Beam welded to plate. Plate stress?

In summary: Check out Timoshenko's Theory of Plates and Shells. I don't think you'll find this to be as difficult as you think it is.Checking out Timoshenko's Theory of Plates and Shells...In summary, the designer is concerned about the stress in the plate and the deflection in the beam. They have access to a Solidworks simulation, but want to know if anyone knows of an analytical solution or experimental solution.
  • #1
Engineer_Phil
27
0
I have a design where a beam gets welded to a plate. The plate is not against a wall or foundation, but for simplicity I can say that the edges of the plate are fixed. I am concerned about the stress in the plate, and the deflection in the beam. I have access to solidworks simulation, but I want to know if anyone knows of an analytical solution or experimental solution that I can compare to. I don't like to just blindly trust a simulation.
I have attached an image of my setup. In the future I want to vary the beam cross section size and style.
 

Attachments

  • Capture.JPG
    Capture.JPG
    19.5 KB · Views: 807
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #2
The process and quality of the weld is critical - welding is MUCH more organic than people recognize.
 
  • #3
We have qualified welding procedures and a good quality control program the welding should be fine. I am more concerned about how to determine the required thickness of the plate. The stress cannot exceed 20 kpsi.
 
  • #4
Do you mean the stress caused by the welding - or how much stress the weldament can withstand once complete?
For stress caused by the weld - there are different ways to make the weld, different processes and different electrode types. The determination of the HAZ will have a large impact in both the stress created by the process and how much the weld can take.
Probably the best is to get the datasheet for the electrodes your best welder would like to use.
I do think Solidworks has a simulator for welds - but you will need to know the parameters of the weld process and electrodes details.
 
  • #5
An elastic analysis will tell you how the stress changes due to the applied load, but not take account of the residual stresses from welding, and takes no account of stress redistribution after the first yield of the steel. Plastic theory or yield line theory will give a good indication of the collapse load, but give no information on the working load behaviour.
 
  • #6
If I was doing this, I'd trust the simulation more than any theoretical hand calculations. I've done something similar to this for work, but with something bolted to a corrugated steel sheet. To simplify the simlation, you can use simple statics to calculate the forces at the wall. Then just model only the plate in the simulation. What you're after is the stress on the plate around the beam and plate contact. An easy way to do this is make the contact surface a different element than the rest of the plate and turn it off when analysisng the results. This just gives you the stress on the plate.

In other words, simulation is the best way.
 
  • #7
Thanks for the help guys.

I guess I have no choice but to accept the Simulation results as Vadar2012 suggests.
I am going to look at getting some strain gauges to verify the Simulation results.

I hope the simulation is wrong though... otherwise the plate is going to have to be very very thick.
 
  • #8
Yeah, I found it was larger than I thought. Will be interesting to hear about the strain gauge results.
 
  • #9
Vadar2012 said:
Yeah, I found it was larger than I thought. Will be interesting to hear about the strain gauge results.

Did you run an FEA? I'd like to compare results if you did.
 
  • #10
Engineer_Phil said:
Did you run an FEA? I'd like to compare results if you did.

Can't run one on yours, don't have any info.
 
  • #11
I made a simple drawing to give you the data.

A picture is worth a thousand words.

attachment.php?attachmentid=54972&stc=1&d=1359045340.jpg
 

Attachments

  • problem data.JPG
    problem data.JPG
    28.9 KB · Views: 1,232
  • #12
Just out of interest: How would you use strain gauges with this. Do you glue them on beforehand and then measure the resistance before and after? Do they survive welding temperatures?
 
  • #13
What is the plate attached to? AISC give some guidance on welding plates to walls of HSS (hollow structural steel). Also Blodget's Design of Welded Structures also covers this.
 
  • #14
0xDEADBEEF said:
Just out of interest: How would you use strain gauges with this. Do you glue them on beforehand and then measure the resistance before and after? Do they survive welding temperatures?

I am not really concerned with residual stresses from welding at this point. I would weld the beam to the plate, then put the strain gauge on the back side of the plate directly behind the bottom of the beam. Then load the beam. And take the strain gauge measurement.
 
  • #15
Engineer_Phil said:
Thanks for the help guys.

I guess I have no choice but to accept the Simulation results...

