- #36
leroyjenkens
- 616
- 49
Depends on the class. Personally, I needed little calculus in quite a few of my physics classes. It seemed like a lot of the time we were just finding ways to avoid having to do calculus.So you think calculus is not required for an undergrad physics degree because there are elementary cases enough to consider? Is this correct?
I'm not suggesting anything like that for someone who's studying for a degree in physics, or even just someone taking a single physics class as an elective. Getting a degree in physics is a far cry from someone who just wants to learn various physics principles, which is what I'm arguing either doesn't require math, or requires very little. Of course, you could learn the math and get a deeper understanding, but remember, my original point was that you're not excluded from learning physics without math. Everyone seemed to disagree, but no one seemed to want to provide counter-arguments to my arguments.Also, I would love to see you handle elementary things like "motion with constant acceleration" without calculus. How will you handle it? Just give out the formulas and let them memorize it. I know that happens in algebra-based physics, but it's horrible.
Basically all you are suggesting is that you give out some formulas with essentially no justification and let them memorize it.
It is when you consider all the people who are actually interested in physics to some degree (everyone that I know), in comparison to the people who know calculus (definitely not everyone I know).I wouldn't call calculus esoteric.