Restrictions on Riemann components

In summary, spacetime curvature is described by the way the components of the Riemann tensor vary from point to point in spacetime, that such variation is controlled by Einstein's field equations, and that the source of curvature is the energy-momentum tensor together with a possible cosmological constant.
  • #1
oldman
633
5
My crude understanding of GR in outline is that spacetime curvature is described by the way the components of the Riemann tensor vary from point to point in spacetime, that such variation is controlled by Einstein's field equations, and that the source of curvature is the energy-momentum tensor together with a possible cosmological constant.

In some respects this outline has vague similarities to a description of how a solid deforms elastically in response to stress. In linear elasticity strains are described by the variation of strain tensor components, controlled by a tensor form of Hooke's law, and sourced by the stress tensor.

Now in the case of a strained solid there are "extra" restrictions on how the components of the strain tensor may vary from point to point. They must do so in a way that does not cause one element of matter to be displaced into a region already occupied by another element --- no matter overlap is allowed -- and also in such a way that holes do not open up in the solid. These are the so-called "conditions of compatibility"

Might there be different but nevertheless similarly "extra" restrictions on the variation of Riemann components in the case of GR?

For instance, for the microscopic laws of physics to be invariant under translations, as we find them, might one require that curved space-(time) sections remain isotropic (on a small enough scale) under translations?

If this were the case one might expect the concomitant spacetime transformations to be conformal, hence arriving at a modified form of SR and GR, eg. de Sitter relativity. Any comments?
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
It sounds like you may be looking for the bianchi identities? See for example http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node12.html
 
Last edited by a moderator:
  • #3
pervect said:
It sounds like you may be looking for the bianchi identities? See for example http://www.mth.uct.ac.za/omei/gr/chap6/node12.html [Broken]

Thanks for the suggestion that the Bianchi identities might be the sort of condition I’m looking for. And thanks for the UCT reference.

But I don’t think the identities have anything to do with a requirement that transformations in GR should be angle and shape preserving on a local scale, that is to say should be conformal transformations. As far as I’m aware the Bianchi identities guided Einstein in formulating his tensor, and are involved with conservation of momentum and energy – importantly enough --- but they don’t look like the conditions I had in mind.

These (if such exist) should bear on the question of why there is a need to extend Einsteinian relativity to de Sitter relativity, as proposed recently by Aldrovandi and Pereira in http://arxiv.org/abs/0711.2274 (If their proposal has the considerable merit I think it has).
 
Last edited by a moderator:

What are "Restrictions on Riemann components"?

"Restrictions on Riemann components" refer to a set of conditions that must be met in order for a manifold to be considered a Riemannian manifold. These conditions involve the curvature tensor and metric tensor of the manifold.

Why are restrictions placed on Riemann components?

Restrictions are placed on Riemann components to ensure that the manifold is a valid Riemannian manifold, meaning it has a well-defined metric and curvature tensor. This is important for studying the geometric properties of the manifold and for applications in physics and engineering.

What are some common restrictions on Riemann components?

Some common restrictions include the symmetry of the curvature tensor, the positive definiteness of the metric tensor, and the compatibility between the curvature and metric tensors.

What happens if the restrictions on Riemann components are not met?

If the restrictions on Riemann components are not met, the manifold may not have a well-defined metric or curvature tensor, which can lead to inconsistencies and contradictions in mathematical and physical models. It may also not have the expected geometric properties of a Riemannian manifold.

Are there any exceptions to the restrictions on Riemann components?

Yes, there are exceptions to the restrictions on Riemann components, such as in cases where the manifold has a degenerate metric or if it has a non-zero torsion tensor. In these cases, the manifold may still exhibit some Riemannian properties, but it may not be considered a strict Riemannian manifold.

Similar threads

  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
27
Views
3K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
10
Views
1K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
512
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
7
Views
1K
Replies
14
Views
5K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
21
Views
2K
  • Special and General Relativity
Replies
1
Views
1K
Replies
16
Views
7K
Back
Top