Race car suspension Class

In summary,-The stock car suspension is important for understanding the complexity of a Formula Cars suspension.-When designing a (front) suspension, geometry layout is critical.-spindle choice and dimensions, kingpin and steering inclination, wheel offset, frame height, car track width, camber change curve, static roll center height and location and roll axis location are major factors.-The first critical thing to do is to establish the roll center height and lateral location. The roll center is established by fixed points and angles of the A-arms. These pivot points and angles also establish the camber gain and bump steer.-I have used Suspension Analyzer for years on Super late Model stock cars as
  • #36
kenny

Panhard bar should be mounted level at the desired RC height to begin with... don't know about that rule of thumb.
minimum stagger you need is:
D + .5 (TW) x CL \ D - .5 (TW)
where D is the track diameter in feet
TW = rear track width of the car in feet ( divide inch measurement by 12)
CL = the left rear tire circumference

example- race track has 200 ft. diameter
car has 64 inch track (64 / 12 = 5.33 inch)
left rear is 86 inch circumference.
run the numbers and you get 88.33 inch right rear circumference or MINIMUM 2.33 inch stagger.
if you run a spool add 10 percent to minimum stagger..if the track banking is 0 to 10 degrees, add another ten percent..if banking is 15 degrees up..take off ten percent from min. stagger

Four link has advantage of good forward bite because the upper links are mounted up hill. anytime the forward link is up hill the the rear end is trying to go up under the chassis during acceleration and this increases loading on the tires, these 4 links setups create oversteer as the body rolls. the right rear is pushed back and the left rear is pulled forward which helps the car turn going through the corner without breaking traction.

all I can tell you is ball park settings on the links..uppers should be 15 to 17 degrees up hill angle. the right upper max angle is 18 degrees and min. angle is 14 degrees.
the left upper usually has 3 to 5 degrees less angle than the right so the two links will be parallel through the corner. the lower links are usually 2 inches shorter. this reduces roll oversteer. the most common setting on the lowers is 5 degrees down.
 
  • Like
Likes supersheen
Engineering news on Phys.org
  • #37
thanks guys...

Kingpin inclination angle is 10 degrees. Hmmmm...wut if I was to build a RF spindle with only ...lets say 6 degrees ?
I say I would like to run around 2" of stagger, because the super late models here run that kind of stagger. I figured that if that was good enough for them then I should be able to run the same. Theres guys out here looking for 5 and 6" of stagger for the sprint cars...They must be nutz.

Dont get me wrong...my cars not a pail, and I run very well, But I am allways interested in learning and going faster. I appreciate all your inputs.

Hopefully next year Ill have a set of scales, so I can try like you said Mike...Put the car on the scales and see what it does as you turn left.

I have 1 race left this year...Ill try a panhard change. I will start with the rear bar level and will lower the front bar...Ill make a axle bracket with +1 and 2" drop and try them both.

Thanks again...Kenny
 
  • #38
I am going to measure our track this weekend...when u say diameter of track Mike...do you mean at the goove?....out side of track ? Add inside and out side then divide by 2 to get an average ?
Im interested in seeing what this formula says I should have for stagger

Kenny
 
  • #39
prankster16a said:
I am going to measure our track this weekend...when u say diameter of track Mike...do you mean at the goove?....out side of track ? Add inside and out side then divide by 2 to get an average ?
Im interested in seeing what this formula says I should have for stagger

Kenny

Kenny i would measure the dfiameter of YOUR groove you run..or the hot dogs hot groove as this is where you want the stagger to work...i have driven to various round tracks on off days and actually tape measured the turns and took a protractror level fionder to measure the banking...
also we ran nitrogen to make sure the stagger grew minimum amount...
you are right in that 5 inch stagger is HUGE...go with the super late model boys as starting point..

keep the rear roll centers about 1 to 3 inch taller than the front or it will push..and i know you know this but make one small change at a time and document everything.
before messing wit hthe roll centers try adding more up hill angle to the top links like 2 degrees at a time. then when you are really hooked up and start pushing..look at RC changes...
 
  • Like
Likes Racedad46
  • #40
Yes...I use nitrogen in the tires as well as tire reliefs.

