M"Calculating Flywheel Force: Understanding the Two Flywheel Problem | CCM

  • Thread starter curiouschris
  • Start date
  • Tags
    Flywheel
In summary, the conversation discusses the calculation of the force on the axles of two spinning flywheels when they come into contact with each other. The force is affected by the torque and friction generated by the contact. The analogy of a disc brake and a spinning toy car is used to explain the concept, and the question of whether the radius of the flywheel affects the force on the axle is brought up.
  • #1
curiouschris
147
0
Hi all

First of all this is not a homework problem.

Say I have a flywheel of an arbitrary weight and diameter it is fixed in position with a vertical axis and spinning at oh I don't know 1000 revs per min.

Now I bring a second flywheel of the same size and weight which is not spinning at all into contact with the first.

Now my question is how do I calculate the force on the axles of either flywheel.

I am not sure this describes what I am looking for so I will use a clock face analogy to try and make it clearer.

You are looking down at the first flywheel (axle coming out of the screen) and it is spinning clockwise. twelve o'clock is at the top of the screen 6 o'clock at the bottom 3 to the right and 9 to the left.

If the second flywheel came into contact with the first flywheel at the first flywheels 3 o'clock position I imagine the axle of the first flywheel would attempt to move towards the 12 o'clock position, exactly opposite the tangent described at the 3 o'clock position.

With what force would the axle attempt to move? or more precisely how would I calculate that force?

Is that clearer or more muddy?

Please note: the only purpose of the second flywheel is to introduce friction, a rubber block would server the purpose equally well, I am only interested on the forces on the axle of the first flywheel. it just seemed easier to describe that way.

CC
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
The linear force on the axle of the first flywheel is the same regardless of the point of application of that force. The point of application of the force only affects the torque about the axis. If the rubber block is generating 10 lbs of force eastward, then there is a eastward 10 lbs of force applied to the axle. The torque would be equal to 10 lbs times the radius of the flywheel.
 
  • #3
Jeff Reid said:
The linear force on the axle of the first flywheel is the same regardless of the point of application of that force. The point of application of the force only affects the torque about the axis. If the rubber block is generating 10 lbs of force eastward, then there is a eastward 10 lbs of force applied to the axle. The torque would be equal to 10 lbs times the radius of the flywheel.

So neglecting the directional easterly pressure applied by the rubber block the only force on the axle is torque (twisting force).

In other words if I configured the rubber block like the pads in a disc brake, where the flywheel was squeezed equally between two rubber blocks. Then the only force that was 'felt' by the axle was the torque applied by the rapidly slowing flywheel.

Is that correct?

Why wouldn't the axle try to move in the opposite direction to the tangent at the point of contact with the blocks?

CC
 
  • #4
The force exerting the torque would be friction.
 
  • #5
The force exerting the torque would be friction.
Of course it would.

Perhaps a drawing may help people understand what I am looking for.

The "unknown force" is the force I am looking for a formula to calculate, I assume it would be an acceleration in the direction indicated.

Please take note the "braking force" is only applied at one point on the flywheels surface, as opposed to the whole surface of the flywheel.
 

Attachments

  • flywheel.png
    flywheel.png
    14.7 KB · Views: 532
  • #6
curiouschris said:
So neglecting the directional easterly pressure applied by the rubber block the only force on the axle is torque (twisting force).
It can't be ignored. You'd need 2 rubber blocks on opposite sides of the flywheel for the linear forces to cancel and end up with just a torque about the axle.

Why wouldn't the axle try to move in the opposite direction to the tangent at the point of contact with the blocks?
Blocks or block? If there are 2 blocks on opposite sides and they generate equal and opposite forces, then there is no net force on the axle, just a torque. Otherwise there is a linear force that can't be neglected.
 
  • #7
Jeff Reid said:
Blocks or block?
I did state two blocks, configured as in a disc brake like on a car. so yes two blocks, but not on opposite edges but on opposite sides of the flywheel. If you have seen how a car disc brake works then you'll understand.

See the diagram I uploaded in my previous post.
 
  • #8
The problem is analogous to spinning up the wheels of a toy car, and then placing the car on the tabletop. The car will accelerate forwards for a few moments while the rotational kinetic stored in the spinning wheels transfers to linear kinetic energy of the whole car (approaching an equilibrium velocity where no more energy transfer occurs, but that's not important here).

If you spin up the wheels again, but this time hold the car's wheels in contact with the tabletop instead of letting it accelerate, then we have a situation similar to your flywheel/brakes scenario. It seems to me that the initial force of friction (per wheel) of the wheels grinding against the tabletop must be equal and opposite to the "pulling" force on each axle (the forwards driving force exerted on the car by the spinning wheels). I only have a minute to finish writing, but at a glance it seems that this pulling force must be the same as the pulling force if you were not holding the car with your hand. Perhaps I've just gone round in a circle, but I find the car analogy easier to understand and the calculation shouldn't be difficult.
 
  • #9
Hi meta, excellent! that analogy works for me.

So then my question would be, does the radius of the tyre (or flywheel) come into play when calculating the force applied to the axle.

My logic says that if I have two tyres of different radius's but each having the same stored kinetic energy each size tyre will rotate a different amount based on its radius, thus the energy transfer to the axle would be different (per rotation) dependent on the radius of the tyre.

Given two tyres both storing the same kinetic energy the smaller tyre would have to rotate more to push the vehicle the same distance as the larger tyre.

I have answered my own question. Yes the radius does come into play.

Given that I could probably work out the formula I was looking for in my original post.CC
 
Last edited:

1. What is a flywheel and why is it important in scientific research?

A flywheel is a mechanical device that stores rotational energy and helps to maintain a constant speed in a machine. In scientific research, flywheels are used in experiments that require precise and consistent movement, such as testing the effects of gravity on objects or studying the motion of planets.

2. How is flywheel force calculated?

Flywheel force is calculated by multiplying the mass of the flywheel by the square of its rotational speed. This equation is known as the flywheel moment of inertia and is often denoted as I = mr², where m is the mass of the flywheel and r is the radius of rotation.

3. What is the Two Flywheel Problem and why is it important to understand?

The Two Flywheel Problem is a common phenomenon in which two flywheels connected by a shaft behave differently when rotating at different speeds. This problem is important to understand because it can affect the accuracy and precision of experiments that involve flywheels, and it is crucial to account for this discrepancy in data analysis.

4. How can the Two Flywheel Problem be solved?

The Two Flywheel Problem can be solved by using the concept of flywheel compensation. This involves adjusting the rotational speed of one flywheel to match the speed of the other flywheel, thus eliminating the discrepancy between the two. Additionally, using flywheels with similar moment of inertia can also help to reduce the effects of the Two Flywheel Problem.

5. Are there any real-world applications of the Two Flywheel Problem?

Yes, there are many real-world applications of the Two Flywheel Problem. For example, it can affect the performance of flywheel-based energy storage systems, such as those used in hybrid vehicles. It can also impact the accuracy of gyroscopes used in navigation and aerospace industries. Understanding and accounting for the Two Flywheel Problem is crucial in these applications to ensure reliable and accurate results.

Similar threads

Replies
8
Views
1K
  • Other Physics Topics
2
Replies
39
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
988
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
18
Views
6K
Replies
6
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
2
Replies
49
Views
2K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Engineering and Comp Sci Homework Help
Replies
10
Views
4K
  • Mechanical Engineering
2
Replies
35
Views
3K
Back
Top