Register to reply

Something weird with my Kurie-Plot (Beta Spectroscopy)

by virtuosowanaB
Tags: beta, kurieplot, spectroscopy, weird
Share this thread:
virtuosowanaB
#1
Sep4-13, 06:03 PM
P: 6
So I'm doing a Beta Spectroscopy of Sodium and apart from the Energy Spectrum, I'm intending to use the Kurie Plot to incorporate the Coulomb Correction Factor F(Z,p). But when I try plotting the data, my K(Z,p) has an incredibly huge number, on the order of 1020 and the linear graph looks weird. My Count Rate vs Energy selected graph is alright.

Here are my steps.

I am using the equation

- K(Z,p) = √{ N(p)/(p2F(z,p))}



- F(Z,p), I'm using = {2πη}/{ 1 - e(-22πη)}


where η = (Zq2)/( ħv)


- To calculate v, I'm using v = BqR/m


- So to calculate p2 I'm using (mv)2 = (BqR)2




- Daughter nucleus of the decay is Ne. Z = 10.




- For N(p), I'm using the number of counts measured over an interval of
4 minutes.

The rest are pretty much standard constants.

So for each corresponding count, there would be a corresponding energy selected.

And I will plot the K(Z,p) on the y-axis, vs Energy (keV) on the x-axis.

Is there anything wrong that I'm doing with my Kurie Variable calculation?
Phys.Org News Partner Physics news on Phys.org
Vibrational motion of a single molecule measured in real time
Researchers demonstrate ultra low-field nuclear magnetic resonance using Earth's magnetic field
Bubbling down: Discovery suggests surprising uses for common bubbles
fzero
#2
Sep5-13, 01:40 AM
Sci Advisor
HW Helper
PF Gold
P: 2,603
You might want to show a data point and your calculations including all units being carried through. There's nothing obviously wrong with what you've explained so far, but I will note that the electric charge in SI units is ##1.6\cdot 10^{-19}##~C, which might explain the overall scaling problem you claim to have.
virtuosowanaB
#3
Sep5-13, 02:43 AM
P: 6
Here is a link of my spreadsheet: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/...2c&usp=sharing

It has my Kurie Plot Data, as well as my Energy Spectrum Data.
My adjusted R-squared value for the Energy Spectrum is 0.99, which I believe has a decent accuracy.

I also read in http://www.hep.wisc.edu/~prepost/407/beta/beta.pdf on page 10, it says I could just plot sqrt(N/B^3).
I tried that too but my linear graph looks really messed up. I'm suspecting since my values of B are really small, it blows the numbers up to a really huge extent. But it should still work shouldnt it?
Is there something I'm overlooking?

Thanks a bunch

edit: Also I read from here:

http://www.phywe.de/index.php/fuseac...e/P2523200.pdf

which mentions that "The greatly intensified background in the 22Na spectrum is attributable to the 511 keV annihilation radiation."

Does this mean that the energy spectrum kind of shifts towards the 511 keV side, due to another "mini-peak" in energy?

mfb
#4
Sep5-13, 09:17 AM
Mentor
P: 11,819
Something weird with my Kurie-Plot (Beta Spectroscopy)

If column G is the velocity in m/s, you have velocities that exceed the speed of light - I would expect that you need relativistic formulas there. That will also lead to problems with the approximation you use for F(Z,p).

K is basically inverse momentum, it will have a large numerical value (in SI units) due to the small electron momentum in the denominator. So what - you can express it in units of c/eV if you prefer smaller numbers.


Register to reply

Related Discussions
Difference between raman-spectroscopy and usual spectroscopy? General Physics 1
Mathematica array plot won't plot and it erases all of my stored variables Math & Science Software 1
Kurie plot High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics 0
Rasterized density plot + countour plot in Mathematica (to solve EPS issues) Math & Science Software 0
(gamma)ma=F-[F.(beta)]beta How derive this? Special & General Relativity 9