Now...heres an argument I've had with more then a few people about setting tire reliefs.

If you ask Hoosier they tell u to set them 5PSI higher then your starting pressure..this doesn't make sense to me...if my RR tire says it wants 15PSI...should I not set my releif to 15PSI to start with, even when the tires cold ? I know you build pressure as the tire gets hot, so isn't that why we run a relief ??
Typicalaly what I set my bleeders to is

LF 14PSI RF 15PSI

LR 7-10PSI RR 15PSI

I have found that buy varying LR tire pressure that the car is much more responsive the using the adjuster nut on the spring ( I am told that 1PSI change in tire pressure = 1/2 a percent change in cross )

As far as hooked up and pushing...thats where I am at now...front end feels real light coming off
 
  • #41
pop offs

tire relief valves ( pop offs) are tire valves you can pre set to pop offor open at a specific PSI. ( kenny i know you know this,,,i detail this for the uninitiated)
these come with springs set for a PSI range. I have Longacre pop offs and they have a set of springs for 3-15 PSI and springs for 15 and up PSI. they tell us to set the pop off PSI 2 pounds above desired range. Just like a tire valve stem that has a spring to close the valve..these have a spring to keep it closed. The springs are linear and pretty accurate. so you just have to live with the preload..Rebco, i think.. has a higher default rate and wider range (which means the pop off value is not as sensative ) so i would check with the manufacturer. it is all relavent anyway as you will pyro the tire at three places to see the temps and adjust anyway..
 
  • #42
Mike.....where does rear panhard bar adjustment most effect chassis handling ??
Through the middle and coming off ??
Front panhard bar adjustment gettin in ??

Thanks...kenny
 
  • #43
The distance between Center of Gravity (CG) ad the Roll Center (RC) is important. The panhard bar is easily adjusted ( hence the RC). the shorter the distance, the softer the springs because the lever length is shorter. with this in mind let review the three phases of handling problems..note if a car is loose going into the turn, there are ten adjustments you can do, with brake bias , RC height , stagger, cross weight and spring rate being easiest to change.

Loose going in ( corner entry) oversteer
too much rear brake bias, RC too high, rt. ft. spring too soft, right rear spring too stiff, ft. sway bar too soft, too much stagger, more cross weight ( add wedge) rt. rear tire over inflated, shocks need tuned, wheel tracking- rt. rear wheel moved outward too far relative to rt., front

Middle of the turn car is loose
more cross weight
reduce stagger
lower rear RC
rt. ft spring too soft
rt. rear spring too stiff
rt. rear tire pressure to high
ft sway bar too soft

loose coming out of the turn
stagger is main thing to look at, if loose coming out, reduce stagger
increase cross weight
soften rt. rear spring or stiffen left rear spring
rt. rear tire over inflated

if you have under steer..( pushing..) do the opposite of above

so instead of changing the springs you can tune by the panhard bar..but..ultimately you want to run lower RC than the other guy and this will mean changing to different springs
 
  • Like
Likes supersheen
  • #44
Back again...Mike, I am curious about the front roll center location left to right in a pavement sprint car. I've noticed that Beast and a few others have the stand off on the right front for the panhard mount quite close to the frame, where as my car has the stand off quite close to the coil over. Let's say for arqument sakes that my front panhard bar is 6" longer then on a Beast chassis. Assuming that the roll center falls in the middle of the front panhard , then my front roll center would be 3" farther to the right then the Beast chassis ( also assuming that they both mount to the axle in the same location relative to the LF ) ? Now Bob East is no dummy and I am assuming he's done this for a reason. My friends tour car has a front roll center 3" under the left front tire ( Kelly Tanner's old chassis ) I have to assume this was done on purpose as well.

