Solve 3x + 1 - x - 1 = 2: Step-by-Step Guide

  • Thread starter footprints
  • Start date
BOTH of them to make sure they work. In summary, the equation \sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2 can be solved by squaring both sides twice and rearranging the equation to get 4(x-1)^2 - (3x+1)(x-1) = (x-1)(x-5) = 0. This gives two solutions: x=1 and x=5. It is important to check both solutions in the original equation to ensure they are valid.
  • #1
footprints
100
0
How do you solve this? [tex]\sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2[/tex]
I know it isn't 3x + 1 - x - 1 = 2.
This isn't homework. I just saw it somewhere else.
 
Mathematics news on Phys.org
  • #2
square both sides, then rearrange it so the radical that's left is on one side by itself, and then square again.
 
  • #3
Ok so I rearrange it and I get [tex]\sqrt{3x+1}=2+\sqrt{x-1}[/tex]
When you say square it, won't I get 3x +1 = 2 + x - 1?
 
  • #4
footprints said:
How do you solve this? [tex]\sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2[/tex]
I know it isn't 3x + 1 - x - 1 = 2.
This isn't homework. I just saw it somewhere else.


start with:
[tex] \sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2[/tex]

square both sides & simplify:
[tex] 2(x-1) = \sqrt{(3x+1)(x-1)} [/tex]

square both sides again:
[tex] 4(x-1)^2 = (3x+1)(x-1) [/tex]

move everything over to the left-hand side:
[tex] 4(x-1)^2 - (3x+1)(x-1) = 0[/tex]

simplify:
[tex] 4(x-1)^2 - (3x+1)(x-1) = (x-1)[4(x-1)-3x-1] = (x-1)(x-5) = 0 [/tex]

from the original equation, [tex] 1 \leq x [/tex] (so no sqrt of negative #s)


so it looks like the solution is x=1 & x=5

how did i do everybody? :blushing:
 
Last edited:
  • #5
another way to do it but similar to yours is the following :

[itex]\sqrt{3x+1}-\sqrt{x-1}=2 \rightarrow \sqrt{3x+1}=\sqrt{x-1}+2[/itex]
[itex]\sqrt{3x+1}^2=(\sqrt{x-1}+2)^2 \rightarrow 3x+1=x-1+2\cdot2\sqrt{x-1}+4[/itex]
[itex]3x+1=x-1+2\cdot2\sqrt{x-1}+4 \rightarrow 2x-2=2\cdot2\sqrt{x-1}[/itex]
[itex]x-1=2\sqrt{x-1} \rightarrow (x-1)^2=4\sqrt{x-1}^2[/itex]
[itex]x^2-2x+1=4(x-1)[/itex]

note : after finding the solution, you have to check if it is the answer by positioning it in the first equation. :shy:
 
  • #6
fourier jr: How did you go from [tex] \sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2[/tex] to [tex] 2(x-1) = \sqrt{(3x+1)(x-1)} [/tex]? Did you skip any steps? Cuz I'm a bit slow.

boaz: Where did the 2 from [tex]2\sqrt{x-1}+4[/tex] come from?
 
Last edited:
  • #7
fourier jr said:
how did i do everybody? :blushing:
Looks good to me :biggrin:

footprints said:
fourier jr: How did you go from [tex] \sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2[/tex] to [tex] 2(x-1) = \sqrt{(3x+1)(x-1)} [/tex]? Did you skip any steps? Cuz I'm a bit slow.

boaz: Where did the 2 from [tex]2\sqrt{x-1}+4[/tex] come from?

Square both sides of:

[tex]\sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2[/tex]

You'll get:
[tex](3x+1)+(x-1)-2\sqrt{(3x+1)(x-1)}=4[/tex]

which can be rearranged to:
[tex]2(x-1)=\sqrt{(3x+1)(x-1)}[/tex]
 
  • #8
footprints said:
boaz: Where did the 2 from [tex]2\sqrt{x-1}+4[/tex] come from?

according to next formula :
[itex](a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2[/itex]
however, in your example :
[itex]a=2; b=\sqrt{x-1}[/itex]
 
  • #9
footprints said:
fourier jr: How did you go from [tex] \sqrt{3x+1} - \sqrt{x-1} = 2[/tex] to [tex] 2(x-1) = \sqrt{(3x+1)(x-1)} [/tex]? Did you skip any steps? Cuz I'm a bit slow.

ya i squared, simplified & put the square-root stuff one side in one step
 
  • #10
I think it is slightly easier to follow if you shift [itex]\sqrt{x-1}[/itex] to the other side first: [itex]\sqrt{3x+1}= \sqrt{x-1}+ 2[/itex] . Squaring both sides gives
[itex]3x+ 1= x-1+ 4\sqrt{x-1}+ 4[/itex].

Now subtract x+ 3 from both sides: [itex]2x- 2= 4\sqrt{x-1}[/itex] and divide by 2.
[itex]x- 1= 2\sqrt{x-1}[/itex] and square again.

(x-1)2= x2- 2x+ 1= 4(x- 1) so x2- 6x+ 5= 0.
That factors as (x- 5)(x- 1)= 0 which has x= 1 and x= 5 as solutions.

Checking: if x= 1 then 3x+1= 4 and x-1= 0. Yes [itex]\sqrt{4}-\sqrt{0}= 2[/itex].
If x= 5, then 3x+1= 16 and x- 1= 4. Yes, [itex]\sqrt{16}- \sqrt{4}= 4-2= 2[/itex].
 
  • #11
boaz said:
according to next formula :
[itex](a+b)^2=a^2+2ab+b^2[/itex]
however, in your example :
[itex]a=2; b=\sqrt{x-1}[/itex]
Oh so that's how you get it :rolleyes:
Thank to all who helped. :smile:
 
  • #12
u guys makes it too complicated. why don't u just substitute 'x' by 1
 
  • #13
because although x=1 works, it may not be the only solution. after fiddling with the original equation you get a quadratic which has 2 solutions.
 
Last edited:

What is the equation being solved?

The equation being solved is 3x + 1 - x - 1 = 2.

What is the first step in solving this equation?

The first step is to combine like terms on both sides of the equation. In this case, the x and 1 terms can be combined to give 2x = 2.

What is the second step in solving this equation?

The second step is to isolate the variable by dividing both sides of the equation by the coefficient of x. In this case, dividing both sides by 2 gives x = 1.

What is the third step in solving this equation?

The third step is to check the solution by plugging it back into the original equation. In this case, plugging in x = 1 gives 3(1) + 1 - (1) - 1 = 2, which simplifies to 3 = 2. Since this is a false statement, the solution is not correct.

What is the final step in solving this equation?

The final step is to determine the correct solution. In this case, there is no solution because the original equation is inconsistent. This means that there is no value of x that will make the equation true.

Similar threads

Replies
4
Views
849
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
2K
Replies
6
Views
956
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • General Math
Replies
13
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Math
Replies
18
Views
2K
Back
Top