Dividing by Zero: Is it Undefined or Infinity?

  • Thread starter scribe
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Zero
In summary: Overall, the concept of dividing by zero is undefined and does not make mathematical sense. It does not follow the rules of arithmetic and creates contradictions and inconsistencies in mathematical equations. Ultimately, it is considered off-limits in mathematics due to its nonsensical nature. In summary, the discussion revolves around the concept of dividing by zero, with one side arguing that it is undefined and the other side claiming it is equal to infinity. However, delving deeper into the concept reveals that it does not fit within the rules of arithmetic and is considered off-limits in mathematics.
  • #1
scribe
2
0
I'm not sure where this would go specifically, mods move it to where you feel it needs to be if necessary.

I'm in a discussion with 2 guys about dividing by zero. I say its undefined and give the standard reasons why. They say it is. I'm pasting parts of the convo here and would like your input.

Me:
"All equations must be subject to reversiblity in some way. I know that isn't the official term.

8/4 = 2
can be re-expressed
2*4 = 8

8/0 = 0
cannot be re-expressed as
0 * 0 = 8"

Dude #1
"Actually, it does work:

8/0 = infinity -> 0 * (8/0) = infinity * 0 -> ( 0*8 )/0 = infinity * 0 -> 0/0 = 0 * infinity."


Me
"I disagree. And I'm not the only one.

http://www.math.utah.edu/~alfeld/math/0by0.html
http://mathforum.org/dr.math/faq/faq.divideby0.html

Here's a specific quote from the math forum website.

"But maybe you're thinking of saying that 1/0 = infinity. Well then, what's "infinity"? How does it work in all the other equations?

Does infinity - infinity = 0?
Does 1 + infinity = infinity?

If so, the associative rule doesn't work, since (a+b)+c = a+(b+c) will not always work:

1 + (infinity - infinity) = 1 + 0 = 1, but
(1 + infinity) - infinity = infinity - infinity = 0.

You can try to make up a good set of rules, but it always leads to nonsense, so to avoid all the trouble we just say that it doesn't make sense to divide by zero."

Perhaps elaborate on you reasons why?


Dude #2

"Mathmaticians are lazy," that is a direct quote from my Calculus professer.

Humans are imperfect, with imperfect minds, therefore we do not understand all levels of the true complexity of pure mathmatics, therefore the lazy mathmaticians who are dealing with these equations, unable to grasp infinity declare it "off limits" . (Math joke)

However in calculus if you do not know what a function is equal to at some number, you use the values you do know on either side and try to work close to the value you do not know, this is called taking the limit, if the equation seems to approach the same value when coming from either direction this value is the limit at this number. When taking the limt of 1/0 you find the function going to infinity from both directions, therefore the limit of 1/0 is infinty, the same as the limit of 4/2 is 2.

Now do you see why your calculator might display ERROR when you try this home,

you have the wrong calculator.


Dude#1
Discrete Mathematics and Calculus are two separate branches of mathematics.

Discrete Mathematics, on which all computing machines, from pocket calculators to supercomputers are based, indeed does not allow for infinity at all.

Calculus, on the other hand, which has been essential to physics since Newton, deals infinities all the time and in that field 1/0 = infinity, and reciprocally, 1/infinity = 0.

Calculus does not provide for adding and subtracting infinities, only multiplying and dividing them, but in Quantum Physics, infinity - infinity does equal 0. This does violate the asociative property, but Quantum Physics is so strange anyway that it doesn't really matter.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
in discreet mathematics such as calculus, factorials in a way support dividing by zero, although its just a part of the "factorial" law.

For instance 5!/0!

many would say indeterminate, as 5x4x3x2x1 over 0x0 is indeterminate.

However, zero factorial is defined as 1.

ahhhhh :-)
 
Last edited:
  • #3
indeterminate. instead of undefined.

1/0 = positive infinity? negative infinity? zero? one ?

besides, its pointless. meaningless! and there is no room for meaningless mathematics!
 
  • #4
scribe said:
Me:
"All equations must be subject to reversiblity in some way. I know that isn't the official term.

8/4 = 2
can be re-expressed
2*4 = 8

8/0 = 0
cannot be re-expressed as
0 * 0 = 8"

You managed to put your finger on the sore spot.
It becomes evident when we ask the question: "What does division mean?"
It's the inverse operation of multiplication.

The expression [itex]\frac{a}{b}[/itex] denotes a number. Which number?
It's the number which, when multiplied by b, gives a.

Now consider [itex]\frac{a}{0}[/itex]. What number would this be? It should be the number which, when multiplied by 0, gives a. However, any number multiplied by zero yields zero.
So you cannot assign a number to [itex]\frac{a}{0}[/itex] in any rational (excuse the pun) way.
 
  • #5
It's undefined simply because that's part of the definition of division for real numbers. You should probably state this clearly once or twice, but usually all you can really do with these people is give clear reasons why it's not useful to make a definition for it.


Dude#2 is almost semi-correct, but I don't know if he knows why. There are two topological spaces that are often useful to use called the projective real line and the extended real line. The former admits a single point "at infinity", and the latter two.

In the projective line, it is correct to say that 1/0 = infinity... but the important thing to know is that this instance of / is a different function than / for real division. (though, both functions agree when the arguments are both real) Of course, 0/0 is still undefined.

In the extended real line, it is even incorrect to say that 1/0 = infinity. It is even incorrect to say that [itex]\lim_{x \rightarrow 0} 1/x = \infin[/itex] -- don't forget that when x goes to 0, x takes on both positive and negative numbers.

But, in any case, neither of these are the real numbers. These systems weren't built for doing arithmetic, they were built for doing calculus and other geometric things. They are not the relevant systems when speaking about arithmetic questions!
 
  • #6
Galileo said:
So you cannot assign a number to [itex]\frac{a}{0}[/itex] in any rational (excuse the pun) way.

Except when a=0. Which is why the "inverse operation of multiplication" explanation doesn't exactly work for me.

Zero times zero equals zero, but zero divided by zero does not equal zero.
 
  • #7
t!m said:
Except when a=0. Which is why the "inverse operation of multiplication" explanation doesn't exactly work for me.

Zero times zero equals zero, but zero divided by zero does not equal zero.
If a is zero, you have, likewise, a problem. Since 0/0 would then be the number which, when multiplied by 0 would be 0. Since any number fullfils that criterium, the explanation does not assign a number to 0/0 in any unique way.
 

1. What does it mean to divide by zero?

Dividing by zero means attempting to divide a number by zero, which is mathematically undefined. It is equivalent to asking how many times zero can fit into a number.

2. Is dividing by zero undefined or infinity?

Dividing by zero is considered undefined in mathematics. This means that it does not have a specific value and cannot be solved. However, in some situations, it may result in an infinite value.

3. Why is dividing by zero considered undefined?

Dividing by zero is considered undefined because it violates the basic principles of mathematics. In division, the divisor cannot be equal to zero, as it would lead to an infinite number of solutions.

4. Can dividing by zero ever result in a finite value?

No, dividing by zero can never result in a finite value. It will either be undefined or infinite, depending on the specific situation.

5. Are there any real-world applications where dividing by zero is used?

No, dividing by zero is not used in any real-world applications. It is considered an error and is not a valid mathematical operation.

Similar threads

  • General Math
2
Replies
40
Views
3K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
767
  • General Math
Replies
15
Views
3K
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Programming and Computer Science
Replies
32
Views
3K
  • General Math
2
Replies
47
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
526
  • General Math
2
Replies
36
Views
3K
  • Calculus
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Back
Top