String theory verses Special Relativity

In summary, the conversation discusses the implications of string theory on Einstein's theory of relativity, specifically in regards to the relationship between energy and mass. The conclusion is that while string theory is based on relativity, it does not contradict it and both theories should be compatible.
  • #1
Dlockwood
34
0
Do any of the string theorists realize that if their theories are correct Einstein's theory has to be wrong? The minute you conclude that the smallest particles are "strings of light" you have to also conclude that everything tangible is energy 'en masse', therefore matter has to be energy below the velocity of light. That also means that as a mass approaches the velocity of light it becomes energy, not infinite mass. I would appreciate comments and views.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Mon Dieu! Je téléphonerai à Ed Witten tout de suite!
 
  • #3
The relationship between energy and mass is part of the theory of relativity.

[/quote]That also means that as a mass approaches the velocity of light it becomes energy, not infinite mass. [/quote]

Could you explain what you mean. Things with mass never achieve the speed of light, and the mass is always finite.
 
  • #4
String theory is, by conception, based on relativity. Don't worry, they still know that they are trying to use it, and that both theories should be compatible.
 

1. What is the difference between string theory and special relativity?

String theory is a theoretical framework that attempts to unify all the forces of nature, including gravity, by postulating that everything in the universe is made up of tiny strings. On the other hand, special relativity is a well-established theory that describes the relationship between space and time in the absence of gravity.

2. Which theory is more widely accepted by the scientific community?

Special relativity is currently the more widely accepted theory by the scientific community due to its extensive experimental evidence and successful predictions. However, string theory is still being actively researched and may one day be accepted as a valid theory.

3. Can string theory and special relativity be reconciled?

There have been attempts to reconcile string theory and special relativity, but so far, there is no definitive answer. Some theories, such as M-theory, incorporate elements of both string theory and special relativity.

4. How does string theory explain the existence of multiple dimensions?

String theory predicts the existence of multiple dimensions by postulating that the fundamental building blocks of the universe, the strings, vibrate in these extra dimensions. This allows for the possibility of more than the four dimensions we experience in our daily lives.

5. What are the potential implications of string theory and special relativity?

If string theory is proven to be correct, it would provide a unified framework for understanding all the forces of nature, including gravity, and could potentially lead to new technologies and advancements. Special relativity has already had significant implications in areas such as GPS technology and our understanding of the universe.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
19
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
61
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
8
Views
174
  • Special and General Relativity
3
Replies
75
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
57
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
23
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
18
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
791
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
82
Views
6K
Back
Top