Thought experiment on the nature of light

In summary: ie. would an object that travels at the speed of light not decay at all in a frame of reference that is moving at a slower speed?
  • #1
rede96
663
16
There have been a number of very interesting posts lately around the nature of light. So I devised a simple thought experiment to try and understand it a bit more.

Say John and I are next to each other in rocket ships, at rest wrt to Jane, who is 1 light minute away in her rocket ship. All our clocks are synchronised.

We have an experiment planned that at exactly 1pm, Jane will send a light beam towards John and I.

At the same time, I will set off in the opposite direction to the light beam, moving away from it as it were.

My velocity is only slow wrt to John and Jane at 60 mph, therefore I will ignore the very small effects of time dilation between John, Jane and I.

The clock strikes 1pm and Jane fires the light beam and I set off.

I detect the light beam, stop my rocket and head back towards John in order to compare results.

What would I find for the following?

a) John would detect the light beam at exactly 1:01pm. Would I have detected the light beam also at 1:01pm or very slightly afterwards?

b) Would I have traveled exactly 1 mile away from John by the time I detected the light beam?

c) If there was a way to very accurately detect the decay in the photons from the light beam (Assuming the photons do decay with time) would John and I have detected the same amount of decay or would I have detected slightly more decay that John?

Hope that makes sense!
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You will detect the light beam slightly after 1:01pm and you will have traveled slightly more than 1 mile when you detect it.

Photons don't decay.
 
  • #3
ghwellsjr said:
You will detect the light beam slightly after 1:01pm and you will have traveled slightly more than 1 mile when you detect it.

That was pretty much as expected, thanks. Just wanted to make sure :)

ghwellsjr said:
Photons don't decay.

Shame, this was the bit I was really interested in. If photon's did decay, or there were some other matter with zero rest mass that did, I wondered if the measured decay would be the same for both John and me.

I.e. because traveling at c would mean the photon ( or similar ) would not have 'aged' relative to me or John.

Which then made me wonder than if anything that can travel at c would not decay relative to sub-light frames of reference?
 

What is a thought experiment?

A thought experiment is a hypothetical scenario that is used to explore and understand complex concepts or theories. It involves using one's imagination to consider different possibilities and outcomes without physically performing the experiment.

What is the nature of light?

The nature of light refers to its fundamental properties and characteristics, such as its wavelength, frequency, speed, and behavior. It has been studied and debated by scientists for centuries and has led to various theories and models, such as particle and wave theories.

How are thought experiments used to study the nature of light?

Thought experiments are often used in physics and other scientific fields to explore and test theories about the nature of light. They allow scientists to consider different scenarios and make predictions about how light may behave in certain situations, helping to refine and develop our understanding of its nature.

What are some famous thought experiments on the nature of light?

One of the most famous thought experiments on the nature of light is the "double-slit experiment" which helped support the wave theory of light. Another well-known example is Einstein's "light clock" experiment, which was used to explain the concept of time dilation in his theory of relativity.

Why are thought experiments important in understanding the nature of light?

Thought experiments allow scientists to explore and challenge existing theories about the nature of light. They also help to develop new ideas and theories, leading to a deeper understanding of this complex phenomenon. Without thought experiments, our understanding of the nature of light would be limited and progress in this field would be hindered.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
28
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
468
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
29
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
51
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
989
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
25
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Replies
39
Views
2K
Back
Top