A new point of view on freezing point.

In summary, the presence of impurity particles in water allows heterogeneous nucleation to occur, resulting in a freezing point of 0oC. The amount of impurities present may determine the exact temperature at which water will freeze between -40oC and 0oC. The freezing point can also be defined as the temperature at which the Gibbs free energy of the liquid and solid phases are equal, with the melting point being a byproduct of this and kinetic theory. The melting and freezing points are the same due to the ease of nucleation for melting compared to the energy barrier for freezing. Both values are determined by the equivalence of energies for the two phases, specifically the Gibbs free energy.
  • #1
kelvin490
Gold Member
228
3
It is very hard to have homogeneous nucleation in common situation. Pure water with no nuclei at all will not freeze above -40oC. The presence of impurity particles allow the so-called heterogeneous nucleation to occur so that we can see water freeze at 0oC. It may be reasonable to guess at what temperature between -40oC and 0oC will water freeze depends on the amount of impurities in water. But we never see water freeze above 0oC at atmospheric pressure. Can the freezing point be defined in the following way? Freezing point is the temperature at which further increase of impurities cannot increase the temperature for the substance to freeze.
 
Physics news on Phys.org
  • #2
This point (which also corresponds to the melting point) is already defined as the temperature at which the Gibbs free energy of each phase, liquid and solid, is equal. Your definition is a byproduct of this and kinetic theory.
 
  • #3
Mapes said:
This point (which also corresponds to the melting point) is already defined as the temperature at which the Gibbs free energy of each phase, liquid and solid, is equal. Your definition is a byproduct of this and kinetic theory.

Thanks.But why the melting point coincides with the "maximum" freezing point?
 
  • #4
Melting and freezing are, of course, two sides of the same coin: a phase transition. Liquids can be supercooled because of the energy barrier associated with nucleating the first bit of solid, as you know; sometimes cooling is necessary to provide the driving force for nucleation.

In contrast, the melting point is relatively constant because there's little or no activation energy involved with melting; nucleation occurs with ease. (An equivalent way of saying this is that for all or nearly all materials, the liquid phase wets the solid phase, so it's not necessary to nucleate a tiny droplet.)

So the melting point and the freezing point are the same, given that there are plenty of nucleation sites for the freezing case, and both values are set by the equivalence of energies for the two phases. Since we're assuming constant temperature and pressure, the energy is specifically the Gibbs free energy.
 

1. What is the significance of a new point of view on freezing point?

A new point of view on freezing point allows scientists to gain a deeper understanding of the physical and chemical properties of different substances. It can also lead to the development of new methods for studying and controlling the freezing process.

2. How does a new point of view on freezing point differ from traditional theories?

A new point of view on freezing point challenges traditional theories by considering additional factors such as molecular structure, surface tension, and impurities. It takes a more comprehensive approach to understanding freezing, rather than just relying on the temperature of the substance.

3. What impact could a new point of view on freezing point have on industries?

A new point of view on freezing point has the potential to improve processes and products in industries such as food preservation, pharmaceuticals, and materials science. It could also lead to more efficient and cost-effective methods for freezing and thawing substances.

4. Are there any limitations to a new point of view on freezing point?

As with any scientific theory, there may be limitations to a new point of view on freezing point. It may not apply to all substances or situations, and further research and experimentation will be needed to fully understand its scope and potential.

5. How can a new point of view on freezing point be applied in practical situations?

A new point of view on freezing point can be applied in practical situations by providing a more accurate and detailed understanding of how substances freeze and thaw. This can inform the development of new technologies and techniques for freezing and thawing processes, as well as improve the quality and safety of frozen products.

Similar threads

  • Other Physics Topics
Replies
4
Views
1K
Replies
9
Views
2K
  • Thermodynamics
Replies
1
Views
636
Replies
11
Views
1K
Replies
5
Views
4K
  • Classical Physics
Replies
1
Views
2K
Replies
21
Views
15K
Replies
2
Views
1K
  • Mechanical Engineering
Replies
28
Views
2K
Back
Top