ICAL THEORY: Global Warming & Its Impact

In summary: It is known that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere between 1800 and 2005 has increased from 280 to 380 parts per million. It is known without doubt that this increase is due to human burning of fossil fuels, and not to natural sources such as the oceans or volcanoes. Here are three arguments. First of all, there was a parallel decline of the 14C/12C ratio. Second, there was a parallel decline of the 13C/12C ratio. Finally, there was a parallel decline of the oxygen concentration. All three measurements independently imply that the CO2 increase is due to the burning of fuels, which are low in 14C and in 13C, and at the same time decrease the oxygen ratio.
  • #1
RAD4921
347
1
Global warming theory
It is being observed that the earth’s atmosphere is warming up and it is speculated that carbon emissions are the cause. Since the atmosphere is getting warmer it will contain more moisture due to additional evaporation and warmer air holds more moisture than cold air. This should lead to an increase in clouds, which in turn would reflect more of the sun’s energy out into outer space, which in turn would cause the average temperature of the planet to drop.

Could it be this simple? Probably not. Weather systems are very complex and contain a lot of variables. Furthermore meteorologist run these things through supercomputers so one would think this would have been discovered already but I sure would like an expert opinion on this.

Even if this simple theory did pan out to be true it wouldn’t mean we were off the hook. Excessive moisture in the air may leads to more flooding and heavier snowfalls and may cause havoc on the world’s ecosystems.
RAD
 
Earth sciences news on Phys.org
  • #2
Permanent fog would probably keep heat in much better.
 
  • #3
Let's first separate global warming resulting from natural process from the global warming as a result of human intervention.

Note that the substances that contributes the most to global warming is water, carbon dioxide and methane. These are mostly the result from natural processes (the exception being carbon dioxide to some extent). They cover each sections of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation, where they absorb the outgoing radiation, preventing it from leaving earth.

Between them is a band where outgoing radiation is not absorbed. However, with the increased release of chlorofluorocarbons, they block this important window, hence resulting in a type of greenhouse1.

As a result, it proves rather useless to try and control water evaporation or natural methane leakage, but to focus on things that can actually be changed.

1 Salters' Advanced Chemistry: Chemical Storylines by George Burton
 
  • #4
Moridin said:
Let's first separate global warming resulting from natural process from the global warming as a result of human intervention.

Note that the substances that contributes the most to global warming is water, carbon dioxide and methane. These are mostly the result from natural processes (the exception being carbon dioxide to some extent). They cover each sections of frequencies of electromagnetic radiation, where they absorb the outgoing radiation, preventing it from leaving earth.

Between them is a band where outgoing radiation is not absorbed. However, with the increased release of chlorofluorocarbons, they block this important window, hence resulting in a type of greenhouse1.

As a result, it proves rather useless to try and control water evaporation or natural methane leakage, but to focus on things that can actually be changed.

1 Salters' Advanced Chemistry: Chemical Storylines by George Burton

I did a little research on the intenet and it didn't take me long to find that you are correct and my theory has major flaws in it. Basicall it is ignorance of global chemistry. So much for me saving the world. Thanks RAD
 
  • #5
http://www.nerc.ac.uk/about/consult/debate/debate.aspx?did=1&pg=1&f= [Broken]

A certainly far from complete overview here.

It's way beyond me, why people need to engage in a cumulative positive feedback loop of scaremongering and desire of to be feared. A new pinnacle of that process here:

http://www.care2.com/news/member/366440609/266503

Getting tired of this ghost hunt of hot air.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #6
Below a quote from a Physics Text book, claiming that human caused carbon-dioxide levels are proven

It is known that the concentration of CO2 in the atmosphere between 1800 and 2005 has increased from 280 to 380 parts per million. It is known without doubt that this increase is due to human burning of fossil fuels, and not to natural sources such as the oceans or volcanoes. Here are three arguments. First of all, there was a parallel decline of the 14C/12C ratio. Second, there was a parallel decline of the 13C/12C ratio. Finally, there was a parallel decline of the oxygen concentration. All three measurements independently imply that the CO2 increase is due to the burning of fuels, which are low in 14C and in 13C, and at the same time decrease the oxygen ratio.
Natural sources do not have these three effects. Since CO2 is a major greenhouse gas, the data implies that humans are also responsible for a large part of the temperature increase during the same period.

From: http://www.motionmountain.net/index.html
Motion Mountain
The adventures of physics.
p.867-868
 

1. What is the main cause of global warming?

The main cause of global warming is the increase in greenhouse gases, specifically carbon dioxide, in the Earth's atmosphere. These gases trap heat from the sun, causing the Earth's temperature to rise.

2. Is global warming a natural or man-made phenomenon?

While the Earth's climate has naturally fluctuated throughout history, the current global warming trend is primarily caused by human activities such as burning fossil fuels, deforestation, and industrial processes.

3. How does global warming affect the environment?

Global warming has a variety of impacts on the environment, including rising sea levels, more frequent and severe natural disasters, changes in precipitation patterns, and loss of biodiversity. It can also have adverse effects on human health and agriculture.

4. What can be done to mitigate global warming?

To mitigate global warming, it is important to reduce greenhouse gas emissions by transitioning to renewable energy sources, promoting energy efficiency, and implementing sustainable land-use practices. Individuals can also make a difference by reducing their carbon footprint through actions such as driving less, using public transportation, and reducing meat consumption.

5. What are the potential long-term consequences of global warming?

If global warming continues at its current rate, it could have catastrophic consequences for the planet, including widespread flooding, food and water shortages, displacement of populations, and increased conflicts over resources. It is crucial to take action now to mitigate these potential consequences.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
7K
  • Sticky
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
1
Views
14K
Replies
10
Views
417
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • DIY Projects
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
13
Views
5K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
2
Views
4K
Replies
180
Views
31K
  • Earth Sciences
Replies
4
Views
6K
Back
Top