Does the Earth's movement towards the sun affect the speed of light?

In summary, the Michelson/Morley experiment was designed to detect the existence of "ether", the medium in which light was thought to be traveling. However, it found no difference in the speed of light as measured from two different points, leading to the conclusion that there was no such thing as ether. This was later explained by Einstein's theory of Special Relativity, which states that the speed of light is constant for all observers, regardless of their motion. Additionally, his 1911 theory showed that the local gravitational field can affect the speed of light, leading to the misconception that the speed of light is always "c" for all observers. However, this is only true for measurements taken at a local atomic clock, which is influenced
  • #1
Vosh
82
0
I thought the idea was that light should move faster coming towards the Earth than moving away but that it was found that the two speeds were the same; but isn't the Earth moving towards something adding to its rate just as the Earth moving away from something adds to the rate at which it is moving away? Clearly I am missing something. Many thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The Michelson/Morley experiment was supposed to detect the existence of "ether", the medium in which light was thought to be traveling. As the Earth moved through this ether we should have detected a difference in the speed of light as measured from two different points at the same time, because one place would be going with the flow of ether and one would be going against it. The experiment found no difference and therefore there was no such thing as ether. In a few years Einstein came along and stated that the speed of light is constant for all observers, which explained this rather offbeat result.
 
  • #3
Originally posted by Vosh
Clearly I am missing something.
Einstein's Special Relativity: the speed of light is constant for all observers regardless of inertial frame of reference. That means the speed of light is the same regardless of the motion of the objects. How? TIME is not constant. The rate of the passage of time differs for different observers and as a result, the speed of light they observe is the same.
 
  • #4
Originally posted by Vosh
I thought the idea was that light should move faster coming towards the Earth than moving away but that it was found that the two speeds were the same; but isn't the Earth moving towards something adding to its rate just as the Earth moving away from something adds to the rate at which it is moving away? Clearly I am missing something. Many thanks.

You are basically correct, but there are some other details you need to know. You are talking about relative light speed of c + v and c – v. You can see that in Chapter 9 of Einstein’s book, also in Section 2 of his 1905 paper.

What he deduced in 1911 is that atomic clocks slow down in a gravitational field just as the local speed of light does, so an atomic clock resting inside a gravitational field will always measure “c” as the local speed of light at that clock.

This often confused with the rumor that “the speed of light is always ‘c’ relative to all observers”. This is not quite true. When using atomic clocks resting inside a local gravitational field, they will measure ‘c’ for the local speed of light, at the clock, but, as he explained in the 1911 theory, if we use an outside clock that is not affected by the local gravitational field, then we can tell that light is speeding up a little and slowing down. All this information is contained in his 1911 theory.

Michelson and Morley thought the Earth was moving through a universe-stationary ether at about 18.6 mps. However, in the 1911 theory, Einstein deduced that the gravitational field of every astronomical body acts like a speed regulator. So, Michelson and Morley got a “null” result because their machine was resting inside the earth’s gravitational field, so the speed of light was the same, locally, no matter how they turned their machine.

There is no large universe-stationary ether. As far as I can tell from the Einstein theories, local gravitational fields seem to control the local speed of light.

So, when the Earth moves toward a distant star, we are moving toward its on-coming light beam at c + v, however, according to Einstein, that light beam slows down near the earth, when it reaches the influence of the earth’s gravitational field, and if we measure its speed with a local atomic clock, we will measure and calculate the local speed of “c”. So, once the c + v light photons get near the earth, they slow down to “c”, as measured by a local atomic clock at the place where their local speed is measured.
 
  • #5
Originally posted by Vosh
I thought the idea



http://66.102.7.104/search?q=cache:...ht+slows+down+physics+near+sun&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

This guy explains some of what I just said. The graph is from Einstein’s 1911 paper. dt = far away reference time, so that the far away clock won’t be influenced by the sun’s local gravitational field. c’dt is a faster part of a light wavefront, and cdt is a slower part. Thus the light beam experiences a gravitational refraction as Newton predicted in "Optics” in 1704. But atomic clocks resting at the point of c’dt and cdt would measure the local speed of “c”, since the clocks slow an appropriate amount, due to the gravitational potential at those points.
 
Last edited by a moderator:
1.

What is the Michelson Morley Experiment?

The Michelson Morley Experiment was a scientific experiment conducted in the late 19th century by Albert Michelson and Edward Morley. They aimed to measure the speed of light and determine if there was an aether, a hypothetical substance thought to be the medium through which light traveled.

2.

What were the results of the Michelson Morley Experiment?

The results of the experiment showed that the speed of light was constant in all directions, which contradicted the prevailing belief at the time that the speed of light was affected by the motion of the observer. This also suggested that there was no aether, and led to the development of Einstein's theory of relativity.

3.

Why is the Michelson Morley Experiment important?

The Michelson Morley Experiment was important because it provided evidence for the theory of relativity and challenged the existing understanding of the properties of light. It also paved the way for future experiments and discoveries in the field of physics.

4.

What is the significance of the null result in the Michelson Morley Experiment?

The null result of the experiment was significant because it showed that the speed of light was independent of the direction of the observer's motion. This was a groundbreaking discovery that led to a shift in scientific thinking and ultimately contributed to the development of modern physics.

5.

How does the Michelson Morley Experiment relate to the concept of aether?

The Michelson Morley Experiment disproved the existence of aether, which was a commonly accepted theory at the time. The null result of the experiment showed that light did not require a medium to travel through, and instead traveled at a constant speed in a vacuum. This challenged the traditional belief that aether was necessary for the propagation of light.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
2
Replies
47
Views
4K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
14
Views
2K
Replies
3
Views
340
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
9
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
20
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
5
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
15
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
4
Views
859
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
2
Views
566
Back
Top