As allways I look forward to your response...Kenny
 
  • #45
I had to read your prior posts ..you have 10 high Roll Center..and run pavement, not dirt track
i know the Emod guys run RC offset 4 inch bias to right for jacking effect..but these Emod guys use the General Motors Metric frame..A-arms coil springs off big GM cars as cost saving measure..( cost savings and Racing is like saying you get lots of sex after being married for 5 years...yeah right...)
straight axle rockets like you have use leaf springs / panhard bar set up on the front which are least expensive, lightest , simplest form of positive locating method.
the axle does not move purely vertical, it arcs around the chassis pivot with radius equal to the length of the P rod, so either the axle or the chassis has to shift sideways a bit whenever the axle moves vertically up or down over bumps...you got perfectly smooth track , right??
one draw back is the spring tries to fight the panhard bar during movement so to keep the lateral movement to a minimum the longest Panhard bar as possible is used.
finally the roll center is located where the center line of the P bar intersects with the center line of the car so it moves some what when either axle travels vertically or the car rolls.
i would stick with offset to the right..dirt guys run offset to the left..which is their hot setup..exactly where is your front RC offset from vehicle center line?
 
  • #46
Mike...my front panhard bar length is 31" OAL. From the center of the axle to the panhard mount on the left side of the axle is 11.5"
 
  • #47
Mike...one more thing. Should I make a " bolt-on " front panhard bar bracket for the axle so I can tip it up and down to keep the bar level as I move it up or down on the frame ??

Thanks...kenny
 
  • #48
Kenny
i am in dallas for sales meeting but will post when i get back..
thanks..
rm
 
  • #49
*Bookmarks and links to FSAE Forums, if you don't mind me doing so?*
 
  • #50
Ranger Mike said:
Kenny
i am in dallas for sales meeting but will post when i get back..
thanks..
rm

Thanks Mike...preciate it
 
  • #51
prankster16a said:
Mike...my front panhard bar length is 31" OAL. From the center of the axle to the panhard mount on the left side of the axle is 11.5"

Kenny, please confirm the distance the pbar crosses the vehicle center line as this is the roll center.
 
  • #52
Ranger Mike said:
Kenny, please confirm the distance the pbar crosses the vehicle center line as this is the roll center.

These #'s are correct Mike. I can't move the mount on the axle any farther to the left, because the coil over is right there. There is about 1/2" clearance between the frame and the coil over and its only 7" to the king pin CL from there ( just enough room for the steering arm to clear the coil over and 4 link brackets.) This car has exceptional LS for a sprint car at 58.2% LS without driver. From the center of the rear end its 31" to the outside of the LR and 43" to the outside of the RR ( the max offset allowed by our rules ) the front end is 1/2" narrower on each side.
 
  • Like
Likes Dirtracer8
  • #53
kenny
sounds like we can not change the RC via panhard bar...let me talk to some old hands at the track tommorow..
 
  • #54
Mike...would it matter if the panhard bar was mounted off the back side of the axle ? I could get it closer to the LF then...between the 4 link brackets ??


Thanks...Kenny
 
  • #55
http://www.afcoracing.com/tech_pages/panhard.shtml
this is a very good link to study..about panhard bar
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #56
as again...

ranger rules...lol

it helps that the first 2 books you list I have

dr
 
  • #57
thats great...thanks Mike
 
  • #58
Kenny let me check with my software guy to see if he has program to calculate roll center on your car..we are at the point where we got to look at other things to drop the RC..all you do is tape measure mounting points and plug them into the program to see how it effects RC location..
 
  • #59
Thanks Mike....I eagerly await your response
 
  • #60
How do we inplement skyhook control for this semiactive suspension systems?
 
  • #61
So ...Mike. Here's one for ya. I've got 4 pavement sprint cars that I tune. Two of which I built. 2 of the 4 are a long 4 bar ( to the motor plate which is 42" to rear axle CL ) both of these cars use almost the exact same setups and are both very quick. The third has a z link rear like a BEAST chassis. set up is also the same as the long 4 bar cars with the exception of rear spring rate due to the coil over being mounted to the lower arm and not directly to the birdcage. The rear arms are 14.5" CL-CL and the coil over is mounted 4.5" back. I come up with a motion ratio of 1.9 ( I round it up to 2 - 1 for ease of conversion ) This car is VERY quick and at times has been almost a second quicker then the rest of the field. Now...the last car. I built this one with a short 4 link ( 27.5" CL - CL ) this car has allways wanted to push coming off....actually more like lifts the front wheels under excelleration. I've gone up in rear split ( 50# more on the RR...I usually only run 25# split ) moved the top wing forward and put a bunch of rebound in the front shocks. This has made the car waaaaaaaaaaaay better, but allways near the end of the main, the car goes tight again.
Any thoughts ?

