Register to reply 
Conservation of energy in case of rotating falling rod 
Share this thread: 
#1
Nov112, 06:25 PM

P: 49

Suppose we have a rod standing vertically and then slightly disturbed so it begins to fall. After it falls through some height or angle assuming a clockwise rotational fall I can see that the left end is sliding on the surface ( for simplicity I'm ignoring friction ) horizontally. Here I assume that I know the change in height although knowing length of rod and angular displacement would work as well.
In that case, would I be right to say that the change in PE equals 1/2 I w^2 + 1/2 M v^2 For I , v and w at the Center of mass ? While that is normally the case for combined translation and rotation, I'm having doubts using that expression here as the leftmost end doesn't seem to rotate about the CM, it's sliding instead. Should I try to take the CM's source of torque ( the normal force on the leftmost point of contact ) and work from there to obtain some results ? 


#2
Nov112, 06:40 PM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,148

Hi Perpendicular!
(try using the X^{2} button just above the Reply box ) Keep calm and carry on! 


#3
Nov212, 04:25 AM

P: 49

well it is but I'm confused regarding what to do with the normal force N...supposing some angular movement theta I am thinking of expressing the torque due to N as some trigonometric function and then integrating over dtheta to get work done due to torque by normal force.
Then I think the eqn will look like (mgh) + (Work done due to the torque by normal force) = (Rotational energy from CM frame) + (KE w.r.t CM ) Am I right ? Or am I wrong in taking into account the work done by the normal force ? 


#4
Nov212, 05:05 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,148

Conservation of energy in case of rotating falling rod
Hi Perpendicular!
(only the friction force would do work, so only the friction force affects the energy equation) 


#5
Nov212, 05:14 AM

P: 49

The body rotates clockwise and the normal force applies a clockwise torque which must do some work over the angular displacement, right ? And from the CM frame, where else would you even get torque ?
after all work = torque.angular change as well. 


#6
Nov212, 05:40 AM

Sci Advisor
HW Helper
Thanks
P: 26,148

but … that's only using the component of the normal force that makes the torque you're ignoring the rest of the normal force (and it's very difficult to work out what that is!) please calculate work done from forces, not from torques!! 


#7
Nov212, 06:07 AM

P: 49

So basically one component of N does work while the other cancels that work out ?



Register to reply 
Related Discussions  
Calculation of conservation of energy of a magnet falling through a coil of wire.  General Physics  0  
Conservation of energy, speed before case hits spring  Introductory Physics Homework  5  
Conservation of mechanical energy (no friction)  doesn't work in this case?  Introductory Physics Homework  28  
Conservation of Energy for a rotating Rod  Introductory Physics Homework  4  
Falling rotating stick  Introductory Physics Homework  1 