Hamiltonian of a spin 1/2 particle in a constant mag. field

In summary, the kinetic energy term is absent from the hamiltonian for a magnetic dipole, but it is present if you are dealing with a free particle in a magnetic field.
  • #1
quasar987
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
Gold Member
4,807
32
Why is there no kinetic energy term in said hamiltonian? Suppose I take a magnetic dipole in my hand, and I throw it in the field. Then surely its classical energy is E = p²/2m - [itex]\vec{\mu} \cdot \vec{B}[/itex].

Then why is the p²/2m term absent in the hamiltonian?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
There is a kinetic energy term if you are dealing with a free particle in a magnetic field, but that problem is slightly more complicated. The Hamiltonian is given by
[tex] \mathcal{H} = (\hat{\mathbf{p}}/ 2m - e/c \mathbf{A})^2 + \mathbf{\mu}\cdot \mathbf{B}[/tex]
and so you have to solve this problem, which is a little more involved. If you're only interested in spin dynamics (for example if you're interested in dealing with a localized spin on a crystal lattice) then you don't worry about the kinetic energy term. Also, the kinetic energy term is in a different Hilbert space, so you can solve the two problems separately and combine them, if you really wanted to.
 
  • #3
abszero said:
If you're only interested in spin dynamics (for example if you're interested in dealing with a localized spin on a crystal lattice) then you don't worry about the kinetic energy term. Also, the kinetic energy term is in a different Hilbert space, so you can solve the two problems separately and combine them, if you really wanted to.

You mean you can solve the Schrödinger equation for each term separately and then combine the results? I certainly didn’t know that! What are the rules for combining these results?
 
  • #4
You end up with a direct product space where one part is a contribution due to the spin-coupling component of the hamiltonian, and the other is due to the kinetic energy term. So you end up with direct product eigenspaces that look like
[tex] \mathcal{H} |E_{KE} ; E_{\sigma} \rangle = (E_{KE} + E_{\sigma}) |E_{KE} ; E_{\sigma} \rangle [/tex]
So it is in a way like breaking up a classical hamiltonian for multiple particles, where some of the degrees of freedom are not coupled. You can break the system up into parts and solve the individual parts, then put them back together.
 

1. What is a spin 1/2 particle?

A spin 1/2 particle is a fundamental particle that has an intrinsic spin angular momentum of 1/2, which is a quantum mechanical property. Examples of spin 1/2 particles include electrons, protons, and neutrons.

2. What is a Hamiltonian?

A Hamiltonian is a mathematical operator that represents the total energy of a system in quantum mechanics. It takes into account the kinetic and potential energies of the particles in the system.

3. What is a constant magnetic field?

A constant magnetic field is a uniform magnetic field that has the same strength and direction at all points in space. This can be created by a permanent magnet or by a steady flow of electric current.

4. How does a spin 1/2 particle behave in a constant magnetic field?

A spin 1/2 particle behaves like a tiny magnet in a constant magnetic field. The direction of its spin can either align or oppose the direction of the magnetic field, which affects its energy and behavior.

5. What is the significance of the Hamiltonian of a spin 1/2 particle in a constant magnetic field?

The Hamiltonian of a spin 1/2 particle in a constant magnetic field is important in understanding the behavior and energy levels of these particles in magnetic fields. It is also used in many applications, such as in nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) imaging and quantum computing.

Similar threads

  • Quantum Physics
Replies
10
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
5
Views
534
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
1
Views
723
Replies
9
Views
479
Replies
2
Views
97
Replies
26
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
881
Replies
1
Views
616
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
664
Back
Top