- #1
KingNothing
- 882
- 4
Wouldn't you think that some of the charities for smaller-spread conditions would provide a bigger benefit to the world if they were out supporting a more widespread cause?
There is no definitive list of "useless" charities as opinions may vary. However, some charities that have been criticized for not effectively supporting their stated cause include those that have high administrative costs, lack transparency, or have been involved in financial scandals.
Determining whether a charity is "useless" is subjective and can be based on various factors. Some common ways to evaluate a charity's effectiveness include looking at their financial reports, impact reports, transparency, and accountability measures.
This is a highly debated topic. Some argue that even "useless" charities can still make a small positive impact and should be supported. Others believe that resources should be directed towards more effective charities to maximize impact. Ultimately, it is up to the individual to decide where they want to donate their money.
In some cases, yes. If a charity is not using their resources effectively or misusing funds, it can have a negative impact on the cause they claim to support. This is why it is important for donors to research and carefully consider which charities they choose to support.
There are a few things that can be done to address the issue. Donors can do their own research and due diligence before donating to a charity. Additionally, there are organizations that evaluate and rate charities based on their effectiveness and impact. These ratings can help donors make informed decisions about where to donate their money. Government regulations and increased transparency and accountability measures can also help address the issue of "useless" charities.