Accepting a simulations answer (especially Solidworks) without an approximate paper answer to corroborate it is never the way to do something correctly.

Check out Timoshenko's Theory of Plates and Shells. I don't think you'll find this to be as difficult as you think it is.
 
  • #16
I would think that Roarke's "Stress and Strain" would give a solution, but i don't have a copy right now. But being very conservative by assuming simple supports along the short edges and free along the long side, I get a 5/8" thick plate required using a hand calc on the back of a matchbook. Looks like a 1/2 inch plate will do, as you have drawn. But someone needs to quality review my work
M_max in beam at beam/plate interface = 3(12) = 36 in-k
Load to short edge = M/L = 36/18 = 2 kips
M_max in plate at plate/beam interface = 2(6) = 12 in-k
S_req'd = M/allowable stress = 12/20 = 0.6 in^3
t_required = sq rt( 6S/b) = sq rt(6(.6)/10) = 0.6 in

Is a 5/8" plate too thick for you? i wouldn't cut it back too much...why fool with it.
 
  • #17
PhanthomJay: Roark does not seem to contain the given problem. Nice approach. Using your approach, I get the same answer you got, except a different allowable stress (and therefore a different wall plate thickness). I currently do not know how you got your allowable stress. My allowable bending stress is currently, Sta = 197 MPa. Therefore, I currently obtain the following wall plate thickness (t1), using your above approach.

t1 = sqrt[3(1 - h2/h1)*L*V/(b1*Sta)] = 12.75 mm,​

where b1 = wall plate width, h1 = wall plate height, h2 = cantilever beam plate height, L = cantilever beam length, and V = cantilever transverse tip load.
 
Last edited:
  • #18
nvn said:
PhanthomJay: Roark does not seem to contain the given problem. Nice approach. Using your approach, I get the same answer you got, except a different allowable stress (and therefore a different wall plate thickness). I currently do not know how you got your allowable stress. My allowable bending stress is currently, Sta = 197 MPa. Therefore, I currently obtain the following wall plate thickness (t1), using your above approach.

t1 = sqrt[3(1 - h2/h1)*L*V/(b1*Sta)] = 12.75 mm,​

where b1 = wall plate width, h1 = wall plate height, h2 = cantilever beam plate height, L = cantilever beam length, and V = cantilever transverse tip load.

Thanks for the check..the alowable stress of 20,000 pounds per square inch (138 MPa) was later introduced by the OP in post 3.
 
  • #19
0xDEADBEEF said:
Just out of interest: How would you use strain gauges with this. Do you glue them on beforehand and then measure the resistance before and after? Do they survive welding temperatures?

Wouldn't you place the strain gauges on the plate next to the beam. Not directly behind the beam attachment face. That attachment face isn't bending.

It'll be interesting to see how the FEA compares to the hand calc. Please let us know.
 
  • #20
Engineer_Phil: I found that the following formula currently appears to give a relatively accurate answer to your given problem in post 11, and is more accurate than the equation in post 17.

t1 = sqrt[2.522(1 - h2/h1)*L*V/(b1*Sta)]​

Therefore, if Sta = 197 MPa, then the above equation gives t1 = 11.69 mm. Or if Sta = 138 MPa, the above equation gives t1 = 13.97 mm. Alternately, solving the above equation for stress gives the following wall plate maximum normal stress, sigma1, for your given problem in post 11.

sigma1 = C*(1 - h2/h1)*L*V/(b1*t1^2),​

where C = coefficient = 2.522, currently. E.g., if t1 = 12.7 mm, then the above equation gives a wall plate maximum tensile stress of sigma1 = 166.9 MPa. Ensure sigma1 does not exceed the wall plate allowable tensile stress, Sta.

If your current FEA wall plate in-plane normal stress is vastly different from sigma1 above, it might indicate a mistake in your FEM.
 
Last edited:
  • #21
Engineer_Phil: OK, I see what you mean, regarding this baffling problem. For your given problem in post 11, if you compute the wall plate stress using analytic methods, you get a wall plate stress of, say, 170 +/-20 MPa. But if you then use FEA, you get a wall plate stress of approximately 260 +/-20 MPa, even if you make an effort to ignore FEA stress concentrations. The two answers are not even close, yet. I have not figured out this discrepancy yet. This is something a person needs to try themselves, to see this odd discrepancy. Interesting question you came up with.
 
