Planck's formula for Blackbody Radiation

In summary, the factor of 1/4 comes from the fact that the radiation going through the hole comes from every direction, and thus, it needs to be multiplied by cos^2.
  • #1
raghav
15
0

Homework Statement


Suppose that a blackbody spectrum is specified by Spectral Radiancy [tex]R_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/tex] and Energy Density [tex]\rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/tex] then show that
[tex]R_{T} (\nu) d\nu = \frac {c}{4}\cdot \rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/tex]


Homework Equations



[tex]\rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu = \frac{8 \pi h \nu^{3} d\nu}{c^{3}(e^{\frac{h\nu}{kT}}-1)}[/tex]

The Attempt at a Solution


 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
What do you know about spectral radiancy for a blackbody? What have you tried?
 
  • #3
What do you know about spectral radiancy for a blackbody? What have you tried?
Spectral Radiancy [tex]R(\nu)[/tex] is defined such that [tex]R_{T}(\nu)d\nu [/tex] gives the energy absorbed per unit area per unit time when radiation has frequency between [tex]\nu[/tex] and [tex]\nu + d\nu[/tex]. It is essentially power
 
  • #4
Can someone please help me out with this one?
Thanks in advance.
 
  • #5
If you integrate [itex]R_{T}(\nu)d\nu[/itex] over all possible frequencies you should get the total radiated power per unit area:

[tex]\Rightarrow \int_0^{\infty} R_{T}(\nu)d\nu=\sigma T ^4[/tex]

What quantity do you get when you integrate [itex]\rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/itex] over all possible frequencies?
 
  • #6
What quantity do you get when you integrate over all possible frequencies?

Since the latter quantity denotes energy density, the integral over all frequencies should give us total radiant energy contained in the cavity, which is [tex]kT[/tex] if we assume that [tex]T[/tex] is the absolute temperatre of the cavity.
Am I right sir?
 
  • #7
No, the total radiated energy will not be kT; try carrying out the integration with the expression you provided for the energy density.
 
  • #8
hmm yes sir I did that, and got something like this:
[tex] \frac{8(kT)^{4}\pi^{5}}{(hc)^{3}\cdot 15} [/tex]

Ok so now in order that i prove my problem All i do is to divide Stefan's Law by the above right? keeping of course in mind stefans constant in terms of [tex] h, c , k[/tex].
Is the relation true only between the integrals over [tex] 0 to \infty [\tex] or is it to even for spectral Radiancy?
 
Last edited:
  • #9
I fail to understand why that sentence of mine is appearing latexified :frown:
 
  • #10
raghav said:
I fail to understand why that sentence of mine is appearing latexified :frown:

backslash instead of forward slash?
 
  • #11
oh ok sir
 
  • #12
raghav said:
hmm yes sir I did that, and got something like this:
[tex] \frac{8(kT)^{4}\pi^{5}}{(hc)^{3}\cdot 15} [/tex]

Ok so now in order that i prove my problem All i do is to divide Stefan's Law by the above right? keeping of course in mind stefans constant in terms of [tex] h, c , k[/tex].
Is the relation true only between the integrals over [tex] 0 to \infty [/tex] or is it to even for spectral Radiancy?

Substitute

[tex]\sigma= \frac{2 \pi ^5 k^4}{15h^3c^2}[/tex]

into the expression, and notice that you get:

[tex]\int_0^{\infty} \rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu=\frac{4 \sigma T^4}{c}[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow \sigma T^4=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{c}{4} \rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/tex]

What does that mean [itex]R_{T}(\nu)d\nu[/itex] is?
 
  • #13
Hence it means that [tex]R_{T}(\nu}d\nu [/tex] is the power absorbed, per unit area by radiation with frequency lying in [tex]\nu[/tex] and [tex]\nu + d\nu[/tex] . But I don't quite get the physical interpretation of the result. Do you mind throwing some light on that sir?
 
  • #14
Actually. you already knew that [itex]R_{T}(\nu)d\nu[/itex] was the power radiated per unit area between [itex]\nu[/itex] and [itex]nu +dnu[/itex]. You used that to show that

[tex]\int_0^{\infty} R_{T}(\nu)d\nu=\sigma T ^4[/tex]

You then used your expression for the energy density to show

[tex]\sigma T^4=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{c}{4} \rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/tex]

Putting the two together you get:

[tex]\Rightarrow \int_0^{\infty} R_{T}(\nu)d\nu=\int_0^{\infty} \frac{c}{4} \rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/tex]

[tex]\Rightarrow R_{T}(\nu)d\nu=\frac{c}{4} \rho_{T} (\nu) d\nu[/tex]

doesn't it?

The physical interpretation of this result is that the radiated power is proportional to the energy density.
 
  • #15
An old thread, but hope this posting will give something to anyone confused on this topic and ended up here (just like me).

I tried to derive this on my own but didn't get the factor 1/4. I got the proportionality value only c, which I thought physically sensible because the energy inside the cavity of a blackbody was carried away by EM waves whose speed is c. But my answer was not in agreement with the book I was reading, c/4.

After searching for sometime, I finally found this:
http://hyperphysics.phy-astr.gsu.edu/hbase/quantum/rayj.html#c5

the factor of 1/4 was there because of two facts. Roughly, the two factors are:
1. in thermal equilibrium, the radiated power is the same as the absorbed power. This account for 1/2 if we are going to calculate only the radiated power.
2. the radiation going through the hole comes from every direction, and thus, it needs to be multiplied by cos^2 (comes from dot products of area and velocity of radiation A.v) which then averaged and account for another 1/2

Hope this help anyone who ended-up here when searching the meaning for the factor 1/4.
 

What is Planck's formula for Blackbody Radiation?

Planck's formula for Blackbody Radiation is a mathematical equation developed by physicist Max Planck in 1900. It describes the spectral energy density of electromagnetic radiation emitted by a blackbody (an idealized object that absorbs all incident radiation) at a given temperature.

What is a blackbody?

A blackbody is an idealized object that absorbs all incident radiation and emits thermal radiation at all wavelengths based on its temperature. It is used as a theoretical model for objects that absorb and emit radiation, such as stars and planets.

What is the significance of Planck's formula?

Planck's formula is significant because it accurately describes the spectral energy density of blackbody radiation, which had been a long-standing problem in physics. It also laid the foundation for quantum theory and helped to explain the properties of atoms and molecules.

How is Planck's formula used in modern science?

Planck's formula is used in a variety of fields, including astrophysics, cosmology, and thermodynamics. It is also used in the development of new technologies, such as infrared cameras and sensors, as well as in the study of the cosmic microwave background radiation.

Are there any limitations to Planck's formula?

While Planck's formula is accurate for blackbody radiation, it has limitations when applied to real-world objects. It assumes that the blackbody is in thermal equilibrium and that the emission and absorption of radiation are instantaneous, which may not always be the case. Additionally, it does not take into account the effects of relativity or quantum mechanics.

Similar threads

  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
906
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
3
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
2
Views
2K
Replies
1
Views
3K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
11
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
15
Views
2K
  • Advanced Physics Homework Help
Replies
1
Views
1K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
4
Views
2K
Back
Top