Exploring the Nature of Neutrinos: Dirac vs Majorana

In summary, the conversation discusses the nature of neutrinos and the difference between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos. It is established that if a neutrino is Dirac in nature, there are 6 possible internal states and if it is Majorana, there are only 6 total states. The discussion also touches on the possibility of right-handed neutrinos being sterile, the seesaw mechanism, and the effect of neutrino masses on decoupling. It is concluded that the Majorana mass term relates active states with active states and is the result of a high energy completion of the Standard Model.
  • #1
Matterwave
Science Advisor
Gold Member
3,971
328
Hi, I recently attended several lectures on the topic of neutrino astrophysics. I wanted to verify some of the fact that I gleaned for them, specifically about the Dirac vs Majorana nature of neutrinos.

1) The most basic fact first. If a neutrino is Dirac in nature, then it has 3 flavors, and 2 spin states (helicity states), for a total of 6 possible internal states. In addition, the anti-neutrino has 6 possible internal states. In total, there are 12 possible states. If a neutrino is Majorana in nature then anti-neutrinos are simply the right handed helicity states and regular neutrinos are the left handed helicity states, and so there are only 6 total possible states instead of 12. Is this true?

2) If fact 1 is true, then this is the "deduced fact" that I have gleaned from the talks. Given that the statistical weights attributed to neutrinos are 6 and not 12 (in, for example, neutrino decoupling calculations), is it therefore true then that either neutrinos are Majorana in nature, or, if they are Dirac in nature, then the right handed Dirac states are sterile states (6 sterile states)? This would be due to the left handed nature of the weak interactions?

3) If both fact 1 and 2 are true, then I have a follow up question. If neutrinos are Dirac in nature, what does it mean, since they are massive, for the right handed states to be sterile? Since right handedness and left handedness, helicity, is only a Lorentz invariant for massless particles (Weyl fermions), then there are some particles (Lorentz frames) which will "see" a right handed neutrino as a left handed one. In that case, what does it mean for the right handed neutrino to be sterile?

4) An additional follow up question. If neutrinos are Majorana in nature, then the anti-neutrinos are right handed helicity states. In that case, if the right handed Dirac neutrinos are sterile, then why are not the Majorana anti-neutrinos sterile since they are right handed?

Thanks.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
Matterwave said:
Hi, I recently attended several lectures on the topic of neutrino astrophysics. I wanted to verify some of the fact that I gleaned for them, specifically about the Dirac vs Majorana nature of neutrinos.

Just out of curiosity: Was this a summer school? If so, which and who was giving the lectures?

Matterwave said:
1) The most basic fact first. If a neutrino is Dirac in nature, then it has 3 flavors, and 2 spin states (helicity states), for a total of 6 possible internal states. In addition, the anti-neutrino has 6 possible internal states. In total, there are 12 possible states. If a neutrino is Majorana in nature then anti-neutrinos are simply the right handed helicity states and regular neutrinos are the left handed helicity states, and so there are only 6 total possible states instead of 12. Is this true?

Correct.

I would here like to stress that if you do add the right-handed neutrinos, they are SM singlets and nothing is stopping you from giving them a Majorana mass of their own. This is the basics behind the (type-I) seesaw mechanism, where you end up with three light active Majorana neutrinos and three heavy Majorana states which are mainly sterile.

Matterwave said:
2) If fact 1 is true, then this is the "deduced fact" that I have gleaned from the talks. Given that the statistical weights attributed to neutrinos are 6 and not 12 (in, for example, neutrino decoupling calculations), is it therefore true then that either neutrinos are Majorana in nature, or, if they are Dirac in nature, then the right handed Dirac states are sterile states (6 sterile states)? This would be due to the left handed nature of the weak interactions?

If you are considering the cosmological situation of decoupling, neutrino masses will typically be too small to have any effect (the helicity flip would occur on time-scales longer than the decoupling time). The right-handed states of Dirac neutrinos should therefore not enter into these since they are sterile. Indeed this is due to the left-handed nature of weak interactions (and the fact that the RH states also have no other interactions).

Matterwave said:
3) If both fact 1 and 2 are true, then I have a follow up question. If neutrinos are Dirac in nature, what does it mean, since they are massive, for the right handed states to be sterile? Since right handedness and left handedness, helicity, is only a Lorentz invariant for massless particles (Weyl fermions), then there are some particles (Lorentz frames) which will "see" a right handed neutrino as a left handed one. In that case, what does it mean for the right handed neutrino to be sterile?

Essentially that you would typically need a mass insertion to create the right-handed neutrino - and neutrino masses are very very small.

Matterwave said:
4) An additional follow up question. If neutrinos are Majorana in nature, then the anti-neutrinos are right handed helicity states. In that case, if the right handed Dirac neutrinos are sterile, then why are not the Majorana anti-neutrinos sterile since they are right handed?

Because electroweak interactions couple to left-handed particles and right-handed anti-particles. Or in other terms, the right-handed anti-neutrino is part of the SU(2) doublet
$$
L = \left(\begin{array}{c} \nu_L \\ \ell_L \end{array}\right),
$$
which is what couples to the W. The Majorana mass term is of the form
$$
\overline{\nu_L^c} \nu_L + {\rm h.c.}
$$
and thus relates active states with active states.

Note: The Majorana mass term as it stands breaks SU(2) invariance so it should not just be introduced as it is but as the result of some high energy completion of the SM. The lowest order effective operator with SM fields is then the Weinberg operator, which after EW symmetry breaking gives exactly a Majorana mass term of the form above.
 
  • #3
r
The most basic fact first. If a neutrino is Dirac in nature, then it has 3 flavors, and 2 spin states (helicity states), for a total of 6 possible internal states. In addition, the anti-neutrino has 6 possible internal states. In total, there are 12 possible states. If a neutrino is Majorana in nature then anti-neutrinos are simply the right handed helicity states and regular neutrinos are the left handed helicity states, and so there are only 6 total possible states instead of 12. Is this true?

