Example of Disentanglement?

  • Thread starter LarryS
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Example
In summary: Doesn't "disentanglement" imply decoherence? Entanglement requires maintaining coherence between the entangled entities. That's why photons are often used. They can maintain coherence over longer distances and time when compared to charged particles such as electrons.
  • #1
LarryS
Gold Member
345
33
Given, say, two electrons whose spins are entangled in the singlet state. Over time, the two electrons have become somewhat spatially separated.

What would be an example of a physical experiment that disentangles the spins of two electrons?

As always, thanks in advance.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
referframe said:
Given, say, two electrons whose spins are entangled in the singlet state. Over time, the two electrons have become somewhat spatially separated.

What would be an example of a physical experiment that disentangles the spins of two electrons?

As always, thanks in advance.

Maybe I misread this, but it isn't obvious that a simple scattering off one of the electrons would do this?

Zz.
 
  • #3
ZapperZ said:
Maybe I misread this, but it isn't obvious that a simple scattering off one of the electrons would do this?

Zz.

OK, but how does that work (mathematically) if the 2 spin-entangled electrons are now 100 miles apart?
 
  • #4
referframe said:
OK, but how does that work (mathematically) if the 2 spin-entangled electrons are now 100 miles apart?

There is collapse, and of course distance is not a factor. It goes from being 2 particles making up a system in a shared state, to 2 particles now described by individual separable states.

Or are you asking the physical basis of that operation? (which no one knows...)
 
  • #5
referframe said:
OK, but how does that work (mathematically) if the 2 spin-entangled electrons are now 100 miles apart?

It seems Heisenberg is more important than Newton in Nature's plans.
 
  • #6
referframe said:
OK, but how does that work (mathematically) if the 2 spin-entangled electrons are now 100 miles apart?

We now have two separate (individual) wave-functions instead of one single wave function (earlier) to describe the particles.
 
  • #7
referframe said:
OK, but how does that work (mathematically) if the 2 spin-entangled electrons are now 100 miles apart?

Do you know what to do if they are only 1 micron apart?

There's something I am not understanding with this whole thread. Why do you require a distance? Why electrons in particular? Why are you not getting that the very act of measurement itself destroys the entanglement? There are things here that made the original question rather baffling.

Zz.
 
  • #8
referframe said:
What would be an example of a physical experiment that disentangles the spins of two electrons?
As you probably know, a simple spin measurement "disentangles" them.

I guess you are looking for a continuous process of "disentangeling" which doesn't involve the measurement problem. I think one example would be the experimental realization of the Jaynes-Cummings model of quantum optics. Here, you have a particle and a mode of the electrical field which get entangled and disentangled periodically.

ZapperZ said:
Maybe I misread this, but it isn't obvious that a simple scattering off one of the electrons would do this?
It isn't obvious to me, why a state |Bell state of an EPR pair> × |state of a scattering partner> should generally evolve such that the EPR pair is described by a product state afterwards.
 
  • #9
kith said:
It isn't obvious to me, why a state |Bell state of an EPR pair> × |state of a scattering partner> should generally evolve such that the EPR pair is described by a product state afterwards.

Er... there's nothing that says that it HAS to be a "product state afterwards", at least in experiments.

I can show you an experiment in which just ONE single scattering event is sufficient induce decoherence:

https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1498616&postcount=55

Zz.
 
  • #10
ZapperZ said:
Er... there's nothing that says that it HAS to be a "product state afterwards", at least in experiments.
Ok, but somehow the degree of entanglement has to be reduced. Being not very familiar with scattering, this is still not obvious to me.

ZapperZ said:
I can show you an experiment in which just ONE single scattering event is sufficient induce decoherence.
This is interesting, thanks for the link! But having read only the abstract, I don't see how it applies to this thread. If I get it right, they start with an electron in superposition and let it interact with an additional electron. This leads to momentum entanglement between the two electrons and the disappearance of the interference fringes of the first electron, i.e. decoherence occurs. How does this relate to the topic which is disentanglement of two electrons?
 
