Why Wave Functions Use Complex Exponentials vs Trigonometric Functions

In summary, the complex exponential function (e^{}ix) is used in Schrodinger's wave function because standard quantum mechanics requires a complex-valued wave function for the time evolution of a state vector. Using a real-valued function would not accurately predict future probabilities. Euler's formula shows the relationship between the complex exponential function and trigonometric functions. The probability amplitude must be a complex-valued function to allow for standing waves of constant magnitude in a potential well. Attempts to replace the complex wave function with a real-valued one have been unsuccessful.
  • #1
redtree
285
13
Why are wave functions, e.g., Schrodinger's, based on the complex exponential function (e[tex]^{}ix[/tex]) and not trigonometric functions (sine or cosine)?

See Euler's formula for their relationship: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_formula

Furthermore, by using the complex exponential function, the probability amplitude becomes a complex-valued function (a + bi). Were sine or cosine used, the probability amplitude of the wave function would not be a complex-valued function. Is there a reason that the probability amplitude should be a complex-valued function?
 
Last edited:
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
You need complex-valued wavefunctions so that you can have standing waves of constant magnitude over time (such as in a potential well). Real-valued functions would have to oscillate in magnitude.
 
  • #3
What do you mean by magnitude? Is it the same as amplitude?
 
  • #4
Nothing keeps you from using sine and cos. That what Euler's identity says.

The time evolution of a state vector/ wave function must conserve the norm of the state vector, and it always has to be one.

Note e[tex]^{it}[/tex] e[tex]^{it}[/tex]=1.
 
  • #5
redtree said:
Why are wave functions, e.g., Schrodinger's, based on the complex exponential function (e[tex]^{}ix[/tex]) and not trigonometric functions (sine or cosine)?

See Euler's formula for their relationship: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Euler's_formula

Furthermore, by using the complex exponential function, the probability amplitude becomes a complex-valued function (a + bi). Were sine or cosine used, the probability amplitude of the wave function would not be a complex-valued function. Is there a reason that the probability amplitude should be a complex-valued function?

My post https://www.physicsforums.com/showpost.php?p=1539835&postcount=20 and some other posts in that thread may be relevant.
 
  • #6
The simple answer is that standard quantum mechanics as we understand it requires a complex wavefunction [tex] \psi [/tex] defined on the configuration space. You can replace this with a function to [tex] \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} [/tex] and change the equations accordingly, since [tex] \mathbb{C} [/tex] and [tex] \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} [/tex] are isomorphic. But you can't replace [tex] \psi [/tex] with a function to just [tex] \mathbb{R} [/tex].

Also, Euler's formula doesn't turn a complex number into a real number. [tex] \cos \theta + i \sin \theta [/tex] is still a complex number, and the probability amplitude will still be a complex valued function.
 
  • #7
dx said:
The simple answer is that standard quantum mechanics as we understand it requires a complex wavefunction [tex] \psi [/tex] defined on the configuration space. You can replace this with a function to [tex] \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} [/tex] and change the equations accordingly, since [tex] \mathbb{C} [/tex] and [tex] \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} [/tex] are isomorphic. But you can't replace [tex] \psi [/tex] with a function to just [tex] \mathbb{R} [/tex].

What properties of standard quantum mechanics require a complex wavefunction?
 
  • #8
redtree said:
dx said:
The simple answer is that standard quantum mechanics as we understand it requires a complex wavefunction [tex] \psi [/tex] defined on the configuration space. You can replace this with a function to [tex] \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} [/tex] and change the equations accordingly, since [tex] \mathbb{C} [/tex] and [tex] \mathbb{R} \times \mathbb{R} [/tex] are isomorphic. But you can't replace [tex] \psi [/tex] with a function to just [tex] \mathbb{R} [/tex].QUOTE]


What properties of standard quantum mechanics require a complex wavefunction?

well the physics of spin 1/2 systems for example, see Sakurai - Modern Quantum Mechanics chapter 1
 
  • #9
redtree said:
What properties of standard quantum mechanics require a complex wavefunction?

That's like asking what property of Newtonian physics requires the mechanical state of a particle to be position and momentum. It is possible to construct a theory where the time evolution of a particle depends only on initial position, but that's not the way nature is. It just happens to be so that the mechanical state of a quantum system needed to predict future probabilities is a complex function.
 

1. Why do wave functions use complex exponentials instead of trigonometric functions?

The use of complex exponentials in wave functions is based on the mathematical theory of complex numbers. Complex numbers are a combination of real and imaginary numbers, and they offer a powerful tool for describing oscillatory and periodic phenomena, such as waves. Using complex exponentials allows for a more concise and elegant representation of wave functions compared to trigonometric functions.

2. What advantages do complex exponentials provide for wave functions?

Complex exponentials offer several advantages for describing wave functions. They can represent both real and imaginary components of a wave, providing a more complete and accurate description. They also simplify mathematical operations such as differentiation and integration, making it easier to solve complex wave equations.

3. Can trigonometric functions be used in place of complex exponentials in wave functions?

Yes, trigonometric functions can be used to represent wave functions, but they are not as efficient or accurate as complex exponentials. Trigonometric functions can only represent real components of a wave, while complex exponentials can represent both real and imaginary components. This makes complex exponentials a more suitable choice for describing complex wave phenomena.

4. How do complex exponentials relate to the physical properties of waves?

In quantum mechanics, wave functions using complex exponentials represent the probability amplitudes of particles in a quantum system. This means that the square of the amplitude corresponds to the probability of finding a particle in a specific location. The real and imaginary components of the complex exponentials also correspond to the position and momentum of the particle, respectively.

5. Are there any real-world applications that use complex exponentials in wave functions?

Complex exponentials are used extensively in many areas of science and engineering, such as electromagnetics, signal processing, and quantum mechanics. They are also the basis for the Fourier transform, which is used in fields such as image and sound processing. In quantum mechanics, complex exponentials are used to describe the behavior of particles at the subatomic level.

Similar threads

Replies
9
Views
688
Replies
3
Views
3K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
6
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
550
Replies
12
Views
2K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Calculus and Beyond Homework Help
Replies
7
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Quantum Physics
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
2
Views
571
Back
Top