  • #22
Engineer_Phil: For your given problem in post 11, I assumed a 6.0 mm fillet radius between the cantilever plate and the wall plate, and an integral connection between the cantilever plate and wall plate (for simplicity), because you have not given us any details regarding how you modeled it. I now obtained more accurate stress results, as follows.

sigma1 = C*(1 - h2/h1)*L*V/(b1*t1^2)​

(1) For the maximum von Mises stress on the back of the wall plate, C is currently C = 3.29. I.e., sigma1 = 218 MPa, which does not exceed the wall plate tensile yield strength, Sty = 262 MPa. (Therefore, we see that the approach by PhanthomJay is off by only -8.8 % for stress on the back of the wall plate.)

(2) For the maximum von Mises stress on the front of the wall plate, just above the edge of the cantilever plate upper fillet, C is currently C = 4.56. I.e., sigma1 = 302 MPa, which exceeds the wall plate tensile yield strength, Sty.

(3) The maximum von Mises stress in the middle of the fillet (not on the wall plate), at the upper left or right corner where the cantilever plate connects to the wall plate (where two fillets intersect, forming a curved, concave, sharp edge), there is a tiny spot where C reaches C = 8.67. I.e., sigma1 = 574 MPa. This tiny spot will reach the tensile yield strength, then redistribute; therefore, it is probably negligible, for static (noncyclic) loading.

(4) The deflection of your cantilever tip is y = 1.12 mm, downward.

(5) Here are the detailed stresses corresponding to items 1 and 2. For the in-plane, x- and y-direction normal stress on the back of the wall plate, C = -2.84 in the x direction, and C = -3.61 in the y direction. I.e., sigma_x = -188 MPa, and sigma_y = -239 MPa. (The y direction is vertical.)

(6) For the in-plane, x- and y-direction normal stress on the front of the wall plate, C = 3.54 in the x direction, and C = 5.15 in the y direction. I.e., sigma_x = 234 MPa, and sigma_y = 341 MPa.

The above stress results indicate that your wall plate is currently overstressed, and that you need to add stiffeners. Let us know if you want ideas regarding different methods of adding stiffeners, and then someone might be able to show you. Another benefit of adding stiffeners is, it might make the connection easier to analyze using FEA. Your current design is very difficult to analyze using FEA, and is virtually nonexistent in textbooks.
 
Last edited:

1. What is beam welding and how does it work?

Beam welding is a type of welding process where a concentrated beam of heat is used to melt the edges of two pieces of metal. The molten metal then fuses together, creating a strong bond. This is typically done using a high-powered laser or electron beam.

2. What is a plate stress and how does it affect beam welding?

A plate stress is the amount of force or pressure exerted on a metal plate, which can cause it to deform or bend. In beam welding, plate stress is important to consider as it can affect the quality and integrity of the weld. Excessive plate stress can lead to distortion, warping, or cracking of the welded joint.

3. How do you determine the appropriate plate stress for beam welding?

The appropriate plate stress for beam welding depends on factors such as the type and thickness of the metal being welded, the welding method used, and the welding conditions. It is important to consult with welding codes and standards, as well as perform tests and simulations, to determine the appropriate plate stress for a specific welding project.

4. What are some common methods for reducing plate stress in beam welding?

There are several methods for reducing plate stress in beam welding, including preheating the metal before welding, using a lower welding speed, and using a multi-pass welding technique. Additionally, using fixtures or clamps to hold the metal plates in place during welding can also help reduce plate stress.

5. How can plate stress impact the strength and durability of a welded joint?

If the plate stress is too high during beam welding, it can lead to defects and weaknesses in the welded joint. This can compromise the strength and durability of the joint, making it more susceptible to failure. It is important to carefully control and monitor plate stress during beam welding to ensure a strong and durable welded joint.

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
1
Views
853
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
16
Views
1K
Replies
8
Views
4K
Replies
31
Views
49K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • General Engineering
Replies
2
Views
3K
  • General Engineering
Replies
7
Views
2K
Replies
33
Views
3K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
255
Back
Top