Exploring a Finite Universe: Understanding its Challenges

In summary, a finite universe is difficult to imagine because it is like thinking of the surface of a balloon being only 2D and you have to think of what would be the 3D analog of that. It is easier to imagine what it must have been like to live in a time before it was known that the Earth was round and that gravity kept us all from falling off the surface. After all, we can see that the surface extends to the horizon in all directions. If we walk towards the horizon then the limit of the horizon moves with us and we can see how the surface extends further. So surely there can be only two
  • #71
SpaceTiger said:
And he receives the meaning of those dots from "on high"? Come on, this is getting ridiculous.

It is getting ridiculous. I never intended to debate it in the first place.

SpaceTiger said:
You can't be serious...

This is my serious face...:yuck:

SpaceTiger said:
Nope, the number of free parameters in the finite models can be made to be the same as in the infinite ones.

How so?

SpaceTiger said:
There is no need for a boundary anymore than there is need for a creator. It's just a human concept being unnecessarily forced on the natural world.

Finite- Having bounds; limited + Universe- All matter and energy, including Earth, the galaxies and all therein, and the contents of intergalactic space, regarded as a whole. Obviously words cannot describe a finite universe because by definition it contradicts its self.

SpaceTiger said:
The plural was referring to theories of infinite universes -- "Infinite universes are commonplace in mainstream science". That means there are many mainstream theories of the universe that are infinite.

Ah, I see what your saying, sorry bout that.
 
Space news on Phys.org
  • #72
Balence said:
Finite- Having bounds; limited + Universe- All matter and energy, including Earth, the galaxies and all therein, and the contents of intergalactic space, regarded as a whole. Obviously words cannot describe a finite universe because by definition it contradicts its self.

Okay, it's obvious that there's no attempt at understanding here, so if you'd like to continue this line of "research", please do so in the independent research forum. Depending on how they're interpreted, your ideas are either non-scientific or just wrong, so further discussion does not belong here.
 

Similar threads

Replies
5
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
980
Replies
26
Views
2K
  • Cosmology
Replies
12
Views
1K
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
1K
Replies
70
Views
3K
Replies
7
Views
889
Back
Top