New Reply

Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign

 
Share Thread Thread Tools
Jun24-12, 08:41 AM   #1
 

Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign


Hello, I'm trying to figure out what hypothesis I need to swap the Re{} (or Im) operator and the integral sign, but I can't find anything on the matter. I guess either it's a trivial question or a rare one. Can someone help me?

Thanks in advance.
PhysOrg.com
PhysOrg
science news on PhysOrg.com

>> Ants and carnivorous plants conspire for mutualistic feeding
>> Forecast for Titan: Wild weather could be ahead
>> Researchers stitch defects into the world's thinnest semiconductor
Jun24-12, 08:44 AM   #2
 
is the dummy variable real or complex?
Jun24-12, 04:13 PM   #3
 
Recognitions:
Gold Membership Gold Member
Science Advisor Science Advisor
Retired Staff Staff Emeritus
If your complex function is f(t)+ g(t)i where t is a real variable, and the integral is, say, [itex]\int Re(f)dt= \int f(t)dt[/itex], then, yes, that is the same as [itex]Re \int f(t)+ g(t)i dt[/itex] because that last integer is [itex]\int f(t)dt+ i\int g(t)dt[/itex].

If, however, f is a complex function of a complex variable that is not necessarily true.
Jun25-12, 02:59 PM   #4
 

Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign


thanks a lot!
New Reply
Thread Tools


Similar Threads for: Re{} and Im{} operators under the integral sign
Thread Forum Replies
Sign Convention For Momentum Operators Quantum Physics 4
Differentiation under the Integral Sign Calculus & Beyond Homework 1
Integral sign in Latex Math & Science Software 1
The sign of the integral Calculus & Beyond Homework 7
Differentiation under the integral sign Calculus 4