| New Reply |
Field Extensions and Root Fields |
Share Thread | Thread Tools |
| Aug9-12, 09:56 PM | #1 |
|
|
Field Extensions and Root Fields
I have a quick question. How does the following look?
Proposition: Every extension of degree 2 is a root field. Proof: Let F be a field. Let p(x) ε F[x] and suppose p(x) has degree n. Then p(x) has n roots, say c1,c2,...,cn. Let E be the extension of F that contains the aforementioned roots, and suppose [E:F]=2. Now, we know F(c1,c2,...,cn) is the root field of p(x) over F. Previously, we have shown that if an extension over a field is of a degree that is prime, then there is no proper field between the field and its extension*. The extension E clearly contains F, and by our hypothesis c1,c2,...,cnε E. Thus, F(c1,c2,...,cn) is subset of E. Then since, F(c1,c2,...,cn) ≠ F, F(c1,c2,...,cn) = E. Hence, our extension is indeed a root field. QED *I simply used the theorem that is analogous to LaGrange's Theorem for Finite Groups, but for fields! Now, this is my "second version" of the proof. I am going back and trying to prove a few exercises different way. I am not sure if I set up my assumptions correctly. Any criticism would be very helpful! Thanks! :) |
| Aug10-12, 07:51 PM | #2 |
|
|
No, that's not correct.
Here, you basically assume the existence of a polynomial whose roots are in E. You can't do that. What you have to do is assume that [E:F]=2 and actually prove that there's a polynomial whose roots are in E and that make E into a root field. |
| Aug11-12, 11:10 AM | #3 |
|
|
I knew something was dodgy about my assumptions. I just took another look at it. Here is an outline of how I want to prove it. (Before I write up the proof nicely, I usually write my solution line by line to make sure I have not made any unjustified statement.)
Every extension of degree 2 is a root field. Proof: Let F be a field, and let E be an extension such that [E:F]=2. 1. Let {a,b} be our basis for E. 2. By defintion of a basis, every element of E can be written as a linear combination of {a,b} with coefficients in F. 3. Then F(a,b) is clearly a subset of E. But, if we let x ε E, then x is some linear combination of {a,b}. Hence, x ε F(a,b). [This statement may not be needed] 4. Thus, E=F(a,b) 5. Since E is a finite extention, every element in E is algebraic over F. 6. Let p(x) be the polynomial who roots are a, b. (i.e. p(x)=(x-a)(x-b)) 7. Then, E is a root field for p(x) over F. QED Thank you for all the help! :) |
| Aug11-12, 11:15 AM | #4 |
|
|
Field Extensions and Root FieldsFor example, [itex][\mathbb{C},\mathbb{R}]=2[/itex]. We can take a=i and b=1. Then [itex]p(x)=(x-1)(x-i)=x^2-(1+i)x+i[/itex] does not have its coefficients in [itex]\mathbb{R}[/itex]. |
| Aug11-12, 11:25 AM | #5 |
|
|
Hmmm...That's right.. (x-a)(x-b)ε E[x]. Just how (x+i)(x-i)ε C[x].
Maybe I said too much in Line 6. Would be suffice to just say that p(x) ε F[x] whose roots are a and b is the polynomial that E is the root field for over F? |
| Aug11-12, 11:31 AM | #6 |
|
|
You're right that for [itex][\mathbb{C}:\mathbb{R}][/itex], that you have to take (x+i)(x-i). Can you generalize this? |
| Aug11-12, 02:02 PM | #7 |
|
|
I had never heard of a root field until I read this post. When I learned ring theory, we referred to them as splitting fields
![]() ...I miss algebra. |
| Aug11-12, 02:04 PM | #8 |
|
|
|
| New Reply |
| Thread Tools | |
Similar Threads for: Field Extensions and Root Fields
|
||||
| Thread | Forum | Replies | ||
| Field extensions, proving an element is in a field | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 13 | ||
| Field Extensions of Q | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 0 | ||
| Field Extensions | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 26 | ||
| [SOLVED] extensions fields | Calculus & Beyond Homework | 32 | ||
| Field extensions | Linear & Abstract Algebra | 5 | ||