Thanks....Kenny
 
  • #62
Kenny
i been in chicago at trade show..btw..best show in years...
i have not heard back from my software guy yet on software..
ref car pushing at end of the race...

push or under steer means the car has too much rear weight and the front tires can not turn the car so it snow plows toward the wall, not good..
we know in order for the right front to work properly it needs enough weight transferred to it to stick...( take a front tire off the car and place it on the garage floor and stand it up like its on the car. now place eahc hand at the max diameter and slide it across the floor..pretty easy..right..now get the fat kid next door to come over and sit on the tire and try this again...putting fat boys extra 100 pounds on it makes the sliding more difficult..right--DOWN FORCE)

think about this...the fuel has been used and you have a lot less weight on the rear of the car...normally

this coupled with the fronts heating up, change in stagger, the wedge changes..all contribute to late race push..one thing you can do is switch to nitrogen in the tires..will cut out thermal growth and this will control wedge change to some degree..
 
  • Like
Likes supersheen
  • #63
Mike.....I do use Nitrogen in the tires. All tires grow exactly 2lbs
 
  • #64
One more thing Mike. All 4 cars run the front panhard bar uphill to the chassis 1/2". This is good for about 2 - 3 tenths on all 4 cars I tune.When I run the front bar level, the cars are all loose on initial turn in. Is this telling me that I am a little light on my front springs ? I run a 400 on the LF and a 425 on the RF. Should I level the front bar and put more spring in the front ? Keep the front springs the same, level the front panhard bar and lower the rear bar ?

Thanks...kenny
 
Last edited:
  • #65
Kenny.. just got home and dug up my old dirt track notes..

If my memory serves me correctly, and your talking about your roll center along your panard/j-bar axis, raising the roll center will minimize the roll. But, this will only work solely for roll center if your raise both ends of the panard/j-bar. If you only raising the chassis end, you're now introducing a percentage of bite in wheel loading depending on your rearend geometry. As for the left or right, that is dictated by the length of your bar in relation to the center of your chassis and weight distribution. The more you bring it closer to the center, the more you'll allow the chassis to roll.

Lowering the roll center will help the car roll over more which helps generate more side bite. The roll center is the axis of rotation for the car when the body rotates left to right. The lower you place the roll center, the longer the "torque arm" you are generating. Longer torque arm's give the chassis/body more leverage which produces more roll which makes the right side tires grip the track harder. The principal is the same as a torque wrench. The roll center on a torque wrench would be where the socket attaches. The torque arm would be the location you place your hand on the wrench. The point you position your hand around the wrench is where the force gets applied. The further you move your hand away from the socket(roll center) the longer the torque arm you produce. This helps multiply the force you are generating with your hand generating more leverage.
So back to the racecar...The weight of the chassis/body is the force that causes the car to roll. The chassis/body is the same thing as your hand turning a socket wrench.

Increasing the distance between the roll center (socket attachment point) and the center of mass of the chassis/body (where you stick your hand on the wrench handle) you create more roll (leverage) due to a large torque arm or lever arm.

The roll center is located between the two heims on your panhard bar. If you are using a J-bar it is in the center of the two heims as if the bar was straight. The more weight you put on the right side of the roll center the more it will allow the chassis to roll. This is why you use a j-bar or a shorty bar on a dirt car and a long bar on an asphault car. You want roll on dirt and not on asphault.

Raising the chassis mount on a long bar tightens up the car. It's from the increased angle on the bar.

i think you have stagger growing on right front..late race push comes from right front diameter growing due to heat..this is like running a stiffer right front spring, this means the front end is not accepting the same amount of weight transfer from left rear to right front going into the turn and at end of race you are keeping more weight on the rear springs ( rear springs are acting like softer springs) and the car starts to push. your " wedge" is changing.

as far as swapping out the front springs...and changing the attack angle of the bars...i would first start with trying to get a set up running same size springs and tune to that set up.
all cars are different but the trends are there and you found them..you obviously got the hot set up on the present angles and there is some weight jacking going on.