The Number of degrees of freedom (D.O.F) doesn't depend on whether the neutrinos are Majorana or Dirac. It depends on if you include/consider right handed neutrinos. Left handed neutrinos(which are the neutrinos we have observed) have 3*2=6 D.O.F and with right handed neutrinos is goes up to 12.

From now on I'm including right handed neutrinos.
If neutrinos are Majorana, then you will have 6 neutrinos, each one with 2 spin states. 3 of them will be the light neutrinos that we know while the other 3 are presumably much heavier.

If fact 1 is true, then this is the "deduced fact" that I have gleaned from the talks. Given that the statistical weights attributed to neutrinos are 6 and not 12

In cosmological calculation, only the 3 neutrinos we have observed put in, so 6 D.O.F.
The presumed right handed are expected to be much heavier and with very small coupling to other matter. (They might have never been in thermal equilibrium)

If both fact 1 and 2 are true, then I have a follow up question. If neutrinos are Dirac in nature, what does it mean, since they are massive, for the right handed states to be sterile? Since right handedness and left handedness, helicity, is only a Lorentz invariant for massless particles (Weyl fermions), then there are some particles (Lorentz frames) which will "see" a right handed neutrino as a left handed one. In that case, what does it mean for the right handed neutrino to be sterile?

Here there is a distinction between chirality and helicity. Only the left handed chirality will have a coupling to the gauge bosons ( Z and W). Since the neutrino is massive sometimes a weak process will produce a neutrino which has right handed helicity in the lab frame. But as long as the neutrino is very relativistic, the fraction of these events will be suppressed.
An additional follow up question. If neutrinos are Majorana in nature, then the anti-neutrinos are right handed helicity states

If neutrinos are Majorana, they have no distinct antiparticles. simply 6 neutrinos, each one with two helicity states, three approximately active, three approximately sterile ( yet to be found)
 
  • #4
ofirg said:
From now on I'm including right handed neutrinos.
If neutrinos are Majorana, then you will have 6 neutrinos, each one with 2 spin states. 3 of them will be the light neutrinos that we know while the other 3 are presumably much heavier.

This is an assumption which is common but not at all necessary. The right-handed Majorana mass can be essentially anything (there are some experimental constraints ruling out the range where this mass is similar to the Dirac mass from the Yukawas, but it may be above or below this range). With a very low or zero RH Majorana mass we get (pseudo) Dirac neutrinos, with a heavier RH Majorana mass we can get anything from canonical type-I seesaw to light sterile neutrinos. The phenomenology is very rich and just assuming that the RH mass is very large is not highly motivated.

ofirg said:
In cosmological calculation, only the 3 neutrinos we have observed put in, so 6 D.O.F.
The presumed right handed are expected to be much heavier and with very small coupling to other matter. (They might have never been in thermal equilibrium)

Sterile neutrinos are actively being considered as a source of additional radiation degrees of freedom in the early Universe. If the RH mass is very large, then the Yukawas are typically also large in order to reproduce the light neutrino masses through the seesaw, which means the heavy neutrinos will be produced through these, which in most cases will put them in thermal equilibrium unless the reheating temperature is lower than their mass. At some point the temperature will fall and the heavy neutrinos may decay out of equilibrium - this is the basic mechanism behind leptogenesis.

ofirg said:
If neutrinos are Majorana, they have no distinct antiparticles. simply 6 neutrinos, each one with two helicity states, three approximately active, three approximately sterile ( yet to be found)

It should be mentioned that the additional sterile states do not need to exist to provide Majorana masses. Majorana masses may also be produced by any other high energy completion that provides the Weinberg operator when integrating out the heavy degrees of freedom. The prime example of this is the type-II seesaw mechanism, which introduces an additional SU(2) triplet scalar instead of singlet fermions.
 
  • #5
Thanks for the answers. Cleared this up for me. :)
 

1. What are Dirac and Majorana neutrinos?

Dirac and Majorana neutrinos are two types of neutrinos, which are subatomic particles that have no charge and interact very weakly with matter. They are both considered as fundamental particles in the Standard Model of particle physics, but they have different properties.

2. What is the main difference between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos?

The main difference between Dirac and Majorana neutrinos is their intrinsic spin. Dirac neutrinos have half-integer spin, while Majorana neutrinos have integer spin. This difference in spin also leads to differences in their interactions and behavior.

3. Are Dirac and Majorana neutrinos distinguishable in experiments?

No, Dirac and Majorana neutrinos cannot be distinguished in experiments. This is because they have the same mass and charge, and their interactions with matter are very similar. This makes it difficult to determine which type of neutrino is being detected in experiments.

4. How were Dirac and Majorana neutrinos first proposed?

Dirac neutrinos were first proposed by physicist Paul Dirac in the 1930s, while Majorana neutrinos were first proposed by physicist Ettore Majorana in the 1930s as well. Both scientists were trying to explain the existence of neutrinos and their properties within the framework of the Standard Model.

5. Which type of neutrino is more widely accepted in the scientific community?

Both Dirac and Majorana neutrinos are widely accepted in the scientific community. However, Dirac neutrinos are the more commonly accepted type, as they fit better with the predictions of the Standard Model and have been observed in various experiments. Majorana neutrinos are still being studied and their existence is still a subject of debate among scientists.

Similar threads

  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
13
Views
2K
  • New Member Introductions
Replies
1
Views
26
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
7
Views
5K
Replies
1
Views
2K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • High Energy, Nuclear, Particle Physics
Replies
18
Views
4K
  • Beyond the Standard Models
Replies
1
Views
2K
Back
Top