argue further along these lines, you see that that is indeed the case. So, we define [itex]e = exp(1)[/itex]. It then follows that [itex]e^t = exp(t)[/itex], so this function, [itex]exp(t)[/itex] that solves the differential equation turns out to be some number, which we call e, raised to the power t. You can also interpret the limit using compound interest (or any form of growth with constant relative rate, like population growth). Khan Academy explains it well from this point of view, for example. The 2nd formula for e solves the same differential equation, using power series, rather than Euler's method. The differential equation with initial condition determines a power series for [itex]e^x[/itex] and when you plug in x = 1, you get the formula for e. 


#4
Apr1914, 02:12 PM

Sci Advisor
P: 2,683

Euler's number



#5
Apr1914, 02:48 PM

P: 1,196

Oops, I meant exp(5) = exp(1)^5.



#6
Apr2014, 07:59 AM

HW Helper
P: 2,944

Ambiguous. You should write exp(5) = [exp(1)]^5 But there's nothing special about that since you're just saying x^5 = (x)^5 


#7
Apr2014, 08:05 AM

Mentor
P: 18,036




Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Number theory  euler's phi function  Calculus & Beyond Homework  3  
Euler's Phi function Number Theory  Calculus & Beyond Homework  8  
E Euler Number  General Math  12  
Euler number  Differential Geometry  0  
What i call the second Euler's Number  Calculus  4 