The handling balance for a Sprint Car needs to be a dynamic balance just as in a stock car. All four tires need to be in contact with the racing surface and have the most load ending up on them as possible. If we have a truly balanced setup, the LF tire will carry a decent load and the car will turn better.

For a winged Sprint Car, it would make sense that our spring rates, side to side, would be the same. Spring split on a solid axle suspension has a dramatic affect on roll tendencies. Since the cars roll first to the right on entry and then left at mid-turn due to the aero forces on the wing, we need to have the same roll stiffness in both directions. If a stiffer RR spring (over the LR spring) promotes roll stiffness in a roll to the right, then the reverse would be true for a roll to the left.
Our handling can be much different from corner entry to mid-turn if we run different rate springs on each side for winged Sprint Cars. The Panhard bar height, or Watt's link moment center height, must also be tuned to the spring stiffness as well as the spring base. The idea is to develop a setup for your Sprint Car that has the same roll characteristics for the front and rear of the chassis so that the handling balance is equal all of the way through the turns. Again, this has been tried and proven to work.

The setups for the winged Sprint Cars vs. wingless Sprint Cars is necessarily much different due to the high amount of downforce produced by the wings. The spring stiffness must be more for the winged cars, especially on asphalt. The speeds are much greater when Sprint Cars are racing on asphalt with wings attached.

More loading means more traction and the lateral g forces go up considerably with the increased speed through the turns. This necessitates a higher overall spring stiffness and in some cases, a spring split with the right side springs being more rate than the left sides.
Here too, we see a definite need for chassis setup balance. We really want all four tires to carry maximum load. At the LF, we need for that tire to carry load to help the car to turn. Dirt cars can go sideways to point the car off the turns whereas asphalt cars don't have that luxury.

Kenny all these set ups are band aids to deal with weight transfer that THIS SET UP has...any time you change a par setting you change degree of weight transferred and rate of transfer. hopefully my software guy will tell me Monday about the capability of using it on sprint car set ups..what we really have to do is find the front and rear roll centers and figure how to lower them in a practical manner and get as nuetral a set up as possible..then by tweaking the P-bars we can adjust to the changing track conditions..

these are from my track notes and may be rabbling but i am not a dirt tracker..and only helped a winged sprint car team one season..hope it helps
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Likes Sdurand76 and (deleted member)
  • #66
Mike.....I value all your input. I run 25 split across the front ( 25 more RF ) because I have found the car to " squirt " loose on initial corner entry with anything less. I have also found that almost every car has had better corner entry with the front panhard bar running uphill to the chassis 1/2 ". I have been running 25 - 50 rear spring split ( more spring on the RR ) for two reasons. I have tried it straight up as well as more LR spring. Both of which made the car push horribly coming off the later of the two being the worst. Also with less then 25 pound rear split the car wants to hike the LF coming off...my goal has been to keep the LF on the track, as I feel this has to help the car turn.
I guess what I would like to know is this...If I lower the panhard bar...either front or rear...do I have to go up in spring rate to control chassis roll ?
Ive also been thinking...I run a very low crank height in my cars...7". I am wondering if I might be able to help bite by running the motor a bit higher...lets say a 9" crank height. much like a dirt car.
Thanks...Kenny
 
  • #67
Kenny t he following messgae came from my software guy..


Mike,

Our Circle Track Analyzer DOES allow for straight axles on the front. However, it does not do all the detailed 3D analysis of the Susp Anzr. Click on Link below:

http://performancetrends.com/Circle_Track_Analyzer.htmIt won't do all the jazzy stuff the door slam software does but is well worth the dollars to see RC change when you change mounting points..
i swear by it for my late model and formula car!



Thanks.

Kevin Gertgen
Performance Trends
feedback@performancetrends.com
248-473-9230 fax 248-442-7750
 
Last edited:
  • #68
I was directed here but a friend, who reads here but never post, and I have spent the last 3 nights reading the info here and find all of it to be very informative, I have been in racing for over 30 years, as a driver mechanic and crew chief, this year I have been talked out of retirement, to work on a car racing in the heart of the south, on dirt tracks, this willl be my first venture in the 3link's, I have worked with the 4 links and torsion bars and leaf spring cars in the past, anyone got any pointers or links where I can cram on the 3 link? it is a full body 2800 lb car, tube chassis firewall back, stock clip on front, I feel I have a pretty good understanding of chassis' just have never worked with a 3 link before, been reading all I can find on the variations of the 3rd link, solid bar VS buscuit bar, and spring bar... looking for any input what so ever...thanks

the dr.
 
