The equilibrium in the universe ?

In summary, the conversation discusses the concept of equilibrium in relation to matter and the universe. It is agreed that all matter tends towards equilibrium, but the definition of equilibrium may vary. The conversation also explores the idea of equilibrium in different systems, such as the example of protons and neutrons in the nucleus. It is noted that even in equilibrium, particles may still have kinetic energy. The conversation also briefly touches on the ultimate fate of the universe and the idea of "heat death." Overall, the conversation concludes that the concept of equilibrium is complex and can be applied to various situations.
  • #1
dido28
14
0
is it true that all matter and everything in this universe microscopic or macroscopic have a tendency to go to an equilibrium state ?
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #2
Generally - yes.
Though the word "equilibrium" may have different uses.
Did you have a particular situation in mind?
 
  • #3
the professor asked us that question and we told him the same think so he gave us that problematic : he asked us about the state of protons and neutrons in the nucleus , we told him that they are in equilebrium, and he said but they are always in vibration and he let us like that
 
  • #4
Vibration is a bad name for the ground state of nuclei (and all stable nuclei are in their ground state). In equilibrium, the nucleons have kinetic energy. That is no problem - in a gas in equilibrium with a finite temperature, atoms are moving as well.
 
  • #5
I guess that's like when a man is sleeping he still breeds to keep himself alive, no matter how deep asleep you are your heart is still ticking at a minimal rate and so elementary particles do something similar I guess.
i apologize if this is a bad analogy but maybe it would help the OP to understand better.
 
  • #6
@dido28: I guess your professor wanted you to think the different types of equilibrium.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_types_of_equilibrium
Had you said something else - he'd have been able to set a different problem, apparently contradicting what you said. Notice, when I answered you, I qualified my answer.

@Crazymechanic: personally, I try not to breed while I'm asleep - fortunately I find the act wakes me up ;)

A man asleep is not, technically, in equilibrium ... he is aging for example. However, he tends towards some sort of equilibrium with his environment which will be achieved after he is dead.

Probably the thermodynamic example is best here - a closed system may start out with different temperatures in different places but, over time, will settle to an equilibrium where the temperature is uniform throughout. Since the system is closed however, it still has the same total amount of energy it started out with. The individual particles of the gas are still moving (that is what "temperature" means). Thus: "equilibrium" does not imply that energy has been lost. Therefore, pointing out that some system has components in motion does not mean the system is not in equilibrium: the professor needs to find another counter-example.
 
  • #7
Ok Simon I was thinking more of that when we sleep we inhale , exhale air to stay alive ok not the best analogy.

Well but then the universe even when reaching total equilibrium will still not be totally heat dead as there will be some even small but some kinetic/thermal energy left that will act as elementary particle movement?
 
  • #8
Total equilibrium would be "heat death" - everything has some kinetic energy (measured in some arbitrary reference frame), but it is completely unordered and you cannot use it in any way.
 
  • #9
Aren't there several different models for the final fate of the Universe?
Anyway - as far as the question post #1 is concerned - since ultimate fate of the whole Universe tends to an equilibrium of some kind it follows that everything must tend to an equilibrium ... we are witnessing the stages things go through on their journey.

re. the bound nucleons example, then, it is fair to say the nuclei have yet to reach any final - ultimate - equilibrium ... observing something is not at equilibrium says nothing about it's tendency. (Though - observing: "everything tends to the ultimate fate of the Universe itself", may be seen as a trivial answer.)

I think the question is now answered pretty completely, and some techniques demonstrated for handling this sort of question in the future.
 

1. What is the concept of equilibrium in the universe?

Equilibrium in the universe refers to a state of balance where the forces and energies within the universe are in a state of harmony. This means that there is no net change or movement in the overall state of the universe.

2. How is equilibrium maintained in the universe?

The concept of equilibrium in the universe is maintained through various physical laws and principles, such as the law of conservation of energy and the law of conservation of mass. These laws ensure that energy and matter are constantly being exchanged and transformed, but the overall balance remains the same.

3. Is the equilibrium in the universe static or dynamic?

The equilibrium in the universe can be both static and dynamic. It is static in the sense that the overall balance and stability of the universe remains constant, but it is also dynamic as there is constant movement and exchange of energy and matter within the universe.

4. What are the consequences of disrupting the equilibrium in the universe?

Disrupting the equilibrium in the universe can have significant consequences, such as causing changes in the structure and composition of celestial bodies, altering the flow of energy and matter, and potentially leading to the formation or destruction of galaxies and other celestial objects.

5. Can the equilibrium in the universe be altered by human activities?

It is unlikely that human activities have a significant impact on the overall equilibrium in the universe. However, human actions can have a local or temporary effect on certain aspects of the universe, such as the environment on Earth. The overall equilibrium of the universe is largely influenced by natural processes and phenomena.

Similar threads

Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Cosmology
Replies
15
Views
2K
Replies
19
Views
668
  • Cosmology
Replies
17
Views
1K
Replies
24
Views
983
Replies
23
Views
1K
Replies
13
Views
455
Replies
8
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
1K
Back
Top