GM gives voice once again to its American workers with the .

  • Thread starter GCT
  • Start date
  • Tags
    gm
In summary, GM has announced an employee discount, but many are questioning how many actual GM employees will benefit from it. This comes after thousands of GM jobs were moved from the US for cost reduction, causing resentment among American workers. The company has a reputation for mistreating its employees, and the union representing them is being criticized for driving the company under with their unreasonable demands. Some believe that unions have outlasted their need and are causing workers to lose their jobs. Others argue that GM's near monopoly and history of producing low-quality cars is to blame for their current struggles. Despite portraying an "American" image, GM is seen as a terrible company by many and is not a model for American success.
  • #1
GCT
Science Advisor
Homework Helper
1,748
0
GM gives voice once again to its American workers with the ...

GM Employee Discount , yeah the workers in that commercial sure seemed to be excited about it , I wonder how many actual GM employees are celebrating. All of this comes after thousands of GM jobs were moved from the US for the sake of reducing cost much to the celebration of thousands of non-US workers and pork and beans every night for former GM workers.

GM- quintessentially American.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2


I'm sorry but GM workers get paid a lot of money. The majority of them are spoiled workers.

Sorry, but I lost respect for GM workers and the union that represents them.

Note: I know people who worked for GM in the union and as management and both agreed that GM workers are slackers and do next to nothing for the money. I also know a guy who would go into automotive factories to install robots that caused thousands of layoffs. The funny part is that GM even offered it's employees free education to operate these robots before getting installed so that they can secure their job. The actual funny part is how the majority of the workers were resisting and now... they're out of a job. LOL!
 
  • #3


GCT, what is your objection exactly? That GM shouldn't be cutting prices to sell more cars?
 
  • #4


It seems that they are portraying an " American " image - "American" meaning the country folk and the working class population- the key seems to be drawing a distinction to Japan. And yet they have a reputation for mistreating this population set, aside from those examples that JasonRox mentioned.

No big objections really, I just would not be that happy if I was a GM employee, if everyone else is getting the discount then why would it be called an employee discount?
 
  • #5


The GM workers who are out of a job have themselves and their union to blame. You cannot demand to be paid more than you are worth and expect to keep your job.
 
  • #6


GCT said:
No big objections really, I just would not be that happy if I was a GM employee, if everyone else is getting the discount then why would it be called an employee discount?
That was just an advertising gimick.

DaleSpam said:
The GM workers who are out of a job have themselves and their union to blame. You cannot demand to be paid more than you are worth and expect to keep your job.
Unions have long outlasted the need for them and for years have been causing workers to lose jobs because of unrealistic demands completely out of touch with the reality of the market.
 
  • #7


Evo said:
Unions have long outlasted the need for them and for years have been causing workers to lose jobs because of unrealistic demands completely out of touch with the reality of the market.

Yes, but the GM union is basically the worst model ever for a union.
 
  • #8


That is an interesting comment. What is so bad about the GM union in particular that makes it worse than other unions?
 
  • #9


GCT said:
No big objections really, I just would not be that happy if I was a GM employee, if everyone else is getting the discount then why would it be called an employee discount?

It's really no different than offering a rebate that would make up the difference between the sticker price and employee price. It's better to sell some cars for less than none at all.

But, I agree with the others that the employees have nobody but themselves and their unions to blame. They've driven themselves out of the competitive market with their unreasonable expectations for higher salaries and better benefits, not to mention what the union is likely skimming off the top. Those employees probably would be extremely happy just to see all the money getting paid as union dues show up in their take-home pay instead. A company can't afford to do both though...pay the union dues and increase workers' salaries. The fat cats in the union are the ones driving the company under and jeopardizing the employees' jobs, and at the same time convincing the employees to be discontent with their jobs and pay. It doesn't cost a lot to live in the towns where these factories are, the workers make ample money to live quite comfortably, and that for simple skilled labor type jobs.
 
  • #10


Moonbear said:
It's really no different than offering a rebate that would make up the difference between the sticker price and employee price. It's better to sell some cars for less than none at all.

