The Possibility of "Pure" Planets

In summary, it seems very unlikely for a planet to be almost entirely one element. However, it is possible for a planet to be predominantly one element/chemical.
  • #1
MrModesty
10
0
"Pure" planets?

What is the likelihood of a planet being almost entirely one element? Is it possible to have a planet that is purely water?
 
Astronomy news on Phys.org
  • #2


Water is not an element.
 
  • #3


Vanadium 50 said:
Water is not an element.

Thanks for not answering my question.

Regardless of whether water is an element or not, the question remains the same. Is it possible for a planet to be purely anything? I'm sure it is very rare, if not almost impossible, but have we discovered planets that are predominantly one element/chemical? It seems that with the size and diversity of the universe, it has to be possible. Is there anyone thing that prevents this from happening?
 
  • #4


Well in the early universe there was only hydrogen and some helium with a dash of lithium. So if you somehow had a lone, low-mass globular cluster that was totally without giant stars that convert hydrogen into the other elements, then it would remain mostly hydrogen (at least for a while). Then you might get some hydrogen gas giant exoplanets around whatever stars did form. IMHO, this would be very unlikely, but possible.
A “purely water” exoplanet would have to be small or the core water would separate into hydrogen and oxygen due to the temperature.
 
  • #5


You need to better define your question. Does "Almost entirely" mean >90%? >99? >99.9%? Also, what does "purely anything" mean?

Jupiter is composed of 90% hydrogen and 10% other elements (by number of atoms). Pure water is 67% hydrogen and 33% other elements (again, by number of atoms). So I could argue that Jupiter is at least as "pure" as your example. Nevertheless, I don't think you will agree with that. So you will need to carefully specify what exactly you mean.
 
  • #6


MrModesty said:
What is the likelihood of a planet being almost entirely one element? Is it possible to have a planet that is purely water?

It seems highly unlikely, except for the previously mentioned gas giants which are mostly hydrogen. Perhaps a planet can form an iron core like the Earth and then have its outer core sheared off by some catastrophe? Or melted off?

The heavier elements typically find their way into stellar nurseries due to supernovae, and this means a pretty good mix of heavier elements are all intermixed, having been formed in layers in the star prior to the explosion, and formed from the explosion itself. It would probably be difficult for these to just separate into individual elements naturally. I'm sure there may be cases with higher concentrations of iron or silicon due to a succession of similar stars creating similar elements, but I doubt you'd ever see 100%.

I think the closest thing you have in the universe is a neutron star, which is just one big pile of neutrons.
 
  • #7


I think the closest thing you have in the universe is a neutron star, which is just one big pile of neutrons.[/QUOTE]

almost made of entirely nuetrons, also has some protons and electrons that didnt combined
 
  • #8


clm321 said:
I think the closest thing you have in the universe is a neutron star, which is just one big pile of neutrons.

almost made of entirely nuetrons, also has some protons and electrons that didnt combined[/QUOTE]

If you know that then you know more than the people who study them. Our knowledge of nuclear matter in such conditions is seriously lacking - that's why every new observation of neutron star radii, for example, gives us new insights into what's going on inside.
 

1. What is a "pure" planet?

A "pure" planet is a theoretical concept that refers to a planet that has never been inhabited or altered by any form of life. It is a planet that exists in its natural state, without any human or alien influence.

2. Is it possible for there to be a "pure" planet?

It is currently unknown if there are any "pure" planets in existence. While there are many planets that have not yet been explored or inhabited by humans, it is difficult to determine if they have been influenced by other forms of life or external forces.

3. What would make a planet "impure"?

A planet can become "impure" through various means, such as being inhabited by living organisms, being altered by geological processes, or being influenced by extraterrestrial forces. Any form of life or outside influence can change the natural state of a planet.

4. How could we determine if a planet is "pure"?

It would be challenging to determine if a planet is truly "pure" without exploring it extensively. Scientists could analyze the planet's atmosphere, surface, and geological history to look for signs of life or external influences. However, it is difficult to definitively prove the absence of any outside influences.

5. What implications would a "pure" planet have for science and exploration?

If a "pure" planet were to be discovered, it would have significant implications for our understanding of the universe and the possibilities for extraterrestrial life. It could also provide valuable insights into the origins and evolution of planets. However, it is important to consider the ethical implications of potentially disturbing a planet in its natural state for the sake of exploration.

Similar threads

Replies
6
Views
668
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
5
Views
698
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
3
Views
978
Replies
5
Views
191
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
18
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
19
Views
1K
  • Astronomy and Astrophysics
Replies
14
Views
1K
Back
Top