  • #11
kith said:
Ok, but somehow the degree of entanglement has to be reduced. Being not very familiar with scattering, this is still not obvious to me.This is interesting, thanks for the link! But having read only the abstract, I don't see how it applies to this thread. If I get it right, they start with an electron in superposition and let it interact with an additional electron. This leads to momentum entanglement between the two electrons and the disappearance of the interference fringes of the first electron, i.e. decoherence occurs. How does this relate to the topic which is disentanglement of two electrons?

Doesn't "disentanglement" imply decoherence? Entanglement requires maintaining coherence between the entangled entities. That's why photons are often used. They can maintain coherence over longer distances and time when compared to charged particles such as electrons.

Sure, there are varying degree of decoherence, but that experiment clearly shows that you only need an interaction with just ONE other particle for the original coherent state to be destroyed.

Zz.
 
  • #12
ZapperZ said:
Doesn't "disentanglement" imply decoherence?
No, you can also have a unitary time evolution from an entangled state to a product state. I think this is what happens in the Jaynes-Cummings model which I mentioned in my first post (and which has been realized experimentally in 1987 according to wikipedia). There, the entanglement is between a field mode and a particle.

I don't know if something similar has been done with two entangled particles. It's not hard to write down a proper quantum circuit but it may be very hard to realize it experimentally.
 
  • #13
kith said:
No, you can also have a unitary time evolution from an entangled state to a product state (or a state with a smaller degree of entanglement). I think this is what happens in the Jaynes-Cummings model which I mentioned in my first post (and which has been realized experimentally in 1987 according to wikipedia). There, the entanglement is between a field mode and a particle.

I don't know if something similar has been done with two entangled particles. It's not hard to design a proper quantum circuit but it may be very hard to realize it experimentally.

.. and you think that this is what is meant by the OP when he mentioned "disentangles"?

Zz.
 
  • #14
ZapperZ said:
.. and you think that this is what is meant by the OP when he mentioned "disentangles"?
How should he know in advance? He doesn't know how to disentangle a system, so I told him about a second possibility besides the one which had already been mentioned. I'm a big fan of answering the actual question instead of offering a standard answer.

The problem with this thread is that the OP remains very vague so probably he won't benefit much from it.
 
  • #15
Thank you all for your input. I watched the entire 20-hour Leonard Susskind YouTube lectures on Quantum Entanglement and somehow he never directly associated measuring one of the spins as "disentanglement". In one lecture, he describes (non-mathematically) a situation in which particle A is entangled with particle B and then the experimenter throws particle B into a tub of water. He states that then particle A would be entangled with all the atoms in the tub of water and ONLY WHEN particle B is brought back close to particle A to interact with it does disentanglement occur.
 

1. What is an example of disentanglement?

An example of disentanglement is the process of untangling two or more objects or ideas that are intertwined or interdependent. This can refer to physical objects, such as untangling a knot in a rope, or more abstract concepts, such as separating two conflicting ideas or beliefs.

2. Why is disentanglement important in scientific research?

Disentanglement is crucial in scientific research because it allows for a clearer understanding and analysis of complex systems. By separating different variables or factors, researchers can better isolate and study the effects of each component, leading to more accurate conclusions and findings.

3. How is disentanglement used in data analysis?

In data analysis, disentanglement refers to the process of separating and identifying different patterns or information within a dataset. This can involve techniques such as principal component analysis or factor analysis, which help to reduce the complexity of the data and identify underlying factors or variables.

4. Can disentanglement be applied to social or cultural issues?

Yes, disentanglement can also be applied to social and cultural issues. For example, in addressing complex societal problems, disentanglement can involve separating and analyzing different factors such as economic, political, and cultural influences. This can help to identify the root causes of an issue and develop more effective solutions.

5. Are there any limitations to disentanglement?

While disentanglement is a valuable tool in scientific research, it also has its limitations. It may not always be possible to completely separate or isolate different components, especially in complex systems where there are many interdependencies. Additionally, disentanglement can sometimes oversimplify or overlook important interactions and relationships between variables.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
7
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
828
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
3
Views
2K
Replies
43
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
714
Replies
3
Views
676
Replies
10
Views
941
  • Quantum Physics
4
Replies
124
Views
3K
Replies
12
Views
834
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
12
Views
1K
Back
Top