But, I agree with the others that the employees have nobody but themselves and their unions to blame. They've driven themselves out of the competitive market with their unreasonable expectations for higher salaries and better benefits, not to mention what the union is likely skimming off the top. Those employees probably would be extremely happy just to see all the money getting paid as union dues show up in their take-home pay instead. A company can't afford to do both though...pay the union dues and increase workers' salaries. The fat cats in the union are the ones driving the company under and jeopardizing the employees' jobs, and at the same time convincing the employees to be discontent with their jobs and pay. It doesn't cost a lot to live in the towns where these factories are, the workers make ample money to live quite comfortably, and that for simple skilled labor type jobs.

It's not only the union but also GM abused there near monopoly for years! They produced garbage for years and now it's catching up to them.

Terrible company all around. Should not be represented as a model American company as it's a horrible model.
 
  • #11


GCT said:
It seems that they are portraying an " American " image - "American" meaning the country folk and the working class population- the key seems to be drawing a distinction to Japan. And yet they have a reputation for mistreating this population set, aside from those examples that JasonRox mentioned.
This isn't about Japan, it is about the status quo of how some (edit: added that for Jason - he's right) American companies and American workers work. The Japanese car companies that come into the US turn out better and cheaper products and have happier and more productive workers.
No big objections really, I just would not be that happy if I was a GM employee, if everyone else is getting the discount then why would it be called an employee discount?
It's a marketing gimick and I'm sure GM employees are smart enough to know that.
 
  • #12


DaleSpam said:
That is an interesting comment. What is so bad about the GM union in particular that makes it worse than other unions?
I'm not sure I necessarily agree with the comment, but the GM union is doing a stellar job of helping the company go under. It may be tough to win the title belt, though - the steelworkers union has had that sown up for a decade now.
 
  • #13


Yeah, I did my grad school in Cleveland, so I know a little more about steelworkers unions than auto workers unions.
 
  • #14


JasonRox said:
It's not only the union but also GM abused there near monopoly for years! They produced garbage for years and now it's catching up to them.

Those events were 30 years ago. And it caught up with them 20 years ago.

What's new now is Korea. US and Japan used to divide up the US market, with a few percent going to Germany. GM could survive a 2-way split. It can't survive a 3-way split.

GM also recognized their quality problems and attempted to address them via Saturn, almost 20 years ago. At some level, it was a success - Saturn was profitable by 1993 and had customer satisfaction scores more typical of a Japanese company. But the UAW was bitterly opposed to the Saturn way, and in particular the compensation model - workers got a base pay, with bonuses tied to overall company sales and satisfaction scores. Ultimately the UAW won the battle. Whether they lost the war remains to be seen.
 
  • #15


I would just like to add that I find it amusing the way General Motors brags about the pseudo-fuel efficiency of their cars. 28 mpg? I was impressed by that 15 years ago. Even my brother's old Geo Metro is supposed to be comparable with a Prius.
 

1. What does "GM gives voice once again to its American workers" mean?

"GM gives voice once again to its American workers" means that General Motors, a large American car company, is providing its workers with a platform to make their voices heard and have a say in the company's decisions and policies.

2. How is GM giving voice to its American workers?

GM is giving voice to its American workers through various methods such as surveys, focus groups, town hall meetings, and employee feedback systems. These platforms allow workers to share their opinions, suggestions, and concerns with the company's management.

3. Why is it important for companies to give voice to their workers?

Giving voice to workers is important because it fosters a sense of inclusivity and empowers employees to contribute to the company's success. It also helps companies gain valuable insights and ideas from their employees, leading to better decision-making and a more positive work culture.

4. What are the benefits of GM giving voice to its American workers?

The benefits of GM giving voice to its American workers include increased employee satisfaction and engagement, improved communication and collaboration between management and employees, and a stronger sense of ownership and commitment towards the company's goals and values.

5. How will this initiative impact GM as a company?

This initiative is expected to have a positive impact on GM as a company by promoting transparency, trust, and accountability within the organization. It can also lead to better products and services, increased productivity and innovation, and a stronger reputation in the market.

Similar threads

  • General Discussion
Replies
18
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
2
Replies
50
Views
6K
  • Art, Music, History, and Linguistics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • General Discussion
Replies
33
Views
5K
  • General Engineering
Replies
22
Views
5K
Replies
28
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
  • General Discussion
Replies
9
Views
4K
  • Biology and Medical
Replies
5
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
2
Views
3K
Back
Top