Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates + Black Holes

In summary, when deriving the Eddington-Finkelstein Coordinates from the Schwarzschild metric, we assume that light rays travel on null-geodesics with ds2 = 0. This holds true in both flat and curved space-time, as it is a basic property of light to travel at the speed of light as measured by local rulers and clocks. The Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates use an ingoing null coordinate (v) and the radius (r) as a basis, with a null-coordinate and space-coordinate above the horizon and a null-coordinate and time-coordinate below the horizon. This allows for the evolution of a system using the null-coordinate (v) above the horizon, and the time-coordinate (
  • #1
discjockey
3
0
When deriving the Eddinton-Finkelstein Coordinates from the Schwarzschild metric, we start to examine light rays. However, in my relativity book, it states that ds^2=0: why do we assume that? :bugeye:
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Hi, and welcome to these Forums discjockey!

Not knowing exactly what text you are using makes a response a little risky, however the most obvious answer is that light rays travel on null-geodesics with ds2 = 0.

In flat space-time:
ds2 = dx2 + dy2 + dx2 - c2dt2.

As a light ray travels at the speed of light c then
dx2 + dy2 + dx2 = c2dt2.

Hence ds2 = 0.

The result also holds in curved space-time, it is a basic property of light to travel always at c as measured by local rulers and clocks.

Garth
 
Last edited:
  • #3
Thanks a lot!
 
  • #4
My question about Eddington-Finkelstein coordinates:
if we use ingoing null coordinate (v) and the radius (r) for basis
then we have a null-coordinate, and a space-coordinate above the horizon,
and a null-coordinate, and a time-coordinate below the horizon.
Usually we use time ad space coordinates together,
and we evolve a system in the direction increasing time.
In the case of EF-coordinates we can evolve the system
using the null-coordinate (v)?
But under the horizon r is a time coordinate,
we can evolve the system in r also?
 
  • #6
Thanks
 

1. What are Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates?

Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates are a type of coordinate system used to describe the spacetime around a black hole. They were developed by British astrophysicist Arthur Eddington and American physicist David Finkelstein in the 1950s.

2. How do Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates differ from other coordinate systems?

Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates are unique because they are specifically designed to eliminate the singularity at the center of a black hole in the coordinate system. This allows for a more accurate description of the spacetime around the black hole.

3. What is the significance of Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates in the study of black holes?

Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates are important in the study of black holes because they allow for a better understanding of the behavior of light and matter near the event horizon, the point of no return around a black hole. They also provide a way to describe the spacetime inside and outside of a black hole without encountering mathematical singularities.

4. How do Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates relate to the event horizon of a black hole?

Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates are particularly useful for describing the behavior of light and matter near the event horizon of a black hole. In these coordinates, the event horizon is represented as a null surface, meaning that the coordinates do not change as an object crosses the event horizon.

5. Are Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates used in practical applications?

While Eddington Finkelstein Coordinates are primarily used in theoretical studies of black holes, they have also been used in practical applications such as simulations of black hole mergers and the calculation of gravitational wave signals. They have also been used to study other astrophysical phenomena, such as the behavior of particles near neutron stars.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
351
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
889
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
43
Views
2K
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
24
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
37
Views
3K
Replies
13
Views
558
Back
Top