  • #69
Welcome, Dr. It is always great to meet a fellow racer. As you state, you will be running a stock arm front end ( metric) and 3 link rear. This is ok but most dirt guys run 4 link to hook up better. A three link can run ok and I recommend the two following books from Steve Smith Auotsports
I.M.C.A Modified Racing Technology by Steve Smith
PAved Track Stock Car Technology bu Steve Smith..it goes into a lot more physics
the IMCA book deals with metric frame economy modifieds using stock front suspension and both 3 and 4 link rear..AND IT IS HEAVY ON THE TRACK TUNING INFO.
Personally i would get several poster board sheets, tape them togeather , put it under the car and and note all front end mounting points. This will give you a base line record of exact suspension points and you can calculate the roll center height and location from this..and use it when you have to rebuild the front end..and we both know that happens more than we would like.
I attached print out from Performance Trend software
one is circle track analyzer and one is the more advanced suspension analyzer
I swear by this program as it let's you fiddle with mounting points and A-arm lengths to get a better roll center height and location
Dr. it depends on how much you want to win...most guys do monkey see monkey do at the track and never understand how the suspension works..they just bandaid a replicated suspension that everyone runs ( except for the track hot dog) and fiddle with stagger , wedge and maybe sway bar tuning...I believe in relocating the stock roll center and modifying the suspension into a best case situation under the handicap regulations you got to run...
but this is just my opinion
ps ifin you want to email your measurements, i can plug um into the program and send um back to you
 

Attachments

  • Suspension Analyzer.jpg
    Suspension Analyzer.jpg
    60.3 KB · Views: 1,656
  • Circle track  Analyzer.jpg
    Circle track Analyzer.jpg
    63.2 KB · Views: 1,696
Last edited:
  • #70
Thanks Ranger Mike, I understand exactly what your saying, about monkey see monkey do, I will share a story with you you will get a kick out of...
a couple years ago while running the local track we had won 7 out of 11 races and run second or 3rd in the rest of them, when one of our local drivers felt the need to help us into the wall, well we were able to repair all of the damage except for the right side header, which we were told by dyna-tech it would be 10 to 14 days before itwould arrive, so we dug around in the shop and found an old header to use for one race, only problem was it was an over the frame style not the under the frame style we had been running, no problem I mounted it and fabricated a shield and ran it out the side of the car ( where the passenger door should be) instead of under the car, well, it sure made the car sound different, since the header was pointing the exhaust right at the wall down the straights, causing a reverb effect, everyone thought I had broke out my "big " motor, and me being the sort of person I am, did nothing to dispell the rumor,well we won, so we take the car home, new header arrives and we put it on patch the hole in the door, and on the following saturday we go back to the trqack... 5 cars suddenly had headers running out the door! so yeah monkey see monkey do...
now back to the topic, a 4 link is out of the question since rules will not allow it thus the reason for us running the 3 link, I will be looking at the books you listed and checking out the sheets you provided, the car will be here the week of christmas, and I will be spending some time touching each and every bolt of it and getting to know it very well, and soon as I do I will be sending you the information.
I am glad I have found this site since with my reputation around here no one wants to share too much info...lol looking forward to reading more post and getting to know each of you, should any of you ever find yourselves in the NW Ga area please holler at me , we can do some bench racing and maybe vbenture over to the track... we got some good racing round here... my blog is listed in my profile and there is a link to my photo album there, please check it out and take a gander at my photo's I am proud of some of the shots I was able to get this year...

thanks again
the dr.
 
  • Like
Likes supersheen

Similar threads

  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
9
Views
6K
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Introductory Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
  • General Discussion
Replies
1
Views
8K
  • General Discussion
Replies
4
Views
7K
Replies
6
Views
3K
Back
Top