- #1
ComputerGeek
- 383
- 0
OK, I am reposting the poll with 3 new options.
Thanks for the constructive Criticism.
Thanks for the constructive Criticism.
SOS2008 said:As I said before, Bush should be thankful to Clinton. Because if Watergate was still the taste in our mouths rather than the Clinton fishing expeditions, there would be far less tolerance toward Bush now.
I'm not so sure: I think the Democrats are out for revenge and if they found anything they could hang their hat on, they'd push for impeachment in a second.SOS2008 said:As I said before, Bush should be thankful to Clinton. Because if Watergate was still the taste in our mouths rather than the Clinton fishing expeditions, there would be far less tolerance toward Bush now.
The majority consensus it that Bush has broken the law. It is the opposing party’s job to be the opposing party in a democracy (and they best be doing their job if they want to be reelected in 2006). Since all branches of government are Republican controlled, if they push for impeachment it's more like they could be hanging themselves out to dry.russ_watters said:I'm not so sure: I think the Democrats are out for revenge and if they found anything they could hang their hat on, they'd push for impeachment in a second.
The most dangerous action to American democracy is the suppression of voting rights. This includes any efforts to limit or hinder individuals' ability to vote, such as through voter ID laws, gerrymandering, or purging of voter rolls.
The suppression of voting rights can lead to unequal representation and a lack of diversity in elected officials. It also undermines the principle of "one person, one vote" and can lead to policies that do not reflect the will of the majority of citizens.
Voter suppression disproportionately affects marginalized communities, such as people of color, low-income individuals, and those with disabilities. These groups often face additional barriers to voting and are more likely to be impacted by voter suppression tactics.
There are a few ways to combat voter suppression, such as advocating for fair and transparent election processes, supporting organizations that fight for voting rights, and using your own voice to speak out against voter suppression tactics.
Scientists have a responsibility to use their knowledge and expertise to inform the public and policymakers about the impact of voter suppression on democracy. They can also conduct research on the effects of voter suppression and advocate for evidence-based policies that promote fair and equal access to the voting process.