- #1
jdhenckel
- 3
- 0
On 8/16/09 a alxm wrote...
Another way to say it is: The location of a macroscopic object is only a little bit random, and the probability of tunneling is very very small.
Is that correct?
For example, the probability of a baseball tunneling to a location 1 meter away is not exactly zero, but it is very close to zero.
Is that correct?
Thanks, John
Macroscopic objects have a quite definite location, and do not tunnel to any appreciable extent.
Another way to say it is: The location of a macroscopic object is only a little bit random, and the probability of tunneling is very very small.
Is that correct?
For example, the probability of a baseball tunneling to a location 1 meter away is not exactly zero, but it is very close to zero.
Is that correct?
Thanks, John