Why does bringing N 1-orbital atoms together yield N levels?

In summary, when you bring a lot of atoms together, the electron-electron interactions mean that there is no longer a well-defined 1s state. The new system has different energy levels.
  • #1
geologic
7
0
A common example of this is that when bringing N hydrogen atoms together into a ring. Far apart, assume each electron exists in the 1s state. As we bring them together, instead of each electron staying at the original 1s level, or all of them changing by the same amount, the 1s level fans out into N.

For the case of 2 atoms, I can understand this as bonding or anti-bonding of the atoms. i.e., do the wavefunctions add between the protons, meaning each electron can share in the potential of both protons (bonding) or do the wavefunctions destructively interfere between the protons (anti-bonding).

With 3 atoms, I can't find 3 levels. Assuming Gaussian shaped wavefunctions, note that the sign of each wavefunction between any two atoms defines the wavefunction on the rest of the ring. Since the signs of the wavefunction are independent, there should be 2^3=8 possibilities since each wavefunction can be + or -. Yet, there are really only 2 energetically distinct arrangements that I see: all have the same sign (two cases) or 2 of 3 have the same sign (2*(3 choose 2)), to account for both sign cases). So I get 3 atoms yield 2 levels.

Can somebody shed light on what I've done incorrectly? Or is 3 too small to work correctly? Is there an argument about the shape of the orbitals I've neglected?

Thank you.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hint: Pauli exclusion principle.
 
  • #3
geologic said:
Yet, there are really only 2 energetically distinct arrangements that I see: all have the same sign (two cases) or 2 of 3 have the same sign (2*(3 choose 2)), to account for both sign cases). So I get 3 atoms yield 2 levels.

You are right in that you only get two distinct energy levels. However there are two independent wavefunctions giving the same energy in case of the upper level.
In the case of a ring with N atoms, you get (N+1)/2 distinct energy levels.
 
  • #4
Simon Bridge said:
Hint: Pauli exclusion principle.

Yeah, I suppose I'm unclear about what defines a state in this context. If I assume all of the electrons remain in the 1s state, while sort of forming a metal, then I have more electrons than available states. So, the creation of more states solves this problem, but isn't obviously the answer.


DrDu said:
You are right in that you only get two distinct energy levels. However there are two independent wavefunctions giving the same energy in case of the upper level.
In the case of a ring with N atoms, you get (N+1)/2 distinct energy levels.

By the two independent wavefunctions in the upper (anti-bonding) level, do you mean the sign of them? Then this should yield 4 total levels since you could argue the same thing for the constructively interfering wavefunctions.

Also, the (N+1)/2 argument seems contrary to what I remember reading in Kittel: N atoms yield N levels. I assumed the levels were distinct.


Thanks for your replies, please follow up!
 
  • #5
Lets restrict talk to energy eigenstates of the system then.

When you bring a lot of atoms together, the electron-electron interactions mean that there is no longer a well-defined 1s state. The new system has different energy levels. The old 1s state is a superposition of the new system ... and the electrons decay into the new energy levels creating the new ground state.

You can model this by putting two finite square wells at different distances from each other and look what happens to the first few bound states when they are different distances apart. Also start with just one square well, with one particle, and "switch on" a second one.

Another way of thinking about it: no two electrons in the universe are ever in exactly the same discrete state - its just that the energy levels for far-separated wells are so very similar our instruments cannot tell the difference. When the wells get closer, their interactions force the states to split and you can see the difference.

Whatever - once the combined system has formed, the inital 1s states no longer exist and their energy levels may even be forbidden.

When lots of atoms are close together, like in a solid, the energy levels merge to form bands.

Note: I was wondering if DrDu was thinking of molecular energy or, maybe, configuration states.
 

1. Why do atoms have energy levels?

Atoms have energy levels because of the way electrons are arranged around the nucleus. Electrons can only exist in certain energy levels, and these levels are determined by the distance of the electron from the nucleus.

2. How does bringing N 1-orbital atoms together create N energy levels?

When two or more atoms come together, their orbitals overlap and form molecular orbitals. These molecular orbitals can accommodate the electrons from each atom, resulting in new energy levels that are a combination of the individual atom's energy levels.

3. Why are the energy levels of N 1-orbital atoms different from each other?

The energy levels of atoms are determined by the number of electrons they have and their distance from the nucleus. Each atom has a unique number of electrons and a different arrangement of those electrons, resulting in different energy levels.

4. How does the number of energy levels in an atom affect its properties?

The number of energy levels in an atom can affect its properties in several ways. For example, the number of valence electrons (electrons in the outermost energy level) can determine an atom's reactivity, while the energy difference between levels can determine an atom's ability to absorb or emit light.

5. Can atoms have more than one energy level at a time?

Yes, atoms can have multiple energy levels at once. In fact, most atoms have several energy levels occupied by electrons at any given time. The number of energy levels an atom can have is determined by its atomic number and the maximum number of electrons it can hold in each level.

Similar threads

  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
6
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
286
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
0
Views
392
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Atomic and Condensed Matter
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
2
Views
714
Back
Top